Regularization of Divergent Series via Classical Summability Methods with Applications to Reliability and Engineering Systems

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 29, 2026
Suresh Kumar Sahani Kameshwar Sahani Aashiq Mahato Rishav Jha

Abstract

Accurate estimation of remaining useful life (RUL) from noisy and oscillatory degradation data remains a fundamental challenge in prognostics and health management (PHM), especially in safety-critical and resource-constrained settings. While modern data-driven methods achieve high predictive accuracy, they often require extensive training, lack interpretability, and provide limited guarantees on reliability. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a Cesàro-based regularization framework for constructing stable, interpretable, and conservative health indicators from degradation signals. The main objective is to develop a parameter-free and computationally efficient smoothing method that ensures safety-aware degradation tracking. The novelty of this work lies in adapting classical summability theory to PHM and establishing an explicit finite-sample bound that guarantees the smoothed estimate remains conservatively biased relative to the most recent observation, even under mild non-monotonic conditions. The method applies Cesàro averaging to a univariate health index derived from sensor fusion and is evaluated on NASA C-MAPSS FD001 and FD004 datasets using a consistent experimental framework. It is compared with standard smoothing techniques, including SMA, EWMA, Kalman filtering, and isotonic regression. Results show that the proposed approach achieves competitive or improved performance across RMSE, MAE, PHM score, and prognostic horizon, while significantly reducing variance and computational complexity. The Cesàro regularization provides a theoretically grounded, lightweight, and interpretable solution for degradation modeling. Its conservative nature enhances reliability, making it particularly suitable for real-time predictive maintenance applications in aerospace, energy, and industrial systems.

Abstract 5 | PDF Downloads 2

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Keywords: Cesàro summability, conservative regularization, degradation modeling, remaining useful life, prognostic health management, reliability engineering, non-increasing sequences

References
Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018). An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv:1803.01271.
Baptista, M., Henriques, E. M. P., & Goebel, K. (2023). Deep learning for remaining useful life prediction: A review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 241, 109648.
Brunk, H. D. (1955). Maximum likelihood estimates of monotone parameters. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 607-616.
Cesàro, E. (1890). Sur la multiplication des séries. Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, vol. 14, pp. 114-120.
Das, A. N., & Pratihar, D. K. (2023). Prognostics of turbofan engine using deep learning and ensemble of LSTM networks. Applied Soft Computing, vol. 145, 110601.
Gebraeel, N. Z., Elwany, A. H., & Pan, J. (2005). Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: A Bayesian approach. IIE Transactions, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 543-557.
Goebel, K., et al. (2017). Introduction to prognostics. In Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis Techniques for Complex Engineering Systems (pp. 1-33). Academic Press.
Hardy, G. H. (1949). Divergent series. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., & Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, vol. 585, no. 7825, pp. 357-362.
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1483-1510.
Jiang, Z., Zhang, W., & Yu, W. (2022). Remaining useful life prediction of turbofan engine based on dual-channel LSTM. IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 43642-43653.
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
Knopp, K. (1990). Theory and application of infinite series. New York, NY, USA: Dover.
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444.
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 104, pp. 799-834.
Li, X., Duan, F., Bennett, I., & Mba, D. (2022). Rotating machinery prognostics using state-space models and particle filters. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 2425-2436.
Liu, K., Zhang, W., & Jiang, Z. (2023). A survey on remaining useful life prediction methods for industrial equipment. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1703-1722.
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2019). Decoupled weight decay regularization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.
Mobley, R. K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance (2nd ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (2010). Discrete-time signal processing (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson.
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Köpf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., & Chintala, S. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32.
Pecht, M. (2008). Prognostics and health management of electronics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.
PHM Society. (2010). PHM10 Data Challenge - Scoring. www.phmsociety.org/phm10-data-challenge-scoring
Ramasso, E., & Saxena, A. (2014). Performance benchmarking and analysis of prognostic methods for CMAPSS datasets. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-18.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Balaban, E., Goebel, K., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Schwabacher, M. (2008). Metrics for evaluating performance of prognostic techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, pp. 1-17.
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, pp. 1-9.
Shakoor, M. A. Z., Do, T. T., & Shao, L. (2022). Edge intelligence for industrial IoT: A review. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23438-23457.
Sharaf, M. F. U., Zualkernan, I. A., & Hussain, F. K. (2023). Predicting remaining useful life of turbofan engines using a hybrid approach. IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 34784-34797.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation - A review on statistical data-driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30.
Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Addepalli, S. (2023). Remaining useful life prediction using deep learning approaches: A survey. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 235, 109954.
Westerhuis, J. A., Kourti, T., & MacGregor, J. F. (1999). Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data. Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 13, no. 3-4, pp. 397-413.
Whitmore, G. A., & Schenkelberg, F. (1997). Modelling accelerated degradation data using Wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation. Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27-45.
Zhang, C., Chen, J., & Guo, F. (2023). A transformer-based approach for remaining useful life prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 188, 109972.
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 213-237.
Zheng, S., Ristovski, K., Farahat, A., & Gupta, C. (2018). Long short-term memory network for RUL estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, pp. 1-5.
Zhu, J., Chen, N., & Peng, W. (2019). Estimation of bearing remaining useful life based on multiscale convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 3208-3216.
Zygmund, A. (2002). Trigonometric series (3rd ed.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Section
Technical Papers