Hybrid Prognostics for Aircraft Fuel System: An Approach to Forecasting the Future

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Shuai Fu Nicolas P. Avdelidis

Abstract

The copious volumes of data collected incessantly from diverse systems present challenges in interpreting the data to predict system failures. The majority of large organizations employ highly trained experts who specialize in using advanced maintenance equipment and have specific certification in predictive maintenance (PdM). Prognostics and health management (PHM) connects research on deterioration models to strategies for PdM. Prognostics refer to the process of estimating the time until failure and the associated risk for one or more current and potential failure modes. Prognostics aim to provide guidance by alerting to imminent failures and predicting the remaining useful life (RUL). This eventually leads to improved availability, dependability, and safety, while also reducing maintenance costs. This research work diverges from existing established prognostic methodologies by emphasising the use of hybrid prognostics to predict the future performance of an aircraft system, especially the point in which the system will cease to operate as intended, often referred to as its time to failure. We have developed a new method that combines a physics-based model with the physics of failure (PoF) and a multiple-layered hyper-tangent-infused data-driven approach. The results are useful. The authors retrieved datasets for analysis using a laboratory aircraft fuel system and simulation model. Consequently, the comparative results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid prognostic approach properly estimates the RUL and demonstrates strong application, availability, and precision.

How to Cite

Fu, S., & Avdelidis, N. P. (2024). Hybrid Prognostics for Aircraft Fuel System: An Approach to Forecasting the Future. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4130
Abstract 610 | PDF Downloads 268

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

health management, physics of failure, hybrid prognostics, aircraft fuel system, remaining useful life

References
Ahmadzadeh, F., & Lundberg, J. (2014). Remaining useful life estimation: review. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 5(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-013-0195-0
Chao, M. A., Kulkarni, C., Goebel, K., & Fink, O. (2021). Aircraft engine run-to-failure dataset under real flight conditions for prognostics and diagnostics. Data, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6010005
Douglas Goodman, James P. Hofmeister, & Ferenc Szidarovszky. (2019). Prognostics and health management : a practical approach to improving system reliability using conditioned-based data.
Eker, O. F., Camci, F., & Jennions, I. K. (2019a). A New Hybrid Prognostic Methodology. In International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management.
Eker, O. F., Camci, F., & Jennions, I. K. (2019b). A new hybrid prognostic methodology. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 10.
Elattar, H. M., Elminir, H. K., & Riad, A. M. (2016). Prognostics: a literature review. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-016-0019-3
Fu, S., & Avdelidis, N. P. (2023). Prognostic and Health Management of Critical Aircraft Systems and Components: An Overview. Sensors, 23(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198124
Fu, S., Avdelidis, N. P., & Jennions, I. K. (2023). A Prognostic Approach to Improve System Reliability for Aircraft System. 2023 7th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS59833.2023.10381117
Galar, D., Goebel, K., Sandborn, P., & Kumar, U. (2021). Prognostics and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Estimation: Predicting with Confidence. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003097242
Gu, J., & Pecht, M. (2008). Prognostics and health management using physics-of-failure. 2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925843
Hofmeister, J., Szidarovszky, F., & Goodman, D. (2017, March). AN APPROACH TO PROCESSING CONDITION-BASED DATA FOR USE IN PROGNOSTIC ALGORITHMS.
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2005.09.012
Li, Z., Wu, D., Hu, C., & Terpenny, J. (2019). An ensemble learning-based prognostic approach with degradation-dependent weights for remaining useful life prediction. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 184, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.016
Liao, L., & Köttig, F. (2014). Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 63(1), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2014.2299152
Losik, L. (2012). Using the prognostic health management program on the air force next generation reusable launch vehicle. AIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition 2012.
McCollom, N. N., & Brown, E. R. (2011). PHM on the F-35 fighter. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, PHM 2011 - Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2011.6024363
Nieto, P. J. G., García-Gonzalo, E., Sánchez, A. B., & Fernández, M. M. (2016). A new predictive model based on the abc optimized multivariate adaptive regression splines approach for predicting the remaining useful life in aircraft engines. Energies, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/en9060409
Orsagh, R. F., Sheldon, J., & Klenke, C. J. (2003). Prognostics/diagnostics for gas turbine engine bearings. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 7, 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2003.1234152
Vohnout, S., Bodden, D., Kim, B. U., Wagoner, R., Kunst, N., Edwards, P., Gleeson, B., Cascio, D., Brzuszkiewicz, S., Wagemans, R., Rounds, M., & Clements, N. S. (2012). Prognostic-enabling of an electrohydrostatic actuator (EHA) system. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2012, PHM 2012, 437–448.
Section
Technical Papers