Robust Fault Detection with One-Class Training

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2025
Ark Ifeanyi Jamie Coble

Abstract

Anomaly detection is a critical capability in modern industrial systems, particularly in the energy sector where early fault identification can prevent catastrophic failures, minimize downtime, and reduce maintenance costs. However, the scarcity of labeled fault data in real-world applications makes traditional supervised learning approaches infeasible. This motivates the need for methods trained using only healthy data, a paradigm known as one-class training. One-class approaches are especially relevant for deployment in safety-critical domains such as nuclear power generation, grid monitoring, and process control, where failure data is rare, diverse, and expensive to collect. This study evaluates the performance and generalization capabilities of four data-driven methods trained exclusively on healthy data. The first method uses Principal Component Analysis to reduce data dimensionality and leverages reconstruction error for anomaly scoring. The second approach applies sequence modeling via a Long Short-Term Memory forecasting model, predicting future time steps based on past behavior and flagging sequences that deviate significantly from predicted values. The third is a one-dimensional convolutional autoencoder designed to reconstruct multivariate time-series inputs, with deviations in reconstruction used to identify potential anomalies. The fourth method, termed Deep Center Encoding, employs a neural network encoder trained to map healthy data to a compact region in latent space centered around a learned centroid, with outliers identified based on distance from this center. All methods are evaluated on sensor data from a real, operating nuclear power plant and tested for their ability to detect previously unseen fault distributions. Our results highlight trade-offs in sensitivity and generalization across the approaches, with Deep Center Encoding showing promising robustness to distribution shifts. These findings reinforce the feasibility and importance of one-class training frameworks for generalizable, fault-agnostic condition monitoring in industrial environments, supporting broader efforts in reliable artificial intelligence and predictive maintenance.

How to Cite

Ifeanyi, A., & Coble, J. (2025). Robust Fault Detection with One-Class Training. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2025.v17i1.4401
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Deep Center Encoding, Anomaly Detection, LSTM, Autoencoder, PCA, Condition Based Maintenance

References
Agarwal, V., Manjunatha, K. A., Gribok, A. V., Mortenson, T. J., Bao, H., Reese, R. D., . . . others (2021). Scalable technologies achieving risk-informed condition-based predictive maintenance enhancing the economic performance of operating nuclear power plants (Tech. Rep.). Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States).
Agarwal, V., Smith, J. A., Gribok, A. V., Joe, J. C., Oxstrand, J. H., & Primer, C. A. (2022). Data architecture and analytics requirements for artificial intelligence and machine learning applications to achieve condition-based maintenance (Tech. Rep.). Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States).
Chen, Y.-C. (2017). A tutorial on kernel density estimation and recent advances. Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 1(1), 161–187.
Ghorbani, A., & Zou, J. (2019). Data shapley: Equitable valuation of data for machine learning. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 2242–2251).
Han, T., Wang, X., Guo, J., Chang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025). Health-aware joint learning of scale distribution and compact representation for unsupervised anomaly detection in photovoltaic systems. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.
Ifeanyi, A., Saxena, A., & Coble, J. (2023). Within-bank condition monitoring and fault detection of fine motion control rod drives. 13th nuclear plant instrumentation. Control & Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2023), 66(8), 1053–1062.
Ifeanyi, A., Zanotelli, M., & Coble, J. (2025). System-level prognostics with explainable artificial intelligence. Control & Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2025).
Ifeanyi, A. O., Dos Santos, D., Saxena, A., & Coble, J. (2024). Fault detection and isolation in simulated batch operation of fine motion control rod drives. Nuclear Technology, 210(12), 2387–2403.
Kim, S., Choi, Y., & Lee, M. (2015). Deep learning with support vector data description. Neurocomputing, 165, 111–117.
Mackiewicz, A., & Ratajczak, W. (1993). Principal components analysis (pca). Computers & Geosciences, 19(3), 303–342.
Venkatesan, R., & Sriyutha Murthy, P. (2008). Macrofouling control in power plants. Springer.
Xu, H., Wang, Y., Jian, S., Liao, Q., Wang, Y., & Pang, G. (2024). Calibrated one-class classification for unsupervised time series anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
Section
Poster Presentations

Most read articles by the same author(s)