Bayesian Networks for Remaining Useful Life Prediction

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024

Abstract

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is a critical task in the field of condition-based maintenance. It is important to perform RUL prediction in a statistical sound way. However, it is not straightforward to properly combine multiple information sources about an asset, such as available statistics, measurements, derived features, and prior knowledge in the form of mathematical models and relations, including their uncertainties. Bayesian networks (BNs) are a means of graphically representing all statistical information in a comprehensible way and allow for correctly combining all information. BNs allow for inference in all directions, thereby not merely providing a RUL prediction with explicit uncertainty, but select the most informative features, diagnose which degradation mechanism is manifest if multiple mechanisms exist, provide decision support in the form of optimal condition-based maintenance points when combined with a cost model. BNs also explicitly quantify the model uncertainty arising from the scarcity of the training data. We illustrate these benefits on two realworld industrial examples: solenoids and bearings. We also provide a method to correctly include the effect of changing operating conditions.

How to Cite

Hostens, E., Eryilmaz, K., Vangilbergen, M., & Ooijevaar, T. (2024). Bayesian Networks for Remaining Useful Life Prediction. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4019
Abstract 339 | PDF Downloads 257

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Bayesian Networks, Remaining Useful Life, Prognostics, Uncertainty, Condition-Based Maintenance

References
Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (2006). Hierarchical bayes models. The handbook of marketing research: Uses, misuses, and future advances, 418–440.
Geurts, K., Eryilmaz, K., & Ooijevaar, T. (2023). A sequential hybrid method for full lifetime remaining useful life prediction of bearings in rotating machinery. In Annual conference of the phm society (Vol. 15).
ISO281. (2007). Rolling bearings-dynamic load ratings and rating life. ISO: International Organization for Standardization.
Jiang, R., & Murthy, D. (2011). A study of weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(12), 1619–1626.
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2011). The statistical analysis of failure time data. John Wiley & Sons.
Kucukelbir, A., Tran, D., Ranganath, R., Gelman, A., & Blei, D. M. (2017). Automatic differentiation variational inference. Journal of machine learning research, 18(14), 1–45.
Mazaev, G., Ompusunggu, A. P., Tod, G., Crevecoeur, G., & Van Hoecke, S. (2020). Data-driven prognostics of alternating current solenoid valves. In 2020 prognostics and health management conference (phm-besanc¸on) (pp. 109–115).
Mishra, M., Martinsson, J., Rantatalo, M., & Goebel, K. (2018). Bayesian hierarchical model-based prognostics for lithium-ion batteries. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 25–35.
Nowlan, F. S., & Heap, H. F. (1978). Reliability-centered maintenance.
NSWC. (2011). Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical equipment. Naval Surface Warfare Center West Bethesda, MD.
Ompusunggu, A. P., & Hostens, E. (2021). Physics-inspired feature engineering for condition monitoring of alternating current-powered solenoid-operated valves. In International conference on maintenance, condition monitoring and diagnostics (pp. 139–151).
Ompusunggu, A. P., & Hostens, E. (2023). Quantitative evaluation of electric features for health monitoring and assessment of ac-powered solenoid operated valves. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2), 3725–3731.
Ooijevaar, P. K., Ted and, Di, Y., et al. (2019). Smart machine maintenance enabled by a condition monitoring living lab. In 8th ifac symposium on mechatronic systems (mechatronics 2019) and the 11th ifac symposium on nonlinear control systems (nolcos 2019) (Vol. 52). Elsevier.
Patil, A., Huard, D., & Fonnesbeck, C. J. (2010). Pymc: Bayesian stochastic modelling in python. Journal of statistical software, 35(4), 1.
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan kaufmann.
Prakash, G., Narasimhan, S., & Pandey, M. D. (2019). A probabilistic approach to remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings. Structural health monitoring, 18(2), 466–485.
Quatrini, E., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., & Patriarca, R. (2020). Condition-based maintenance—an extensive literature review. Machines, 8(2), 31.
Sankararaman, S. (2015). Significance, interpretation, and quantification of uncertainty in prognostics and remaining useful life prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 52-53, 228-247.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of Prognostics and health management, 1(1), 4–23.
Tod, G., Mazaev, G., Eryilmaz, K., Ompusunggu, A. P., Hostens, E., & Van Hoecke, S. (2019). A convolutional neural network aided physical model improvement for ac solenoid valves diagnosis. In 2019 prognostics and system health management conference (phm-paris) (pp. 223–227).
Section
Technical Papers