AI-Driven Design Optimization of Engineering Systems: A Case Study on Turboshaft Engines

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 13, 2026
Satish Thokala Peeyush

Abstract

In a typical engineering design, there are often many design parameters to consider. Also, there are multiple competing requirements and objectives to meet. Manual approach of adjusting the parameters to achieve specific objectives is not optimal especially as the design becomes complex.   

In the quest for optimizing complex engineering systems, the exploration of the design space becomes imperative, especially when dealing with multi-objective systems characterized by an array of independent variables. This paper presents a comprehensive study on the design space mapping of complex engineering systems, utilizing a turboshaft engine as a case study. The initial phase of our methodology employs a physics-based model to generate synthetic dataset, reflecting the intricate interplay of various system parameters underpinning the engine's operation. This synthesized data serves as a foundation for the subsequent development of a Machine Learning or Deep Learning based surrogate model. The surrogate AI model, will be crafted to encapsulate multiple inputs and outputs inherent in the turboshaft engine's functioning, thereby facilitating an efficient and accurate exploration of the design space.

Through this investigation, we will evaluate the efficacy of combining physics-based models with AI-driven techniques in mapping the design space of multi-objective systems. The core of our investigation revolves around the utilization of the AI surrogate model for achieving multi-objective optimization. This optimization process is not only focused on enhancing specific performance metrics but is also geared towards identifying a comprehensive family of feasible design solutions. Such an approach enables the delineation of the entire design space, offering invaluable insights into the trade-offs and synergies among different design objectives. Through this methodology, our goal is to uncover a wide spectrum of viable design alternatives, thereby providing a robust framework for decision-making in the engineering design process.

Abstract 49 | PDF Downloads 29

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

ROM, Deep learning, Design optimization, Turbofan, Aircraft engine, surrogate model

References
Jasper Sneok, Hugo larochelle, and Ryan P.Adams, “Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning
Algorithms”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, NIPS 2012.
Daniele Peri, “Machine Learning Algorithms in Design Optimization”, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11005
M. Inoue, H. Matsumoto and H. Takagi, "Acceptability of a Decision Maker to Handle Multi-objective Optimization on Design Space," 2020 Joint 11th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 21st International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (SCIS-ISIS), Hachijo Island, Japan, 2020, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/SCISISIS50064.2020.9322679.
https://www.mathworks.com/help/releases/R2024b/simscape/ug/brayton-cycle-gas-turbine-with custom components.html
https://www.mathworks.com/help/gads/paretosearchalgorithm.html
https://www.mathworks.com/products/reduced-ordermodeling.html
Section
Regular Session Papers