Time to Replace? A Guide for Sustainable Engine Maintenance Strategies

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 11, 2025
Anne Oestreicher
Tim Hoff
Ahmad Ali Pohya
Gerko Wende

Abstract

Aircraft engine maintenance planning is traditionally focusing on questions of economic optimization. This includes repair-versus-replacement decisions and the cost-effective scheduling of maintenance events and relies on operational data, shop visit forecasts, and contractual obligations. Although this approach has been subject of extensive study, the integration of environmental considerations into maintenance planning remains largely overlooked. For example, replacing Life Limited Parts (LLPs) in shorter intervals can improve engine efficiency and reduce fuel consumption, but increases material demand and lead to a higher number of shop visits, causing additional environmental impacts. Postponing replacement conserves resources but may lead to higher operational inefficiencies and greater fuel consumption. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the environmental consequences associated with the timing and frequency of LLP replacements. Furthermore, it analyses the impact of different replacement intervals on climate change, material resource consumption and engine performance. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study is conducted to quantify the environmental impacts of replacing LLPs at shorter intervals versus an optimized replacement interval. By varying the LLP usage, this study demonstrates how longer utilization influences the overall environmental impacts. These repercussions are compared to increased fuel consumption due to engine degradation by using a simplified engine performance degradation approach. The findings of the study indicate the significance of varying impacts of different replacement intervals on the overall environmental performance. Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of recycling strategies for improving resource efficiency and sustainability in engine maintenance.

Abstract 5 | PDF Downloads 2

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

engine maintenance, maintenance strategies, life cycle assessment, life limited parts

References
Ackert, S. (2011). Engine Maintenance Concepts for Financiers.
Aerotime. (2023). The critical challenge of titanium shortages in MRO supply chains.
Airbus. (2022). End-of-life Reusing, recycling, rethinking.
Aircraft Commerce. (2008). Owner’s & Operator’s Guide: V2500. AIRCRAFT COMMERCE, 56, 10–36.
Andreasi Bassi, S., Biganzoli, F., Ferrara, N., & Amadei, A. (2023). Updated characterisation and normalisation factors for the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Luxembourg. doi: 10.2760/798894
Bouabid, D., Hadef, H., & Innal, F. (2024). Maintenance as a sustainability tool in high-risk process industries: A review and future directions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 89, 105318. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105318
Bugaj, M., Urminsky, T., Rostas, J., & Pecho, P. (2019). Aircraft maintenance reserves – new approach to optimization. Transportation Research Procedia, 43, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.12.016
Burton, J. (2022). U.S. Geological Survey.
Cavalcante, C. A. V., Scarf, P., Melo, Y. R., Rodrigues, A. J. S., & Alotaibi, N. (2024). Planning maintenance when resources are limited: a study of periodic opportunistic replacement. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 35(4), 573–593. doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpae015
Cerdeira, J., Lopes, I., & Silva, E. (2017). Scheduling the Repairment of Aircrafts’ Engines. In 2017 International Conference on Control, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics & Optimization (ICCAIRO) (pp. 259–267). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIRO.2017.56
Dinesh Kumar, U., Crocker, J., & Knezevic, J. (1999). Evolutionary maintenance for aircraft engines. Annual Reliability and Maintainability, 1999, 62–68. doi: 10.1109/RAMS.1999.744098
Dubois, T. (2025). European Industry Faces Titanium Supply Risk, Consultancy Says.
European Commission. (2022a). Critical Raw Materials Act.
European Commission. (2022b). Fly the Green Deal – Europe’s vision for sustainable aviation. doi: 10.2777/732726
European Commission. (2023). Critical and strategic materials.
European Commission. (2025). The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation. European Committee for Standardization. (2006). ISO
14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (Vol. 13.020.10; 13.020.60) (No. 14040:2006). Berlin.
European Committee for Standardization. (2018). ISO 14044: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines (No. 14044:2018-05). Berlin.
Figueroa Mayordomo, A., Ghobbar, A., Ghijs, S., & Cator, E. (2010). Engine Management: A Decision Support Tool for Strategic Engine Maintenance Planning. In 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi: 10.2514/6.2010-9146
Fornlöf, V., Galar, D., Syberfeldt, A., & Almgren, T. (2016). On-Condition Parts Versus Life Limited Parts: A Trade off in Aircraft Engines. Current Trends in Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety, 253–262. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23597-4 19
Ghobbar, A., Cator, E., & Mayordomo, A. (2013). A Decision Support Tool for Strategic Engine Maintenance Planning and Life Limited Parts. In J. Stjepandic (Ed.), Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environments. Springer Verlag London.
Hoff, T., Sprecher, B., Pohya, A., Wende, G., & Peck, D. (2025). The Impact of Circular Strategies on Titanium Supply and Demand in the Aviation Industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
Hoff, T., Sprecher, B., Wende, G., & Peck, D. (2024). Sustainable Titanium Supply - Circular Economy Practices versus Rising Aviation Demand.
IAEG. (2024). Guidance for Calculating Aviation Scope 3 Emissions: Category 11 – Use of Sold Products. Jenkinson, L., Simpkin, P., & Rhodes, D. (1999). Civil Jet Aircraft Design. Elsevier. doi: 10.2514/4.473500
Justin, C., & Mavris, D. (2015). Aircraft and engine economic evaluation for fleet renewal decision-making and maintenance contract valuation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 229(11), 2051–2065. doi: 10.1177/0954410014564403
Karki, B., & Porras, J. (2021). Digitalization for sustainable maintenance services: A systematic literature review. Digital Business, 1(2), 100011. doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100011
Mutel, C. (2017). Brightway: An Open Source Framework for Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Open Source Software, 2(12), 236. doi: 10.21105/joss.00236
Oestreicher, A., Kaup, N., Rahn, A., Koffler, J., & Wende, G. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment of Turbofan Engines: A Reverse Engineering Approach. 32th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Conference.
Oestreicher, A., Rahn, A., Ramm, J., Städing, J., Keller, C., Wicke, K., & Wende, G. (2024). Sustainable Engine Maintenance: Evaluating the Ecological Impact of Life Limited Part Replacement. ICAS Proceedings 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Florence, Italy.
Rahn, A., Schuch, M., Wicke, K., Sprecher, B., Dransfeld, C., & Wende, G. (2024). Beyond flight operations: Assessing the environmental impact of aircraft maintenance through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 453, 142195. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142195
Seemann, R., Langhans, S., Schilling, T., & Gollnick, V. (2011). Modeling the life cycle cost of jet engine maintenance. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress.
Stojiljkovic, B., Vasov, L., Cokorilo, O., & Vorotovic, G. (2021). An analytical model of the replacement costs of aircraft engine life-limited parts. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 93(5), 776–782. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-12-2020-0297
Sun, J., Sun, Y., Chen, D., & Liu, H. (2023). An integrated life-cycle maintenance modeling and simulation framework for aero engine fleet management decision support. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 237(3), 604–616. doi: 10.1177/1748006X221099767
U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration. (2017). Adcisory Circular Guidance Material for Aircraft Engine Life-Limited Parts Requirements: AC 33.70-1.
Vasíc, S., Orosnjak, M., Brkljac, N., Vrhovac, V., & Ristíc, K. (2024). Identification of Criteria for Enabling the Adoption of Sustainable Maintenance Practice: An Umbrella Review. Sustainability, 16(2), 767. doi: 10.3390/su16020767
Voigt, J., Wein, L., Werner-Spatz, C., Städing, J., Ziaja, K., Di Mare, F., . . . Seume, J. R. (2023). MRO of Current and Future Engine Technologies – Climate Impact, Economic Potential, and Scientific Challenges. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2023.
Vrignat, P., Kratz, F., & Avila, M. (2022). Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108140. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108140
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218–1230. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Yu, B., Fu, X., Jiang, W., & Bai, Z. (2022). Exchange problem optimization between aeroengines with multiple modules and lifelimited parts. Prognostics and Health Management Conference, 2022, 90–96. doi: 10.1109/PHM2022-London52454.2022.00024
Section
Technical Papers