A Systematic Methodology for Gearbox Health Assessment and Fault Classification

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 1, 2011
Hassan x Hassan Al-Atat David Siegel Jay Lee

Abstract

A systematic methodology for gearbox health assessment and fault classification is developed and evaluated for 560 data sets of gearbox vibration data provided by the Prognostics and Health Management Society for the 2009 data challenge competition. A comprehensive set of signal processing and feature extraction methods are used to extract over 200 features, including features extracted from the raw time signal, time synchronous signal, wavelet decomposition signal, frequency domain spectrum, envelope spectrum, among others. A regime segmentation approach using the tachometer signal, a spectrum similarity metric, and gear mesh frequency peak information are used to segment the data by gear type, input shaft speed, and braking torque load. A health assessment method that finds the minimum feature vector sum in each regime is used to classify and find the 80 baseline healthy data sets. A fault diagnosis method based on a distance calculation from normal along with specific features correlated to different fault signatures is used to diagnosis specific faults. The fault diagnosis method is evaluated for the diagnosis of a gear tooth breakage; input shaft imbalance, bent shaft, bearing inner race defect, and bad key, and the method could be further extended for other faults as long as a set of features can be correlated with a known fault signature. Future work looks to further refine the distance calculation algorithm for fault diagnosis, as well as further evaluate other signal processing method such as the empirical mode decomposition to see if an improved set of features can be used to improve the fault diagnosis accuracy.

Abstract 187 | PDF Downloads 239

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Gearbox Health Assessment

References
J. Antoni, and R.B. Randall (2006). The spectral kurtosis: application to the vibratory surveillance and diagnostics of rotating machines, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, pp. 308-331.
J.Antoni. (2006). The spectral kurtosis: a useful tool for characterizing nonstationary signals, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, pp. 282-307.
E. Bechhoefer, and A. Bearnhard (2003). Setting HUMS Condition Indicator Thresholds by Modeling Aircraft and Torque Band Variance, IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings.
F.K. Choy, S. Huang, J.J. Zakrajsek, R.F. Handschuh, and D.P. Townsend (2004). Vibration signature analysis of a faulted gear transmission system, NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA TM-106623/ARL-TR 475/AIAA-94-2937.
H.J. Decker, and D.G. Lewicki. (2003). Spiral Bevel Pinion Crack Detection in a Helicopter Gearbox, ARL-TR-2958, U.S. Army Research laboratory, NASA Lewis.
P. Grabill, J. Berry, L. Grant, and J. Porter. (2001). Automated Helicopter Vibration Diagnosistcs for the US Army and National Guard, 57th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, pp.1831-1842.
J. Keller and P. Grabill. (2003). Vibration Monitoring of UH-60A Main Transmission Planetary Carrier Fault, The American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona.
B. Li, M. Chow, Y. Tipsuwan, and J. Hung (2000). Neural-Network Based Motor Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, pp. 1060-1069.
J. Ma. (1995). Energy Operator and Other Demodulation Approaches to Gear Defect Detection, Proceedings of the 49th Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology, Vibration Institute, Willobrook, Illinois, pp.127-140.
Z.K. Peng, and F.L. Chu. (2003). Application of the wavelet transform in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnostics: a review with bibliography, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 18, pp. 199-221.
PHM 2009 Data challenge Competition, (2009). [http://www.phmsociety.org/competition/09]
PHM Society Public Datasets, (2009).PHM 2009 Data challenge Competition, Labeled Dataset. [https://www.phmsociety.org/references/datasets]
P.D. Samuel and D.J. Pines. (2005). A review of vibration-based techniques for helicopter transmission diagnostics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 282, pp. 475-508.
J. Sheeley, R. Xu, Z. Ren, B. Ayhan, W. Lee, M.S. Sahni, Hu Qiaohui, and T. McClerran (2009). Initial Operational Evaluation of a Novel Corona Monitoring System, Proceedings of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology (MFPT).
P.W. Tse, Y.H. Peng, and R. Yam (2001). Wavelet Analysis and Envelope Detection for Rolling Element Bearing Fault Diagnosis-Their Effectiveness and Flexibilities, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol.123, pp.303-310.
P. Vecer, M. Kreidl, and R. Smid (2005). Condition Indicators for Gearbox Condition Monitoring Systems, Acata Polytechnica, vol. 45, No. 6
H. Zheng, Z. Li, and X. Chen. (2002). Gear fault diagnosis based on the continuous wavelet transform, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol.16, pp. 447-457.
Section
Technical Papers