Postprocessing of Autoencoder Reconstruction Error for Detection and Diagnostics of Faults in Infrequently-driven Ground Vehicles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2025
Matthew Moon Ethan Kohrt Michael Thurston Nenad Nenadic

Abstract

We investigated the detection and classification of engine and transmission faults in infrequently-driven ground vehicles using data-driven methods based on neural network autoencoders. The data came from seventeen vehicles, each with an engine-related or a transmission-related maintenance event. The vehicles had months to years of sensor controller area network (CAN) bus data sampled at 1Hz. Separate autoencoder models were trained for each vehicle to improve detection sensitivity. The paper investigates several condition indicators (CIs) derived from autoencoder reconstruction error, each computed from a sequence of the reconstruction’s mean absolute error (MAE). These CIs were compared using a performance metric computed as the area under the Pareto front with respect to normalized detection horizon and normalized baseline-relative CI margin. A novel detection procedure, consistent detection, effectively filtered out short-duration isolated spikes, likely false positives, while also increasing sensitivity to more plausible anomalies. In addition, the initial development of data-driven diagnostics, based on a novel approach of classifying full reconstruction error vectors associated with the fault state, showed promise but failed our robustness checks.

How to Cite

Moon, M., Kohrt, E., Thurston, M., & Nenadic, N. (2025). Postprocessing of Autoencoder Reconstruction Error for Detection and Diagnostics of Faults in Infrequently-driven Ground Vehicles. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2025.v17i1.4359
Abstract 1 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

anomaly detection, autoencoder, data-driven diagnostics, ground vehicles, engine faults, transmission faults, CAN bus data

References
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., . . . others (2016). Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th {USENIX} symposium on operating systems design and implementation ({OSDI} 16) pp. 265–283.

Al-Tubi, I., Long, H., Zhang, J., & Shaw, B. (2015). Experimental and analytical study of gear micropitting initiation and propagation under varying loading conditions. Wear, 328, pp.8–16.

Anderson, D. P., & Driver, R. D. (1979). Equilibrium particle concentration in engine oil. Wear, 56(2), pp.415–419.

Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A. D., & Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors, 20(10), 2778.

Bechhoefer, E., & Kingsley, M. (2009). A review of time synchronous average algorithms. In Annual conference of the phm society (Vol. 1).

Cheng, J., Xiong, W., Chen, W., Gu, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Pixel-level crack detection using u-net. In Tencon 2018-2018 IEEE region 10 conference pp. 0462–0466.

Chollet, F. (2021). Deep learning with python. Simon and Schuster.

Dong, C., Li, L., Yan, J., Zhang, Z., Pan, H., & Catbas, F. N. (2021). Pixel-level fatigue crack segmentation in large-scale images of steel structures using an encoder–decoder network. Sensors, 21(12), 4135.

Du, G., Cao, X., Liang, J., Chen, X., & Zhan, Y. (2020). Medical image segmentation based on u-net: A review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 64, 1–12.

Geron, A. (2019). Hands-on machine learning with scikit-learn, keras tensorflow (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media, Inc..

Gonzalez, R., & Wood, R. (2017). Digital image processing (4th ed.). Pearson.

Hood, A., Valant, C., Martuscello, J., Horney, P., Jones, A., Lantner, J., & Nenadic, N. (2021, Nov). Autoencoder-based anomaly detector for gear tooth bending fatigue cracks. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 13(1). doi: 10.36001/phmconf.2021.v13i1.3003

Hsieh, Y.-A., & Tsai, Y. J. (2020). Machine learning for crack detection: Review and model performance comparison. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(5), 04020038.

Kaehler, A., & Bradski, G. (2016). Learning opencv 3: computer vision in c++ with the opencv library. O’Reilly Media, Inc..

Key, J. W., & Kacher, J. (2021, Aug). Establishing first order correlations between pitting corrosion initiation and local microstructure in AA5083 using automated image analysis. Materials Characterization, 178, 111237.doi: 10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2021.111237

Krantz, T. L. (2014). On the correlation of specific film thickness and gear pitting life. AGMA Technical Paper, 14FTM21, 1-18.

Laghari, M. S., & Hassan, A. (2019). Wear particle texture analysis. In 2019 3rd international conference on imaging, signal processing and communication (icispc)(p. 67-72). doi: 10.1109/ICISPC.2019.8935804

Lebold, M., McClintic, K., Campbell, R., Byington, C., & Maynard, K. (2000). Review of vibration analysis methods for gearbox diagnostics and prognostics. In Proceedings of the 54th meeting of the society for machinery failure prevention technology (Vol. 634, p. 16).

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), pp.436–444.

Li, S., & Kahraman, A. (2021). A scuffing model for spur gear contacts. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 156, 104161.

Liu, Z., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2019). Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using u-net fully convolutional networks. Automation in Construction, 104, 129–139.

Mark, W. D., Lee, H., Patrick, R., & Coker, J. D. (2010). A simple frequency-domain algorithm for early detection of damaged gear teeth. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(8), pp.2807–2823.

Miltenovi´c, A., Rakonjac, I., Oarcea, A., Peri´c, M., & Rangelov, D. (2022). Detection and monitoring of pitting progression on gear tooth flank using deep learning. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5327. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115327doi: 10.3390/app12115327

Morales-Espejel, G., Rycerz, P., & Kadiric, A. (2018). Prediction of micropitting damage in gear teeth contacts considering the concurrent effects of surface fatigue and mild wear. Wear, 398, pp.99–115.

Onsy, A., Bicker, R., Shaw, B., & Fouad, M. M. (2012).Application of image registration methods in monitoring the progression of surface fatigue failures in geared transmission systems. In 2012 IEEE aerospace conference, pp. 1–14.

Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016).You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 779–788.

Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-net:Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention pp.234–241.

Samuel, P. D., & Pines, D. J. (2005). A review of vibration-based techniques for helicopter transmission diagnostics. Journal of sound and vibration, 282(1-2), 475508.

Sharma, V., & Parey, A. (2016). A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators. Procedia Engineering, 144, pp.253–263.

Shigley, J. E., & Mischke, C. R. (1989). Mechanical engineering design. In (Fifth ed., pp. 593-595). McGraw Hill Book Company.

Siddique, N., Paheding, S., Elkin, C. P., & Devabhaktuni, V.
(2021). U-net and its variants for medical image segmentation: A review of theory and applications. IEEE Access, 9, pp.82031–82057.

Wagner, M. E., Mark, W. D., & Isaacson, A. C. (2021). Implementation of the average-log-ratio ALR gear-damage detection algorithm on gear-fatigue-test recordings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 154, 107590
Section
Technical Research Papers