A Bayesian Approach to Fault Identification in the Presence of Multi-component Degradation



Published Nov 16, 2020
Yufei Lin Skaf Zakwan Ian Jennions


Fault diagnosis typically consists of fault detection, isolation and identification. Fault detection and isolation determine the presence of a fault in a system and the location of the fault. Fault identification then aims at determining the severity level of the fault. In a practical sense, a fault is a conditional interruption of the system ability to achieve a required function under specified operating condition; degradation is the deviation of one or more characteristic parameters of the component from acceptable conditions and is often a main cause for fault generation. A fault occurs when the degradation exceeds an allowable threshold. From the point a new aircraft takes off for the first time all of its components start to degrade, and yet in almost all studies it is presumed that we can identify a single fault in isolation, i.e. without considering multi-component degradation in the system. This paper proposes a probabilistic framework to identify a single fault in an aircraft fuel system with consideration of multi-component degradation. Based on the conditional probabilities of sensor readings for a specific fault, a Bayesian method is presented to integrate distributed sensory information and calculate the likelihood of all possible fault severity levels. The proposed framework is implemented on an experimental aircraft fuel rig which illustrates the applicability of the proposed method.

Abstract 298 | PDF Downloads 239



Fault identification, Bayesian method, Multi-component degradation, Aircraft fuel rig

Alaa A. J., & Robert B. (2016). Fault diagnosis of industrial robot bearings based on discrete wavelet transform and artificial neural network. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, ISSN 2153-2648, 2016 017.
Amoozgar M. H., Chamseddine A., & Zhang Y. M. (2013). Experimental test of a two-stage Kalman filter for actuator fault detection and diagnosis of an unmanned quadrotor helicopter. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 70, issue 1, pp. 107-117.
Bouzida A., Touhami O., Ibtiouen R., Belouchrani A., Fadel M., & Rezzoug A. (2011). Fault diagnosis in industrial induction machines through discrete wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4385-4395.
Caliskan F., Zhang Y., Wu N. Eva, & Shin Jong-Yeob (2014). Actuator fault diagnosis in a Boeing 747 model via adaptive modified two-stage Kalman filter. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2014.
Chen F., Tang B. P., & Chen R. X. (2013). A novel fault diagnosis model for gearbox based on wavelet support vector machine with immune genetic algorithm. Measurement, vol. 46, issue 1, pp. 220-232.
Chien, C. F., Chen, S. L., & Lin, Y. S. (2002). Using Bayesian network for fault location on distribution feeder. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 17(13), pp. 785-793.
Dey S., & Stori J. A. (2005). A Bayesian network approach to root cause diagnosis of process variations. International Journal of Machine Tools, vol. 45(1), pp. 75-91.
Ehsan M., & Morteza M. (2015). A fuzzy-based gas turbine fault detection and identification system for full and part-load performance deterioration. Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 46, pp. 82-93.
Gertler J., & McAvoy T. J. (1997). Principal component analysis and parity relations–strong duality. IFAC Safe Process, vol. 2, pp. 837-842.
Jackson T., Austin J., Fletcher M., Jessop M., Liang B., Pasley A., Ong M., Ren X., Allan G., Kadirkamanathan V., Thompson H. A., & Fleming P. J. (2005). Distributed health monitoring for aero-engines on the GRID: DAME. Proceeding of IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 3738-3747.
Macgregor J. (1989). Multivariate Statistical Methods for Monitoring Large Datasets from Chemical Processes. AIChE meeting, San Francisco.
Mehranbod N., Soroush, M., & Panjapornpon, C. (2005). A method of sensor fault detection and identification. Journal of Process Control, vol. 15(3), pp. 321-339.
Meskin N., Naderi E., & Khorasani K. (2013). A multiple model-based approach for fault diagnosis of jet engines. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 254-262.
Muralidharan V., & Sugumaran V. (2012). A comparative study of Naïve Bayes classifier and Bayes net classifier for fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using wavelet analysis. Applied Soft Computing, vol. 12, issue 8, pp. 2023-2029.
Niculita O., Skaf Z., & Jennions, I. K. (2014). The application of Bayesian change point detection in UAV fuel systems. 3rd International Conference on Through-life Engineering Services.
Poon, J., Konstantakopoulos I.C., Spanos C., & Sanders S. R. (2015). Real-time model-based fault diagnosis for switching power converters. Applied power electronics conference and exposition (APEC), IEEE, March 15-19.
Saimurugan, M., & Nithesh, R. (2016). Intelligent fault diagnosis model for rotating machinery based on fusion of sound signals. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, ISSN 2153-2648, 2016 018.
Steinder M., & Sethi A. S. (2004). Probabilistic fault localization in communication systems using belief networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 12(5), pp. 809-822.
Tayarani-Bathaie S. S, Sadough Vanini Z.N., & Khorasani K. (2014). Dynamic neural network-based fault diagnosis of gas turbine engines. Neurocomputing, vol. 125, pp. 153-165.
William, V. (2010). Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications. NASA, Rev.
Yang F., Shah S. L., & Xiao D. Y. (2012). Signed directed graph based modelling and its validation from process knowledge and process data. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41-53.
Yang Z. L., Wang B., Dong X. H., & Liu H. (2012). Expert system of fault diagnosis for gear box in wind turbine. Systems Engineering Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 189-195.
Zhang X., & Pisu P. (2014). An unscented Kalman filter based on-line diagnostic approach for PEM fuel cell flooding. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management 1(5).
Technical Papers