SPIKE-Dx A Low-Power High-Throughput Fault Diagnostics Tool using Spiking Neural Networks for Constrained Systems
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Diagnostic systems are important for many aerospace systems, which are severly limited in available power, like cubesats or UAVs. Therefore, traditional diagnostics systems cannot be used due to their substantial footprint and constraints. In this paper, we present our very low power diagnostic tool SPIKE-Dx. to monitor critical systems with constrained computational and energy resources. This is made possible through spiking neural networks (SNNs), which are executable within optimized simulation environments and further implemented on on cutting-edge neuromorphic hardware.
Based upon FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) framework, Diagnostic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) can be constructed that provide powerful means for diagnostic reasoning. In this paper, we describe such DBNs and a method to automatically translate the DBN into highly structured networks of spiking neurons for execution in SPIKE-Dx.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Spiking Neural Networks, Diagnosis, FMEA, Diagnostic Bayesian Networks
Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., & Ciancamerla, E. (2001). Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mappping fault trees into bayesian networks. In Reliability engineering and systems safety (Vol. 71, p. 249-260).
Christensen, D. V., Dittmann, R., Linares-Barranco, B., Sebastian, A., Gallo, M. L., Redaelli, A., . . . Pryds, N. (2022, may). 2022 roadmap on neuromorphic computing and engineering. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 2(2), 022501. Ret .doi.org/10.1088/2634-4386/ac4a83 doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ac4a83
Corbetta, M., & Kulkarni, C. S. (2019, September). An approach towards uncertainty quantification and management of unmanned aerial vehicle health. In S. Clements (Ed.), Annual conference of the prognostic and health management society. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf .2019.v11i1.847
Davies, M., Srinivasa, N., Lin, T.-H., Chinya, G., Cao, Y., Choday, S. H., . . . Wang, H. (2018). Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro, 38(1), 82-99. doi: 10.1109/MM.2018 .112130359
Fang, H., Shi, H., Dong, Y., Fan, H., & Ren, S. (2017). Spacecraft power system fault diagnosis based on dnn. In 2017 prognostics and system health management conference (phm-harbin) (p. 1-5). doi: 10.1109/PHM .2017.8079271
Gerstner, W., Kistler, W. M., Naud, R., & Paninski, L. (2014). Neuronal dynamics: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition. Cambridge University Press. Gilabert, A. G. E. (2011). Mapping fmea into bayesian networks. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 7(6), 525--537.
Hogge, E., Bole, B., Vazquez, S., Kulkarni, C., Strom, T., Hill, B., . . . 8, C. Q. (2018). Verification of prognostic algorithms to predict remaining flying time for electric unmanned vehicles. In International journal of prognostics and health management, issn 2153-2648, 2018 021.
Huang, Z., Wang, T., Liu, W., Valencia-Cabrera, L., Perez- Jimenez, M. J., & Li, P. (2021). A fault analysis method for three-phase induction motors based on spiking neural p systems. Complexity. doi: 10.1155/2021/2087027
Kungl, A. F., Schmitt, S., KlÅNahn, J., MÅNuller, P., Baumbach, A., Dold, D., . . . Petrovici, M. A. (2019). Accelerated physical emulation of bayesian inference in spiking neural networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience. doi: 10 .3389/fnins.2019.01201
Ma, D., Zhou, Z., Jiang, Y., & Ding, W. (2014). Constructing bayesian network by integrating fmea with fta. doi: 10.1109/imccc.2014.148
Moreno-Bote, R.,&Drugowitsch, J. (2015, december). Causal inference and explaining away in a spiking network. Sci Repo, 5(17531).
Paulin, M. G., & van Schaik, A. (2014). Bayesian inference with spiking neurons.
Pearl, J. (1985). Bayesian networks: A model cf self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. In 7th conference of the cognitive science society. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: models, reasoning and inference. MIT Press Cambridge, MA.
Pecevski, D., Buesing, L., & Maass, W. (2011). Probabilistic inference in general graphical models through sampling in stochastic networks of spiking neurons. Plos Computational Biology. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002294
Rao, R. P. (2004). Hierarchical bayesian inference in networks of spiking neurons. In L. Saul, Y. Weiss, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 17). MIT Press. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips .cc/paper files/paper/2004/file/ 38181d991caac98be8fb2ecb8bd0f166 -Paper.pdf
Stewart, T. C. (2012). A technical overview of the neural engineering framework (Tech. Rep.). Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience.
Stuijt, J., Sifalakis, M., Yousefzadeh, A., & Corradi, F. (2021). μbrain: An event-driven and fully synthesizable architecture for spiking neural networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/ journals/neuroscience/articles/ 10.3389/fnins.2021.664208 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.664208
Tarcsay, B. L. (2024). Risk-based fault detection using bayesian networks based on failure mode and effect analysis. Sensors. doi: 10.3390/s24113511
Titirsha, T., Song, S., Das, A., Krichmar, J. L., Dutt, N., Kandasamy, N., & Catthoor, F. (2022). Enduranceaware mapping of spiking neural networks to neuromorphic hardware. Ieee Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. doi: 10.1109/tpds.2021.3065591
Wade, J., McDaid, L., Harkin, J., Crunelli, V., & Scott Kelso, J. A. (2012). Self-repair in a bidirectionally coupled astrocyte-neuron (an) system based on retrograde signaling. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00076
Wang, T., Wei, X., Wang, J., Huang, T., Peng, H., Song, X., . . . Perez–Jimenez, M. J. (2020). A weighted corrective fuzzy reasoning spiking neural p system for fault diagnosis in power systems with variable topologies. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103680
Xiao, C., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2022). Optimal mapping of spiking neural network to neuromorphic hardware for edge-ai. Sensors. doi: 10.3390/s22197248
Xu, B., Li, H., Pang, W., Chen, D., Tian, Y., Lei, X., . . . Patelli, E. (2019). Bayesian network approach to fault diagnosis of a hydroelectric generation system. Energy Science & Engineering. doi: 10.1002/ese3.383
Yang, F., & Yu, W. (2013). Multi-fault diagnosis for industrial processes based on hybrid dynamic bayesian network. doi: 10.2316/p.2013.794-053
Yerima, W. Y. (2023). Fault-tolerant spiking neural network mapping algorithm and architecture to 3d-noc-based neuromorphic systems. Ieee Access. doi: 10.1109/ access.2023.3278802
Yu, Z., Huang, T., & Liu, J. K. (2018). Implementation of bayesian inference in distributed neural networks. In 2018 26th euromicro international conference on parallel, distributed and network-based processing (pdp) (p. 666-673). doi: 10.1109/PDP2018.2018.00111
Zermani, S., Dezan, C., Chenini, H., Diguet, J.-P., & Euler, R. (2015). Fpga implementation of bayesian network inference for an embedded diagnosis. In 2015 ieee conference on prognostics and health management (phm) (p. 1-10). doi: 10.1109/ICPHM.2015.7245057
Zhang, M., Gu, Z., Zheng, N., De, M., & Pan, G. (2020). Efficient spiking neural networks with logarithmic temporal coding. Ieee Access. doi: 10.1109/access.2020 .2994360
Zhao, J., Donati, E., & Indiveri, G. (2020). Neuromorphic implementation of spiking relational neural network for motor control. doi: 10.1109/aicas48895.2020.9073829
Zuo, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, Z.-H., Luo, X.-L., & Liu, Y. (2021). A spiking neural network-based approach to bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 714-724. Retrieved from https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0278612520301138 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.003
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.