Railcar Bogie Performance Monitoring using Mutual Information and Support Vector Machines

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Parham Shahidi Daniel Maraini Brad Hopkins Andrew Seidel

Abstract

Railcar condition monitoring is an area of high importance and global relevance. The economic and safety concerns of equipment maintenance in North America mandate efforts in prognostics and health management. This paper presents the results from the development of a vibration based condition monitoring algorithm for freight rail, utilizing mutual information feature selection and support vector machine classification of bogie component faults. The algorithm is an implementation of a previously proposed railcar condition monitoring solution by the authors. The proposed monitoring solution is a data-driven method which was developed with measurements taken at a railroad test laboratory under controlled conditions. Vibration data was collected from multiple locations on a railcar over several test runs, each utilizing wheelsets with different levels of wear. The input of controlled wheel wear levels was aimed at varying the system outputs to resemble those of cars with different levels of mileage in revenue service. The generated data sets were processed and a feature set was extracted from the acceleration signals. The data was divided into training and validation partitions using a cross validation scheme to preserve the sequence for both sets. A mutual information (MI) estimation algorithm was used to rank the features based on their similarity to the classified fault state. Both the optimized feature set from the MI feature selection algorithm as well as the full, non-discriminate feature set were used as inputs to the support vector machine to assess classification accuracy. The results of this assessment are presented in the paper along with a presentation of the methods. The paper concludes with a proposal for a monitoring strategy aimed at specifically detecting faulty components and practicing predictive maintenance.

How to Cite

Shahidi, P., Maraini, D., Hopkins, B., & Seidel, A. (2015). Railcar Bogie Performance Monitoring using Mutual Information and Support Vector Machines. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2015.v7i1.2711
Abstract 6 | PDF Downloads 2

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

preventive maintenance, diagnostics, Asset health management, bogie performance, Support Vector Machine, pattern recognition, Mutual Information, Railcar

References
AAR. (2007). Design, Fabrication, and Construction of Freight Cars Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices C-II (Vol. [M-1001]).
Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 50(2), 174-188.
Barke, D. a. C. K. W. (2005). Structural health monitoring in the railway industry: A review. Structural Health Monitoring, 4(1), 81 - 94.
Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4): springer New York.
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3), 273-297.
Haykin, S., & Network, N. (2004). A comprehensive foundation. Neural Networks, 2(2004).
Hopkins, B., Seidel, A., Maraini, D., & Shahidi, P. (2015). End-of-car Device Condition Monitoring with Onboard Sensors. Paper presented at the ASME Joint Rail Conference, San Jose, CA.
Hubbard, P., Ward, C., Goodall, R., & Dixon, R. (2013). Real time detection of low adhesion in the wheel/rail contact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 0954409713503634.
Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 82(1), 35-45.
Lagnebäck, R. (2007). Evaluation of wayside condition monitoring technologies for condition-based maintenance of railway vehicles: Luleå University of Technology Luleå.
Li, P., & Goodall, R. (2004). Model-based condition monitoring for railway vehicle systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the UKACC international conference on control, Bath, UK.
Maraini, D., Shahidi, P., Hopkins, B. M., & Seidel, A. (2014). Development of a Bogie-Mounted Vehicle On-Board Weighing System. Paper presented at the 2014 Joint Rail Conference.
Mei, T., & Li, H. (2008). Measurement of vehicle ground speed using bogie-based inertial sensors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 222(2), 107-116.
Shahidi, P., Maraini, D., Hopkins, B., & Seidel, A. (2014). Estimation of Bogie Performance Criteria Through On-Board Condition Monitoring. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2014, Fort Worth, TX.
Tournay, H., Wu, H., & Wilson, N. (2009). A Review of the Root Causes for Loaded Car Hunting, Technology Digest TD-09-014: AAR, TTCI, Pueblo, CO.
Ward, C. P., Goodall, R. M., Dixon, R., & Charles, G. (2010). Condition monitoring of rail vehicle bogies.
Ward, C. P., Weston, P., Stewart, E., Li, H., Goodall, R. M., Roberts, C., . . . Dixon, R. (2011). Condition monitoring opportunities using vehicle-based sensors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 225(2), 202-218.
Xia, F., & True, H. (2003, 22-24 April 2003). On the dynamics of the three-piece-freight truck. Paper presented at the Rail Conference, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME Joint.
Zakharov, S. M., & Zharov, I. A. (2005). Criteria of bogie performance and wheel/rail wear prediction based on wayside measurements. Wear, 258(7–8), 1135- 1141. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.025
Section
Technical Papers