A Tool Chain for the V&V of NASA Cryogenic Fuel Loading Health Management

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 29, 2014
Johann Schumann Vanesa Gomez-Gonzalez Nagabhushan Mahadevan Michael Lowry Peter Robinson Gabor Karsai

Abstract

Complex machinery like spacecraft, aircraft, or chemical plants are equipped with fault detection and diagnosis systems. Due to their safety-critical nature, such diagnosis systems have to undergo rigorous Verification and Validation (V&V). In this paper, we present a tool suite to facilitate V&V of the deployed diagnostic system. The V&V relies on the paradigms of cross validation (to compare the diagnosis results of the deployed reasoner against those of other, more advanced reasoners), automatic fault scenario generation (to support extensive testing and coverage analysis), and parametric model analysis (to enrich test sets and for robustness and sensitivity analysis). We present the application of this tool architecture towards the V&V of the diagnosis system based on the TEAMS tool suite towards a subsystem in the NASA cryogenic fuel loading facility.

How to Cite

Schumann, J. ., Gomez-Gonzalez, V. ., Mahadevan, N. ., Lowry, M. ., Robinson, P. ., & Karsai, G. . (2014). A Tool Chain for the V&V of NASA Cryogenic Fuel Loading Health Management. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2014.v6i1.2392
Abstract 298 | PDF Downloads 94

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

verification and validation, TEAMS, cryogenic fuel, cross-validation, parametric model analysis

References
Abdelwahed, S., Dubey, A., Karsai, G., & Mahadevan, N. (2011). Model-based tools and techniques for real-time system and software health management. Ma- chine Learning and Knowledge Discovery for Engineering Systems Health Management, 285.

Abdelwahed, S., Karsai, G., & Biswas, G. (2005). A consistency-based robust diagnosis approach for temporal causal systems. In 16th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (pp. 73–79).

Abdelwahed, S., Karsai, G., Mahadevan, N., & Ofsthun, S. C. (2009). Practical considerations in systems diagnosis using timed failure propagation graph models. Instru- mentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, 58(2), 240–247.

Giannakopoulou, D., Bushnell, D., Schumann, J., Erzberger, H., & Here, K. (2011). Formal testing for separation assurance. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 63(1), 5–30.

Goodrich, C., Narasimhan, S., Daigle, M., Hatfield, W., & Johnson, R. (2007). Applying model-based diagnosis to a rapid propellant loading system.

Gundy-Burlet, K., Schumann, J., Menzies, T., & Barrett, T. (2008). Parametric Analysis of ANTARES Re-entry Guidance Algorithms using advanced Test Generation and Data Analysis. In Proc. i-SAIRAS 2008.

Hayden, S., Oza, N., Mah, R., Mackey, R., Narasimhan, S., Karsai, G., Shirley, M. (2006). Diagnostic technology evaluation report for on-board crew launch vehicle (Tech. Rep.). NASA.

Lindsey, A. E., & Pecheur, C. (2004). Simulation-based verification of autonomous controllers via Livingstone Pathfinder. In K. Jensen & A. Podelski (Eds.), Proceedings TACAS 2004 (Vol. 2988, pp. 357–371). Springer.

Luo, J., Tu, H., Pattipati, K., Qiao, L., & Chigusa, S. (2005). Graphical models for diagnosis knowledge representation and inference. In Autotestcon. IEEE (p. 483-489).

Mahadevan, N., & Karsai, G. (2000–2014). Fact tool suite. https://fact.isis.vanderbilt.edu/.

Narasimhan, S., & Brownston, L. (2007). HyDE – a general framework for stochastic and hybrid model-based diagnosis. In Proc. of 18th international workshop on principles of diagnosis (DX ’07) (pp. 162–169).

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of plausible inference Morgan Kaufmann: .

Reed, E., Schumann, J., & Mengshoel, O. (2011). Verification and validation of system health management models using parametric testing. Proc. of Infotech@ Aerospace 2011.

RTCA. (2011). Do-178c: Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification. Retrieved from http://www.rtca.org

Schumann, J., Bajwa, A., Berg, P., & Thirumalainambi, R. (2010). Parametric testing of launch vehicle FDDR models. In AIAA Space.

Schumann, J., Gundy-Burlet, K., Pasareanu, C., Menzies, T., & Barrett, T. (2009). Software V&V support by parametric analysis of large software simulation systems. In Proc. IEEE Aerospace. IEEE Press.

Schumann, J., Srivastava, A., & Mengshoel, O. (2010). Who guards the guardians? — toward V&V of health management software. In RV 2010. Springer.

Schwabacher, M. A., Feather, M. S., & Markosian, L. Z. (2008). Verification and validation of advanced fault detection, isolation and recovery for a NASA space system. In Proc. PHM 2008.

Srivastava, A., & Schumann, J. (2013). Software health management: A necessity for safety critical systems. Innovations in Systems and SW Eng., 9(4), 219–233.
Section
Technical Research Papers