Distributed fault diagnosis solutions are becoming necessary due to the complexity of modern engineering systems, and the advent of smart sensors and computing elements. This paper presents a novel event-based approach for distributed diagnosis of abrupt parametric faults in continuous systems, based on a qualitative abstraction of measurement deviations from the nominal behavior. We systematically derive dynamic fault signatures expressed as event-based fault models. We develop a distributed diagnoser design algorithm that uses these models for designing local event-based diagnosers based on global diagnosability analysis. The local diag-nosers each generate globally correct diagnosis results locally, without a centralized coordinator, by communicating a minimal number of measurements between themselves. The proposed approach is applied to a multi-tank system, and results demonstrate a marked improvement in scalability compared to a centralized approach.
How to Cite
discrete-event systems, distributed diagnosis, qualitative fault diagnosis, continuous systems
(Daigle et al., 2007a) M. Daigle, X. Koutsoukos, and G. Biswas. A qualitative approach to multiple fault isolation in continuous systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 293–298, July 2007.
(Daigleetal.,2007b) M.J.Daigle, X.D.Koutsoukos, and G. Biswas. Distributed diagnosis in formations of mobile robots. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, 23(2):353–369, April 2007.
(Daigleetal.,2009) M.J.Daigle, X.Koutsoukos, and G. Biswas. A qualitative event-based approach to continuous systems diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 17(4):780– 793, July 2009.
(Daigle et al., 2010) M. Daigle, I. Roychoudhury, G. Biswas, X. Koutsoukos, A. Patterson-Hine, , and S. Poll. A comprehensive diagnosis methodology for complex hybrid systems: A case study on spacecraft power distribution systems. IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 4(5):917–931, September 2010.
(Daigle, 2008) M. Daigle. A Qualitative Event-based Approach to Fault Diagnosis of Hybrid Systems. PhD thesis, Vanderbilt University, 2008.
(Debouk et al., 2000) Rami Debouk, S. Lafortune, and Demosthenis Teneketzis. Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 10(1-2):33–86, 2000.
(Meseguer et al., 2008) J. Meseguer, V. Puig, and T. Escobet. Fault diagnosis using a timed discrete event approach based on interval observers. In Proc. of the 17th IFAC World Congress, 2008.
(Mosterman and Biswas, 1999) P. J. Mosterman and G. Biswas. Diagnosis of continuous valued systems in transient operating regions. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, 29(6):554–565, 1999.
(Narasimhan et al., 1998) S. Narasimhan, P. J. Mosterman, and G. Biswas. A systematic analysis of measurement selection algorithms for fault isolation in dynamic systems. In Proc. of DX 1998, pages 94–101, Cape Cod, MA USA, May 1998.
(Puig et al., 2005) V. Puig, F. Schmid, J. Quevedo, and B. Pulido. A new fault diagnosis algorithm that improves the integration of fault detection and isolation. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 3809–3814, December 2005.
(Ribotetal.,2008) P.Ribot,Y.Pencole ́,andM.Com- bacau. Design requirements for the diagnosability of distributed discrete event systems. In Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, pages 347–354, September 2008.
(Roychoudhury et al., 2009) I. Roychoudhury, G. Biswas, and X. Koutsoukos. Designing distributed diagnosers for complex continuous systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 6(2):277–290, April 2009.
(Sampath et al., 1996) M. Sampath, R. Sengupta, S. Lafortune, K. Sinnamohideen, and D.C. Teneket- zis. Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 4(2):105–124, Mar. 1996.
(Zad et al., 2003) S. Hashtrudi Zad, R.H. Kwong, and W.M. Wonham. Fault diagnosis in discrete-event systems: framework and model reduction. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 48(7):1199–1212, July 2003.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.