Modeling and Prediction of Criminal Activity Based on Spatio-Temporal Probabilistic Risk Functions

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Paulina Flores Mario Vergara Pablo Fuentes Francisco Jaramillo David Acun ̃a Aramis Perez Marcos Orchard

Abstract

Security forces need to model risk patterns associated with criminal activity to study cause-effect relationships and predict new crimes. In this regard, criminal risk models are important to obtain relevant information for better resource al- location and prevention of future crime activity. This paper proposes a method to model and predict future criminal activity based on spatial probabilistic risk functions and a characterization of their temporal evolution as new data become available. This method uses geo-referenced information of public services (e.g., shopping centers, banks) and criminal incidents to approximate the prior risk function as a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). Temporal evolution of crime activity is characterized using an algorithm that is based on Sequential Monte Carlo Methods and Importance Sampling. This algorithm incorporates information from new measurements, in a recursive manner, to approximate the posterior spatial probabilistic risk function by updating particle positions in the map. Finally, we propose a novel prediction scheme for criminal activity that uses Gaussian fields centered on hypothetical future criminal events, which are sampled from a GMM that characterizes the spatial distribution associated with recent crime activity. The optimum number of centroids for each Gaussian kernel is evaluated using Silhouette algorithm. The time index related to each hypothetical future crime event is probabilistically characterized using an exponential distribution. Results using real data show that the majority of future events occur within risk modeled zones, information which can be used for resource allocation and improvement of intervention plans.

How to Cite

Flores, . P. ., Vergara, M. ., Fuentes, P., Jaramillo, F. ., Acun ̃a D. ., Perez, A. ., & Orchard, M. . (2015). Modeling and Prediction of Criminal Activity Based on Spatio-Temporal Probabilistic Risk Functions. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2015.v7i1.2676
Abstract 11 | PDF Downloads 3

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Sequential Monte Carlo, criminal risk characterization

References
Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 50(2), 174–188.

Bergman, N. (1999). Recursive Bayesian estimation. Department of Electrical Engineering, Linko ̈ping University, Linko ̈ping Studies in Science and Technology. Doctoral dissertation, 579.

Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Criminal careers and ”career criminals,”. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2, 361-364.

Brown, D., Dalton, J., & Hoyle, H. (2004). Spatial Forecast Methods for Terrorist Events in Urban Environments. In H. Chen, R. Moore, D. Zeng, & J. Leavitt (Eds.), Intelligence and security informatics se - 33 (Vol. 3073, pp. 426–435). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Candy, J. V. (2007). Bootstrap particle filtering. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 24(4), 73–85.

Doucet, A., Godsill, S., & Andrieu, C. (2000). On sequential monte carlo sampling methods for bayesian filtering. Statistics and Computing,Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 10, 197-208.

Doucet, S. a. (2001). Sequential monte carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Eck, J., Chainey, S., Cameron, J., & Wilson, R. (2005). Map- ping crime: Understanding hotspots.

Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern recognition letters, 27(8), 861–874.

Furtado, V., Melo, A., Coelho, A., Menezes, R., & Belchior, M. (2008). Simulating crime against properties using swarm intelligence and social networks. Artificial Crime Analysis
Systems: Using Computer Simulations and Geographic Information Systems, 1, 300-317.

Ivaha, C., Al-Madfai, H., Higgs, G., & Ware, J. (2007). The Dynamic Spatial Disaggregation Approach: A Spatio- Temporal Modelling of Crime. In World congress on engineering (pp. 961–966).

Liu, H., & Brown, D. (2003, October). Criminal incident prediction using a point-pattern-based density model.
International Journal of Forecasting, 19(4), 603–622. Reynolds, D. (1995). Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 3(1),72-83.

Rodrigues, A., Diggle, P., & Assuncao, R. (2010). Semiparametric approach to point source modelling in epidemiology and criminology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 59(3), 533–542.

Smith, M. A., & Brown, D. E. (2007). Discrete choice analysis of spatial attack sites. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 5(3), 255–274.

Wang, X., & Brown, D. (2012a). The spatio-temporal mod- eling for criminal incidents. Security Informatics, 1(1), 1–17.

Wang, X., & Brown, D. E. (2012b). The spatio-temporal modeling for criminal incidents. Security Informatics, 1(1), 1–17.

Xue, Y., & Brown, D. (2006, March). Spatial analysis with preference specification of latent decision makers for criminal event prediction. Decision Support Systems, 41(3), 560–573.

Yu, G., Sapiro, G., & Mallat, S. (2011). Solving inverse problems with piecewise linear estimators: From gaussian mixture models to structured sparsity,. IEEE Trans. Im- age Process.
Section
Technical Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>