Impact of Prognostic Uncertainty in System Health Monitoring



Published Nov 3, 2020
Robert M. Vandawaker David R. Jacques Jason K. Freels


Across many industries, systems are exceeding their intended design lives, whether they are ships, bridges or military aircraft. As a result failure rates can increase and unanticipated wear or failure conditions can arise. Health monitoring research and application has the potential to more safely lengthen the service life of a range of systems through utilization of sensor data and knowledge of failure mechanisms to predict component life remaining. A further benefit of health monitoring when combined across an entire platform is system health management. System health management is an enabler of condition based maintenance, which allows repair or replacement based on material condition, not a set time. Replacement of components based on condition can enable cost savings through fewer parts being used and the associated maintenance costs. The goal of this research is to show the management of system health can provide savings in maintenance and logistics cost while increasing vehicle availability through the approach of condition based maintenance.
This work examines the impact of prediction accuracy uncertainty in remaining useful life prognostics for a squadron of 12 aircraft. The uncertainty in this research is introduced in the system through an uncertainty factor applied to the useful life prediction. An ARENA discrete event simulation is utilized to explore the effect of prediction error on availability, reliability, and maintenance and logistics processes. Aircraft are processed through preflight, flight, and post-flight operations, as well as maintenance and logistics activities. A baseline case with traditional time driven maintenance is performed for comparison to the condition based maintenance approach of this research.
This research does not consider cost or decision making processes, instead focusing on utilization parameters of both aircraft and manpower. The occurrence and impact of false alarms on system performance is examined. The results show the potential availability, reliability, and maintenance benefits of a health monitoring system and explore the diagnostic uncertainty.

Abstract 554 | PDF Downloads 11025



detection uncertainty, Condition Based Maintenance CBM, analysis of alternatives

Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness. (May, 2008). Condition based maintenance plus DoD guidebook. Washington, D.C.:
Ellis, B. (2008). Condition based maintenance. The Jethro Project, November 10, 1-5.
Glaser, S. D., Li, H., Wang, M. L., Ou, J., & Lynch, J. (2007). Sensor technology innovation for the advancement of structural health monitoring: A strategic program of US-china research for the next decade. Smart Structures and Systems, 3(2), 221-244.
Gorinevsky, D., Gordon, G. A., Beard, S., Kumar, A., & Chang, F. (2005). Design of integrated SHM systems for commercial aircraft applications. 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA. (September) 1-8.
Hoyle, C., Mehr, A., Turner, I., & Chen, W. (2007). On quantifying cost-benefit of ISHM in aerospace systems. Paper presented at the Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE, 1-7.
Kahlert, A., Giljohann, S., & Klingauf, U. (2014). Cost-benefit analysis and specification of component-level PHM systems in aircrafts Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society,
Nelms, D. (2008). Keeping the big boys flying. Aviation Today.
Pattabhiraman, S., Kim, N. H., & Haftka, R. T. (2010). Effects of uncertainty reduction measures by structural health monitoring on safety and lifecycle cost of airplanes. Paper presented at the 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 12, 2010 - April 15,
Pryor, G. A. (2008). Methodology for estimation of operational availability as applied to military systems. ITEA Journal, (29), 420-428.
Rebulanan, R. (2000). Simulation of the joint strike fighter's (JSF) autonomic logistics system (ALS) using the java' programming language (Master's Thesis).
ReliaSoft. (2007). Reliability basics: Availabiltiy and the different ways to calculate it. Reliability Hotwire, 79
Roach, D. (2009). Real time crack detection using mountable comparative vacuum monitoring sensors. Smart Structures and Systems, 5(4), 317-328.
Rodrigues, L. R., & Yoneyama, T. (2012). Spare parts inventory control for non-repairable items based on prognostics and health monitoring information. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.
Rodrigues, L. R., & Yoneyama, T. (2013). Maintenance planning optimization based on PHM information and spare parts availability. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2013, New Orleans, LA.
Sankararaman, S., Daigle, M., Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2013). Analytical algorithms to quantify the uncertainty in remaining useful life prediction. Paper presented at the Aerospace Conference, 2013 IEEE, 1-11.
Scanff, E., Feldman, K. L., Ghelam, S., Sandborn, P., Glade, M., & Foucher, B. (2007). Life cycle cost impact of using prognostic health management (PHM) for helicopter avionics. Microelectronics Reliability, 47(12), 1857-1864.
Shalal-Esa, A. (2013, 21 Oct). Insight: Lockheed's F-35 logistics system revolutionary but risky. Reuters
Shoup, L., Donohue, N., & Lang, M. (2011). The fix we're in for: The state of our nation's bridges. ().Transportation for America.
Speckmann, H. (2007). Structural health monitoring systems in airbus military. IMRBPB Meeting, Cologne, Germany. 1-33.
Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L). (May 2008). Condition based maintenance plus (CBM+) DoD guidebook. Washington, D.C.:
Van Horenbeek, A., Van Ostaeyen, J., Duflou, J. R., & Pintelon, L. (2013). Quantifying the added value of an imperfectly performing condition monitoring system—Application to a wind turbine gearbox. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 111(0), 45-57.
Walls, M. R., Thomas, M. E., & Brady, T. F. (1999). Improving system maintenance decisions: A value of information framework. Engineering Economist, 44(2), 151.
Technical Papers