False alarm reduction in railway track quality inspections using machine learning

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Isidro Durazo-Cardenas
Bernadin Namoano Andrew Starr Ram Dilip Sala Jichao Lai

Abstract

Track quality geometry measurements are crucial for the railways’ timely maintenance. Regular measurements prevent train delays, passenger discomfort and incidents. However, current fault diagnosis or parameter deviation relies on simple threshold comparison of multiple laser scanners, linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) and camera measurements. Data threshold exceedances enact maintenance actions automatically. However, issues such as measurement error, and sensor failure can result in false positives. Broad localisation resolution prevents trending/ inferencing by comparison with healthy data baseline at the same position over periodic inspections.

False alarms can result in costly ineffective interventions, are hazardous and impact the network availability.  

This paper proposes a novel methodology based on convolutional neural network (CNN) technique for detecting and classifying track geometry fault severity automatically. The proposed methodology comprises an automatic flow of data for quality assessment whereby outliers, missing values and misalignment are detected, restored and where appropriate curated. Improved, “clean” datasets were then analysed using a pretrained CNN model. The method was compared with a suite of machine learning algorithms for diagnosis including k-nearest neighbour, support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF).

The analysis results of a real track geometry dataset showed that track quality parameters including twist, cant, gauge, and alignment could be effectively diagnosed with an accuracy rate of 97.80% (CNN model). This result represents a remarkable improvement of 38% in comparison with the traditional threshold-based diagnosis. The benefits of this research are not only associated with maintenance intervention cost savings. It also helps prevent unnecessary train speed restrictions arising from misdiagnosis.

How to Cite

Durazo-Cardenas, I., Namoano, B. ., Starr, A., Dilip Sala, R. ., & Lai, J. . (2024). False alarm reduction in railway track quality inspections using machine learning. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4113
Abstract 221 | PDF Downloads 143

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Railways, false alarms, track quality, inspections, machine learning

References
Aydin, I., Akin, E., & Karakose, M. (2021). Defect classification based on deep features for railway tracks in sustainable transportation. Applied Soft Computing, 111, 107706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107706 D’Angelo, G., Bressi, S., Giunta, M., Lo Presti, D., & Thom, N. (2018). Novel performance-based technique for predicting maintenance strategy of bitumen stabilised ballast. Construction and Building Materials, 161, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.115 Durazo-Cardenas, I., Starr, A., Turner, C. J., Tiwari, A., Kirkwood, L., Bevilacqua, M., Tsourdos, A., Shehab, & Emmanouilidis, C. (2018). An autonomous system for maintenance scheduling data-rich complex infrastructure: Fusing the railways’ condition, planning and cost. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 89, 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.010 Ghofrani, F., He, Q., Goverde, R. M. P., & Liu, X. (2018).

Recent applications of big data analytics in railway transportation systems: A survey ☆. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.010 Lasisi, A., & Attoh-Okine, N. (2018). Principal components analysis and track quality index: A machine learning approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.001 New Measurement Train (NMT). (2024).

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-therailway/looking-after-the-railway/our-fleet-machinesand-vehicles/new-measurement-train-nmt/ NR/L2/TRK/001/MOD11. (2015). Inspection & Maintenance of Permanent Way: Track Geometry Inspections and Minimum Actions. Network Rail. Popov, K., De Bold, R., Chai, H. K., Forde, M. C., Ho, C. L., Hyslip, J. P., & Hsu, S. (2022). Big-data driven assessment of railway track and maintenance efficiency using Artificial Neural Networks. Construction and Building Materials, 349, 128786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128 786 Railtrack PLC. (1998). Section 8: Track Geometry. In Track Standards Manual.

Sasidharan, M., Burrow, M. P. N., & Ghataora, G. S. (2020).A whole life cycle approach under uncertainty for economically justifiable ballasted railway maintenance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100815 Sresakoolchai, J., & Kaewunruen, S. (2022). Railway defect detection based on track geometry using supervised and unsupervised machine learning. Structural Health Monitoring, 21(4), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217211044492 Tsunashima, H. (2019). Condition monitoring of railway tracks from car-body vibration using a machine learning technique. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(13), 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9132734.
Wang, Y., Correia, G. H. de A., van Arem, B., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (Harry). (2018). Understanding travellers’ preferences for different types of trip destination based on mobile internet usage data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 90, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2018.03.009
Section
Technical Papers