Probabilistic graphical models for diagnosing defectivity patterns

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 13, 2026
Leonardo Barbini Peter Kruizinga Micha Lipplaa Alvaro Piedrafita

Abstract

In the high-tech sector, diagnosing performance issues often involves analysing a variety of defectivity patterns on products. High-tech systems perform numerous processes – e.g. product handling, light projection, jetted ink application, and thermal treatments – all of which affect the quality of the product itself. Their potential malfunctioning can contribute to defects with characteristic patterns. Often there is not a one-to-one mapping between root causes of these malfunctions and the resulting observable defectivity patterns. Consequently, identifying the root cause of these patterns is a challenging and an intrinsically probabilistic task. This paper proposes a framework to relate these patterns to the underlying root causes and employs Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGM) to reason about these relations. We find that PGMs ability to contain arbitrary graph topologies and jointly reason across all root causes empowers the modeller to adapt the models to the system at hand and include domain specific knowledge that would be hard to account for using more data-driven approaches. When provided with data from an operational system in the field, the PGM identifies the underlying root causes of product quality issues. We demonstrate the methodology with a real use case from the production printing industry.

Abstract 24 | PDF Downloads 20

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

probabilistic graphical models, artificial intelligence, defectivity analysis, performance diagnostics, reasoning under uncertainty

References
Bai, J., Wu, D., Shelley, T., Schubel, P., Twine, D., Russell, J., . . . Zhang, J. (2025, April). A comprehensive survey on machine learning driven material defect detection. ACM Computing Surveys. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3730576 doi: 10.1145/3730576
Barbini, L., Bratosin, C., & Nägele, T. (2021). Embedding diagnosability of complex industrial systems into the design process using a model-based method-ology. PHM Society European Conference. doi: 10.36001/phme.2021.v6i1.2806
Cox, M., van de Laar, T., & de Vries, B. (2019). A factor graph approach to automated design of Bayesian signal processing algorithms. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 104, 185-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.11.002
Darwiche, P. A. (2009). Modeling and reasoning with bayesian networks. Cambridge University Press.
Gray, J. (2018). quimb: a python library for quantum information and many-body calculations. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(29), 819. doi: 10.21105/joss.00819
Henn, M.-A., Zhou, H., & Barnes, B. M. (2019, Sep). Data-driven approaches to optical patterned defect detection. OSA Continuum, 2(9), 2683–2693. doi: 10.1364/OSAC.2.002683
Kato, Z., & Zerubia, J. (2012). Markov Random Fields in Image Segmentation. Now Editor, World Scientific. Retrieved from https://inria.hal.science/hal-00737058
Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. MIT Press.
Liu, F., Lin, G., Qiao, R., & Shen, C. (2017, 03). Structured learning of tree potentials in crf for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, PP. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2690453
Murphy, K., Weiss, Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2013). Loopy belief propagation for approximate inference: An empirical study. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6725
Murphy, K. P. (2023). Probabilistic machine learning: Advanced topics. MIT Press. Retrieved from http://probml.github.io/book2
Pastorino, M., Moser, G., Serpico, S., & Zerubia, J. (2023, November). Learning CRF potentials through fully convolutional networks for satellite image semantic segmentation. In SITIS 2023 - 17th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology &Internet-Based Systems (p. 93-98). Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE. Retrieved from https://inria.hal.science/hal-04255319 doi: 10.1109/SITIS61268.2023.00023
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Särkkä S. Bayesian filtering and smoothing. Cambridge University Press.
van Gerwen, E., Barbini, L., Borth, M., & Passmann, R. (2024, 10). Efficient differential diagnosis using cost-aware active testing. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 15. doi: 10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i3.3849
Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., & Maciejewski, R. (2019, 11). Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review. Computational Social Networks, 6. doi: 10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y
Zhang, Z., Bu, J., Ester, M., Zhang, J., Li, Z., Yao, C., . . . Wang, C. (2023). Hierarchical multi-view graph pooling with structure learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(1), 545-559. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3090664
Section
Regular Session Papers