PHM-Vibench A unified, extensible, and reproducible vibration benchmarking framework for prognostics and health management

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 13, 2026
Qi Li Bojian Chen Xuan Li Qitong Chen Liang Chen Changqing Shen Lu Lu Zhaoye Qin Fulei Chu

Abstract

 The Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) field faces significant challenges due to fragmented benchmarks, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and limited accessibility to comprehensive frameworks, particularly in the era of large-scale data and foundation models. To address these critical limitations, we introduce PHM-Vibench, a unified, extensible, and modular benchmarking platform for vibration-based PHM research. PHM-Vibench features a novel architecture that decouples the PHM pipeline into distinct data, model, task, and trainer factories, enabling flexible instantiation and customization of specific PHM workflows. The platform integrates comprehensive 20+ datasets with standardized protocols. It supports diverse PHM tasks including fault diagnosis, remaining useful life prediction, and anomaly detection. The framework addresses complex scenarios such as domain generalization, cross-system transfer, few-shot learning. Grounded in the Unified PHM Problem (UPHMP) framework with seven fundamental spaces: domain knowledge space (P), data space (D), task space (T), model space (M), loss function space (L), protocol space (Π), and evaluation metric space (E), PHM-Vibench enables systematic problem formalization and reproducible experimentation. The platform accommodates both traditional machine learning models and foundation models, with extensive experimental validation demonstrating superior cross-domain performance. PHMVibench addresses the standardization challenges in PHM research and provides a comprehensive solution for benchmarking and advancing the field. The platform is openly available at https://github.com/PHMbench/PHM-Vibench.

Abstract 68 | PDF Downloads 43

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Prognostics and Health Management, Benchmark, Fault Diagnosis, Cross-domain, Cross-machine

References
Feng, Y., Chen, J., Xie, J., Zhang, T., Lv, H., & Pan, T. (2022, January). Meta-learning as a promising approach for few-shot cross-domain fault diagnosis: Algorithms, applications, and prospects. Knowledge-Based Systems, 235, 107646.
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018, May). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834.
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., & Anandkumar, A. (2021). Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations.
Nie, Y., Nguyen, N. H., Sinthong, P., & Kalagnanam, J. (2023). A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers.
Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2008). Turbofan engine degradation simulation data set (c-MAPSS). NASA Prognostics Center of Excellence (PCoE) Data Repository.
Sol´ıs-Mart´ın, D., Galan-P ´ aez, J., & Borrego-D ´ ´ıaz, J. (2025). PHMD: An easy data access tool for prognosis and health management datasets. SoftwareX, 29, 102039.
Teubert, C., Jarvis, K., Corbetta, M., Kulkarni, C., & Daigle, M. (2023). ProgPy: Python packages for prognostics and health management of engineering systems. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(87), 5099.
von Hahn, T., & Mechefske, C. K. (2023, February). Computational Reproducibility Within Prognostics and Health Management. Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics, 42–50.
Wu, H., Hu, T., Liu, Y., Zhou, H., Wang, J., & Long, M. (2022). TimesNet: Temporal 2D-variation modeling for general time series analysis. , abs/2210.02186, null.
Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A. (2024). Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 255, 124678.
Zeng, A., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Xu, Q. (2022). Are transformers effective for time series forecasting?
Zhao, C., Zio, E., & Shen, W. (2024a, May). Domain generalization for cross-domain fault diagnosis: An applicationoriented perspective and a benchmark study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, 109964.
Zhao, C., Zio, E., & Shen, W. (2024b, May). Domain generalization for cross-domain fault diagnosis: An applicationoriented perspective and a benchmark study. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, 109964.
Zhao, Z., Li, T., Wu, J., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2020, December). Deep learning algorithms for rotating machinery intelligent diagnosis: An open source benchmark study. ISA Transactions, 107, 224–255.
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., Yu, X., Sun, C., Wang, S., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2021). Applications of unsupervised deep transfer learning to intelligent fault diagnosis: A survey and comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 1–28.
Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108119.
Section
Plenary Papers