Parameters Adaption of Lebesgue Sampling-based Diagnosis and Prognosis for Li-ion Batteries

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Wuzhao Yan Wanchun Dou Datong Liu Yu Peng Bin Zhang

Abstract

Traditional fault diagnosis and prognosis (FDP) approaches are based on Riemann sampling (RS), in which samples are taken and algorithms are executed in a periodic time interval. With the increase of system complexity, the real-time implementation of this Riemann sampling-based FDP (RS- FDP) becomes a bottleneck, especially for distributed applications. To overcome this problem, a Lebesgue sampling- based FDP (LS-FDP) is proposed. LS-FDP takes samples on the fault dimension axis and provides a need-based diagnostic philosophy in which the algorithm is executed only when necessary. In previous Lebesgue sampling-based FDP, the Lebesgue length is a constant. To accommodate the change of fault dynamics, it is desirable to execute FDP algorithm more frequently when the fault growth is fast while less frequently when fault growth is slow. This requires to change the Lebesgue length adaptively. The goal of this paper is to deliver an improved LS-FDP method with varying Lebesgue length, which enables the FDP to be executed according to needs. The design and implementation of varying Lebesgue length LS-FDP based on a particle filtering algorithm are illustrated with experimental results on Li-ion batteries to verify the performances of the proposed approach. The experimental results show that the new varying LS-FDP is accurate and time-efficient on long term prognosis and also keeps a closer monitoring on the fast increase of fault size.

How to Cite

Yan, W. ., Dou, W. ., Liu, D. ., Peng, Y. ., & Zhang, B. . (2015). Parameters Adaption of Lebesgue Sampling-based Diagnosis and Prognosis for Li-ion Batteries. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2015.v7i1.2764
Abstract 4 | PDF Downloads 3

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

PHM

References
Astrom, K., & Bernhardsson, B. (2002, Dec). Comparison of riemann and lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems. In Decision and control, 2002, proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on (Vol. 2, p. 2011-2016 vol.2). doi: 10.1109/CDC.2002.1184824

Goebel, K., Saha, B., & Saxena, A. (2008). A comparison of three data-driven techniques for prognostics. In 62nd meeting of the society for machinery failure prevention technology (mfpt) (pp. 119–131).

Goebel, K. F., Yan, W., Eklund, N. H. W., Hu, X.,Avasarala, V., & Celaya, J. (2006). Defect classification of highly noisy nde data using classifier ensembles (Vol. 6167). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.659704 DOI: 10.1117/12.659704

He, W., Williard, N., Osterman, M., & Pecht, M. (2011). Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on dempster–shafer theory and the bayesian monte carlo method. Journal of Power Sources, 196(23), 10314– 10321.

McCann, R., & Le, A. (2008, Oct). Lebesgue sampling with a kalman filter in wireless sensors for smart appliance networks. In Industry applications society annual meeting, 2008. ias ’08. IEEE (p. 1-5). DOI: 10.1109/08IAS.2008.9

Pattipati, K., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Howell, M., & Salman, M. (2011). Fault diagnosis and prognosis in a network of embedded systems in automotive vehicles. In Nsf-nist- uscar workshop on cyber-physical systems.

Saha, B., Goebel, K., Poll, S., & Christophersen, J. (2009, Feb). Prognostics methods for battery health monitoring using a bayesian framework. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, 58(2), 291-296. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2008.2005965

Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 1(1), 20.

Schwabacher, M., & Goebel, K. (2007). A survey of artificial intelligence for prognostics. In AAAI fall symposium: Artificial intelligence for prognostics. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Library/Symposia /Fall/2007/fs07-02-016.php

Sidhu, A., Izadian, A., & Anwar, S. (2015, Feb). Adaptive nonlinear model-based fault diagnosis of li-ion batteries. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 62(2), 1002-1011. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2336599

Vachtsevanos, G., Lewis, F., L., Roemer, M., Hess, A., & Wu, B. (2006). Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. John Wiley and Sons.

Zhang, B., Sconyers, C., Byington, C., Patrick, R., Orchard, M., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2011, May). A probabilistic fault detection approach: Application to bearing fault detection. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 58(5), 2011-2018. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2010.2058072

Zhang, B., Tang, L., DeCastro, J., Roemer, M., & Goebel, K. (2014). Autonomous vehicle battery state-of-charge prognostics enhanced mission planning. Int. J. Prognost. Health Manage, 5(2), 1–12.

Zhang, B., & Wang, X. (2014). Fault diagnosis and prognosis based on lebesgue sampling. In Annual conference of the prognostics and health management society 2014 (Vol. 5).
Section
Technical Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>