System-level Prognostics and Health Management for Complex Industrial Systems An Application to Pressurized Water Reactors

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 11, 2024
Mattia Zanotelli Jamie Coble

Abstract

Prognostics and health management (PHM) has become essential to guarantee aware and safe system operation and to inform economic decision-making. However, due to the nature of detection, diagnostics, and prognostic methods, applications have mainly been limited to the component level. In practice, most industrial systems consist of multiple interacting components whose partial degradation could lead to the system's failure (or subsystems).
This research addresses the limitations of traditional component-level PHM techniques by proposing a novel system-level framework. By implementing a hierarchical structure of components and subsystems, we will select an optimal method for each subsystem to aggregate its component health assessments. The overall system health can then be estimated by further combining the obtained estimates. The research considers simplified and holistic modeling techniques, margin-based methods, and hybrid graphical models. This approach aims to provide reliable system health predictions and online components' sensitivity measures to enhance maintenance decision-making. We consider an application in the context of the nuclear industry, characterized by strict safety and economic requirements. Using a SIMULINK model to approximate a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with real industrial inputs, we plan to add component degradation modules and use simulated sensor data and reliability information to test the proposed framework. Initial results on artificial case studies show the feasibility of integrating component-level health predictions.

How to Cite

Zanotelli, M., & Coble, J. (2024). System-level Prognostics and Health Management for Complex Industrial Systems: An Application to Pressurized Water Reactors. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2024.v16i1.4175
Abstract 35 | PDF Downloads 20

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

System level health management, Nuclear Power Plants, Hierarchical structure, Margins

References
Busquim e Silva, R., Piqueira, J., Cruz, J., & Marques, R. (2021, sep). Cybersecurity assessment framework for digital interface between safety and security at nuclear power plants. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., 34(C). doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100453

Diego Mandelli. (2020). Logos. Retrieved from https://github.com/idaholab/LOGOS.git

Ferri, F., Rodrigues, L., Gomes, J. P., de Medeiros, I., Galvao, R., & Nascimento Jr, C. (2013, 04). Combining phm information and system architecture to support aircraft maintenance planning. In (p. 60-65).

Hu, Y., Miao, X., Si, Y., Pan, E., & Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 217(C).

Kim, S., Choi, J.-H., & Kim, N. H. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of system-level prognostics. Sensors, 21(22).

Mandelli, D., Wang, C., Manjunatha, K., Agarwal, V., & Lin, L. (2023, 10). Rethinking reliability in terms of margins. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 15.

Tamssaouet, F., Nguyen, K. T., Medjaher, K., & Orchard, M. E. (2023). System-level failure prognostics: Literature review and main challenges. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 237(3), 524-545.

Zhao, X., Kim, J., Warns, K., Wang, X., Ramuhalli, P., Cetiner, S., . . . Golay, M. (2021). Prognostics and health management in nuclear power plants: An updated method-centric review with special focus on data-driven methods. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9.
Section
Doctoral Symposium Summaries