Combination of Simulation and State Observers for Consistency-based Diagnosis

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 26, 2021
Anibal Bregon Belarmino Pulido Carlos Alonso-Gonza ́lez

Abstract

Consistency-based diagnosis of dynamic systems using possible conflicts rely upon a semi-closed loop simulation of numerical models. Simulation approaches need to know the initial state, which is a nontrivial requirement in real-world systems. Prognosis approaches also require techniques for predicting the future system states under nominal and faulty conditions. This work proposes to integrate state observers to estimate initial states for simulation within the consistency-based diagnosis framework using possible conflicts. This work extends the BRIDGE framework for one class of dynamic systems, using the possible conflict concept to find every subsystem with necessary structural redundancy to lead to a minimal conflict activation. These algorithms can analyze those structures, without additional information, and point out possible implementations as observers or simulators. This proposal has been tested on a simulation scenario. Results and comparison with similar exist- ing hybrid -DX + FDI- approaches are provided.

How to Cite

Bregon, A., Pulido, B., & Alonso-Gonza ́lez C. (2021). Combination of Simulation and State Observers for Consistency-based Diagnosis. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 1(1). Retrieved from https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/phmconf/article/view/1470
Abstract 3 | PDF Downloads 3

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

diagnosis

References
(Armengol et al., 2009) J. Armengol, T. Escobet, E. Gelso, M. Krysander, M. Nyberg, X. Olive, B. Pulido, and L. Trave ́-Massuye`s. Minimal structurally overdetermined sets for residual generation: A comparison of alternative approaches. In Procs. of IFAC-Safeprocess’09, Barcelone, Spain, 2009.
(Blanke et al., 2006) M. Blanke, M. Kinnaert, J. Lunze, and M. Staroswiecki. Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control. Springer, 2nd edition, 2006.
(Chantler et al., 1996) M.J. Chantler, T. Daus, S. Vikatos, and G.M. Coghill. The use of quantitative dynamic models and dependency recording engines. In Procs. of DX’96, pages 59–68, Val Morin, Canada, 1996.
(Christophe et al., 2004) C. Christophe, V. Cocquem- pot, and B. Jiang. Link between high-gain observer-based and parity space residuals for fdi. Trans. on the Institute of Measurement and Control, 26(325), 2004.
(Cordier et al., 2004) M.O. Cordier, P. Dague, F. Le ́vy, J. Montmain, M. Staroswiecki, and L. Trave ́-Massuye`s. Conflicts versus analytical redundancy relations: a comparative analysis of the model-based diagnosis approach from the artificial intelligence and automatic control perspectives. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cy. B., 34(5):2163–2177, 2004.
(de Kleer and Williams, 1987) J. de Kleer and B.C. Williams. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence, 32:97–130, 1987.
(de Kleer, 2003) J. de Kleer. Fundamentals of model-based diagnosis. Procs. of DX’03, june 2003.
(Dressler, 1996) O. Dressler. On-line diagnosis and monitoring of dynamic systems based on qualitative models and dependency-recording diagnosis engines. In Procs. of ECAI’96, pages 461–465, 1996.
(Dustego ̈r et al., 2006) D. Dustego ̈r, E. Frisk, V. Coquempot, M. Krysander, and M. Staroswiecki. Structural analysis of fault isolability in the DAMADICS benchmark. Control Engineering Practice, 14(6):597–608, 2006.
(Gertler, 1998) J.J. Gertler. Fault detection and diagnosis in Engineering Systems. Marcel Dekker, Inc., Basel, 1998.
(Hamscher et al., 1992) W. Hamscher, L. Console, and J. de Kleer(Eds.). Readings in Model based Diagnosis. Morgan-Kaufmann Pub., San Mateo, 1992.
(Isermann, 2006) R. Isermann. Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
(Katsillis and Chantler, 1997) G. Katsillis and M.J. Chantler. Can dependency-based diagnosis cope with simultaneous equations? InProcs.ofDX’97, pages 51–59, Le Mont Saint Michel, France, 1997.
(Keogh and Ratanamahatana, 2005) E. Keogh and C. A. Ratanamahatana. Exact indexing of dy- namic time warping. Knowledge and Information Systems, 7(3):358–386, 2005.
(Krysanderetal.,2008) M.Krysander,J.A ̊slund,and M. Nyberg. An efficient algorithm for finding min- imal over-constrained sub-systems for model-based diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cy. A., 38(1), 2008.
(Mosterman and Biswas, 1999) P. Mosterman and G. Biswas. Diagnosis of continuous valued systems in transient operating regions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cy., 29(6):554–565, 1999.
(Pulido and Alonso-Gonza ́lez, 2004) B. Pulido and C. Alonso-Gonza ́lez. Possible conflicts: a compilation technique for consistency-based diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cy. B., Special Issue on Diagnosis of Complex Systems, 34(5):2192–2206, 2004.
(Pulido et al., 2007) B. Pulido, C. Alonso, A. Brego ́n, V. Puig, and T. Escobet. Analyzing the influence of temporal constraints in possible conflicts calculation for model-based diagnosis. In Procs. of DX’07, Nashville, TN, USA, 2007.
Section
Technical Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>