PHM-Vibench A unified, extensible, and reproducible vibration benchmarking framework for prognostics and health management
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) field faces significant challenges due to fragmented benchmarks, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and limited accessibility to comprehensive frameworks, particularly in the era of large-scale data and foundation models. To address these critical limitations, we introduce PHM-Vibench, a unified, extensible, and modular benchmarking platform for vibration-based PHM research. PHM-Vibench features a novel architecture that decouples the PHM pipeline into distinct data, model, task, and trainer factories, enabling flexible instantiation and customization of specific PHM workflows. The platform integrates comprehensive 20+ datasets with standardized protocols. It supports diverse PHM tasks including fault diagnosis, remaining useful life prediction, and anomaly detection. The framework addresses complex scenarios such as domain generalization, cross-system transfer, few-shot learning. Grounded in the Unified PHM Problem (UPHMP) framework with seven fundamental spaces: domain knowledge space (P), data space (D), task space (T), model space (M), loss function space (L), protocol space (Π), and evaluation metric space (E), PHM-Vibench enables systematic problem formalization and reproducible experimentation. The platform accommodates both traditional machine learning models and foundation models, with extensive experimental validation demonstrating superior cross-domain performance. PHMVibench addresses the standardization challenges in PHM research and provides a comprehensive solution for benchmarking and advancing the field. The platform is openly available at https://github.com/PHMbench/PHM-Vibench.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Prognostics and Health Management, Benchmark, Fault Diagnosis, Cross-domain, Cross-machine
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018, May). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834.
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., & Anandkumar, A. (2021). Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations.
Nie, Y., Nguyen, N. H., Sinthong, P., & Kalagnanam, J. (2023). A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers.
Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2008). Turbofan engine degradation simulation data set (c-MAPSS). NASA Prognostics Center of Excellence (PCoE) Data Repository.
Sol´ıs-Mart´ın, D., Galan-P ´ aez, J., & Borrego-D ´ ´ıaz, J. (2025). PHMD: An easy data access tool for prognosis and health management datasets. SoftwareX, 29, 102039.
Teubert, C., Jarvis, K., Corbetta, M., Kulkarni, C., & Daigle, M. (2023). ProgPy: Python packages for prognostics and health management of engineering systems. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(87), 5099.
von Hahn, T., & Mechefske, C. K. (2023, February). Computational Reproducibility Within Prognostics and Health Management. Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics, 42–50.
Wu, H., Hu, T., Liu, Y., Zhou, H., Wang, J., & Long, M. (2022). TimesNet: Temporal 2D-variation modeling for general time series analysis. , abs/2210.02186, null.
Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A. (2024). Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 255, 124678.
Zeng, A., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Xu, Q. (2022). Are transformers effective for time series forecasting?
Zhao, C., Zio, E., & Shen, W. (2024a, May). Domain generalization for cross-domain fault diagnosis: An applicationoriented perspective and a benchmark study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, 109964.
Zhao, C., Zio, E., & Shen, W. (2024b, May). Domain generalization for cross-domain fault diagnosis: An applicationoriented perspective and a benchmark study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, 109964.
Zhao, Z., Li, T., Wu, J., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2020, December). Deep learning algorithms for rotating machinery intelligent diagnosis: An open source benchmark study. ISA Transactions, 107, 224–255.
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., Yu, X., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2021). Applications of unsupervised deep transfer learning to intelligent fault diagnosis: A survey and comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 1–28.
Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108119.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.