Feature Selection Method for Gear Health Indicator Using MIC Ranking

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Hongliang Song Hongli Gao Ruiyang Zhou Jianing He Mengfan Chen

Abstract

In the construction of health indicator for electromechanical equipment, selecting features that exhibit monotonicity, trend characteristics, and a strong correlation with equipment health is paramount to accurately reflect these indices. With the advent of numerous libraries and models for time-series data feature extraction, the range of potential features has expanded significantly. Despite this proliferation, there is a lack of extensive research on effective feature selection. This paper investigates the efficacy of the Maximum Information Coefficient (MIC) method in extracting features that align with the monotonicity and trend-related requirements of electromechanical equipment health indicator. Our experiments indicate that the MIC method adeptly identifies pertinent features for the construction of these indices, underlining its utility in the field of health monitoring for electromechanical systems.

How to Cite

Song, H., Gao, H., Zhou, R., He, J., & Chen, M. (2024). Feature Selection Method for Gear Health Indicator Using MIC Ranking. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4031
Abstract 9 | PDF Downloads 10

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Health Indicator, Feature Selection, Maximum Information Coefficient, Gearbox

References
[1] D. Wang, K.-L. Tsui, and Q. Miao, “Prognostics and Health Management: A Review of Vibration Based Bearing and Gear Health Indicators,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 665–676, 2018, doi:

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 351–365, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.024.

[4]

J. Li et al., “Feature Selection: A Data Perspective,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, no. 6, p. 94:1-94:45, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1145/3136625.

[5] V. Atamuradov, K. Medjaher, F. Camci, N. Zerhouni,

P. Dersin, and B. Lamoureux, “Machine Health Indicator Construction Framework for Failure Diagnostics and Prognostics,” J Sign Process Syst, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 591–609, Jun. 2020, doi:

10.1007/s11265-019-01491-4.

[6] Y. Sun, H. Gao, J. He, L. Guo, and H. Song, “A New Semi-Supervised Tool-Wear Monitoring Method Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labels.” Rochester, NY, Sep. 07, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4564476.

[7] Q. Hu, X.-S. Si, A.-S. Qin, Y.-R. Lv, and Q.-H. Zhang, “Machinery Fault Diagnosis Scheme Using Redefined Dimensionless Indicators and mRMR Feature Selection,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 40313–40326, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976832.

[8] A. Kumar et al., “A novel health indicator developed using filter-based feature selection algorithm for the identification of rotor defects,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, vol. 236, no. 4, pp. 529 –541, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1748006X20916953.

10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2774261.

[2] M. Barandas et al., “TSFEL: Time Series Feature Extraction Library,” SoftwareX, vol. 11, p. 100456, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100456.

[3] Y. Sun et al., “Transfer learning: A new aerodynamic force identification network based on adaptive EMD and soft thresholding in hypersonic wind tunnel,”

[9] A. Rai and J.-M. Kim, “A Novel Health Indicator Based on Information Theory Features for Assessing Rotating Machinery Performance Degradation,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 6982–6994, Sep. 2020, doi:10.1109/TIM.2020.2978966.

[10] W. Sui, D. Zhang, X. Qiu, W. Zhang, and L. Yuan, “Prediction of Bearing Remaining Useful Life based on Mutual Information and Support Vector Regression Model,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 533, no.1, p. 012032, May 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757 899X/533/1/012032.

[11] E. Zugasti, L. E. Mujica, J. Anduaga, and F. Martínez, “Feature Selection - Extraction Methods Based on PCA and Mutual Information to Improve Damage Detection Problem in Offshore Wind Turbines,” KEM, vol. 569–570, pp. 620–627, Jul. 2013, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.620.
Section
Posters