Telemetry Monitoring System with Features Explaining Anomalies Based on Mahalanobis Distance
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7289-2076
Hironori Sahara
Abstract
Because satellites cannot be repaired once launched, operators must detect anomalies early and prevent failures before they occur. Thus, satellite telemetry monitoring systems need to alert operators of anomalies and provide them with useful information to deal with these anomalies. However, traditional knowledge-based monitoring systems have the challenges of difficulty in building comprehensive models and a high dependency on experts. In recent years, data-driven approaches have been actively studied with the development of machine learning algorithms. These approaches solve the challenges of knowledge-based methods; however, they are often less capable of explaining anomalies than knowledge-based methods. In this study, we propose the new telemetry monitoring system with feature engineering to explain anomalies. The proposed method realizes identifiability of anomaly types and unusual telemetry by designing features based on moving averages, telemetry periods, waveform differences, and the Mahalanobis distance. We applied the proposed features to artificial and practical abnormal datasets and evaluated their usefulness. The results showed that the proposed method is capable of identifying trend, periodic, and waveform anomalies, specifying the telemetry in which the anomaly occurred and providing the information to operators.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Prognostics and health management, Mahalanobis distance, Anomaly detection, Telemetry monitoring, Feature engineering
Chen, J., Pi, D., Wu, Z., Zhao, X., Pan, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Imbalanced satellite telemetry data anomaly detection model based on bayesian LSTM, Acta Astronautica, 180, 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.012
Cui, L., Zhang, Q., Shi, Y., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Wang, J., & Bai, C. (2023). A method for satellite time series anomaly detection based on fast-DTW and improved-KNN, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 36(2), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.001
Hundman, K., Constantinou, V. Laporte, C., Colwell, I., & Soderstrom, T. (2018). Detecting spacecraft anomalies using LSTMs and nonparametric dynamic thresholding, Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219845
Mizutani, M., Hirose, T., Takaki, R., & Honda, H. (2009). ISACS-DOC: monitoring and diagnostic system for AKARI and HINODE, Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 7(ists26), Tf_1-Tf_6. https://doi.org/10.2322/tstj.7.Tf_1
Mota-Gutiérrez, C. G., Reséndiz-Flores, E. O., & Reyes-Carlos Y.I. (2018). Mahalanobis-Taguchi system: state of the art, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(3), 596-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2016-0174
Pilastre, B., Boussouf, L., D’Escrivan, S., & Tourneret, J.-Y. (2020). Anomaly detection in mixed telemetry data using a sparse representation and dictionary learning, Signal Processing, 168, 107320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107320
Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J. R., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., Dietterich, T. G., & Muller, K.-R. (2021). A unifying review of deep and shallow anomaly detection, Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 756-795. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3052449
Sakurada, M. & Yairi, T. (2014). Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Proceedings of the MLSDA 2014 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Sensory Data Analysis, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2689746.2689747
Tariq, S., Lee, S., Shin, Y., Lee, M. S., Jung, O., Chung, D., & Woo, S. S. (2019). Detecting anomalies in space using multivariate convolutional LSTM with mixtures of probabilistic PCA, Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2123-2133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330776
Umezu, R., Sugie, T., Nagase, M., Kokai, R., Takeshima, T., Ebisawa, K., Mitsuda, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2019). Detection of failure sign of spacecraft using machine learning, JAXA Research and Development Report: Journal of Space Science Informatics Japan, 8, 11-20. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.20637/JAXA-RR-18-008/0002
Williams, B. C. & Nayak, P. P. (1996). A model-based approach to reactive self-configuring systems, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 13, 971-978.
Woodall, W. H., Koudelik, R., Tsui, K.-L., Kim, S. B., Stoumbos, Z. G., & Carvounis, C. P. (2003). A review and analysis of the Mahalanobis—Taguchi system, Technometrics, 45(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017002188618626
Wu, J., Yao, L., Liu, B., Ding, Z., & Zhang, L. (2020). Combining OC-SVMs with LSTM for detecting anomalies in telemetry data with irregular intervals, IEEE Access, 8, 106648-106659. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000859
Xiong, L., Ma, H.-D., Fang, H.-Z., Zou, K.-X., & Yi, D.-W. (2011). Anomaly detection of spacecraft based on least squares support vector machine, 2011 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2011.5939470
Yairi, T., Takeishi, N., Oda, T., Nakajima, Y., Nishimura, N., & Takata, N. (2017). A data-driven health monitoring method for satellite housekeeping data based on probabilistic clustering and dimensionality reduction, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 53(3), 1384-1401. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2671247
Yairi, T., Fukushima, Y., Liew, C. F., Sakai, Y., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2021). A data-driven approach to anomaly detection and health monitoring for artificial satellites, Advances in Condition Monitoring and Structural Health Monitoring, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9199-0_13
Yepmo, V., Smits, G., & Pivert, O. (2022). Anomaly explanation: a review, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 137, 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101946