Monotonic Latent Manifold Bayesian Inference for Robust Industrial Predictive Maintenance

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 23, 2026
Oyetayo Oyebisi

Abstract

Industrial predictive maintenance systems require not only accurate fault prediction but also reliable uncertainty estimation and robustness under noisy operational conditions. However, conventional deep learning approaches often produce temporally inconsistent failure trajectories and exhibit poor probabilistic calibration when exposed to stochastic sensor disturbances. This study proposes a Monotonic Latent Manifold Bayesian Neural Network (MM-BNN) framework for robust industrial predictive maintenance. The MM-BNN models degradation progression as a constrained non-decreasing latent probabilistic trajectory, thereby ensuring physically consistent temporal evolution while preserving Bayesian uncertainty quantification. A monotonic latent manifold update mechanism is introduced to enforce structured degradation dynamics across sequential observations. In addition, Bayesian posterior inference is performed using the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) to capture uncertainty in latent degradation states. The proposed MM-BNN framework is evaluated against multiple baseline models, including multilayer perceptron networks, gated recurrent units, random forests, support vector machines, XGBoost, and standard Bayesian neural networks. Experimental results demonstrate that the MM-BNN achieves superior discriminative performance with an average Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.772, outperforming competing approaches, most of which remain close to random classification performance. Reliability analysis further demonstrates improved probabilistic calibration, with a low Expected Calibration Error (ECE approx 0.034) and stable reliability behavior under increasing levels of stochastic noise. Ablation studies confirm that the monotonic degradation constraint is the primary factor driving predictive stability and robustness improvements. Furthermore, robustness experiments show that the MM-BNN maintains stable predictive performance even under severe noise perturbations. Overall, the findings indicate that the proposed MM-BNN framework provides a reliable, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware approach for predictive maintenance in safety-critical industrial environments.
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Predictive Maintenance, Bayesian Neural Networks, Uncertainty Quantification, Monotonic Learning, Prognostics and Health Management, No-U-Turn Sampler, Latent Manifold Learning, Industry 4.0, Physics-Informed Machine Learning, Industrial Prognostics, Bayesian Inference, Deep Learning, Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT, Fault Diagnosis

References
Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A.,Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... others (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai. Informationfusion, 58, 82–115.
Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A., Vita, R., Francisco, R. d. P.,Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 137,106024.
Chaudhry, S. (2024). Predictive maintenance in industrial internet of things: Current status. International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 6, 32–44.
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1050–1059).
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1321–1330).
Hoffman, M. D., Gelman, A., et al. (2014). The no-u-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15(1), 1593–1623.
Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
Kordestani, M., Orchard, M. E., Khorasani, K., & Saif, M.(2023). An overview of the state of the art in aircraft prognostic and health management strategies.
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–15.
Li, J., Zhao, M., Wang, R., & Chen, X. (2025). A comprehensive review of deep learning-based predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,255, 110512.
Mobley, R. K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance. Elsevier.14 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT
Neal, R. M. (2011). MCMC using hamiltonian dynamics.Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, 47–95.
Ochella, S., Dinmohammadi, F., & Shafiee, M. (2024).Bayesian neural networks for uncertainty quantification in remaining useful life prediction of systems with sensor
monitoring. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 16(7),16878132241239802.
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high-stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5),206215.
Runje, D., & Shankaranarayana, S. M. (2023). Constrained monotonic neural networks. In International Conference
on machine learning (pp. 29338–29353).
Sajjadi, P., Dinmohammadi, F., & Shafiee, M. (2025). Machine learning in prognostics and system health management of cyber-physical systems: A review. IEEE Access.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation–a review on the statistical data-driven approaches. European journal of operational
research, 213(1), 1–14.
Visconti, P., Rausa, G., Del-Valle-Soto, C., Velázquez, R.,Cafagna, D., & De Fazio, R. (2024). Machine learning and iot-based solutions in industrial applications for smart
manufacturing: a critical review. Future Internet, 16(11),394.
Wang, R., Dong, E., Cheng, Z., Liu, Z., & Jia, X. (2024).Transformer-based intelligent fault diagnosis methods of mechanical equipment: A survey. Open physics, 22(1),20240015.
Wehenkel, A., & Louppe, G. (2019). Unconstrained monotonic neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32.
Xu, Y., Kohtz, S., Boakye, J., Gardoni, P., & Wang, P. (2023).Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges.Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 230, 108900.
Zhang, Y., Wang, S., & Li, X. (2023). Predictive maintenance in smart manufacturing systems: A review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 121, 105987.
Zonta, T., Da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., De Lima, M. J.,Da Trindade, E. S., & Li, G. P. (2020). Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150, 106889.
Section
Technical Papers