LSTM and Transformers based methods for Remaining Useful Life Prediction considering Censored Data

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Jean-Pierre NOOT Etienne BIRMELE François REY

Abstract

Predictive maintenance deals with the timely replacement of industrial components relatively to their failure. It allows to prevent shutdowns as in reactive maintenance and reduces the costs compared to preventive maintenance. As a consequence, Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction of industrial components has become a key challenge for condition based monitoring. In many applications, in particular those for which preventive maintenance is the general rule, the prediction problem ismade harder by the rarity of failing instances. Indeed, the interruption of data acquisition before the occurrence of the event of interest leads to right censored data.

There are few articles in the literature that take that phenomenon into account for RUL prediction, even though it is common in the industrial environment to have a high rate of censored data. The present article proposes a deep-learning approach based on multi-sensor time series which allows to consider censored data during the training of the neural networks. Two methods are proposed, respectively based on the Dual Aspect Self Attention based on Transformer proposed by (Z. Zhang, Song, & Li, 2022) for non-censored data and on a recurrent neural network. Their evaluation on the C-MAPSS benchmark dataset shows, compared to the state-of-the-art RUL prediction methods, no loss in the absence of censoring, and outperformance on censored data.

How to Cite

NOOT, J.-P., BIRMELE, E., & REY, F. (2024). LSTM and Transformers based methods for Remaining Useful Life Prediction considering Censored Data. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.3974
Abstract 361 | PDF Downloads 202

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

LSTM, Transformers, RUL prediciton, Deep Learning, Predictive Maintenance, Censored Data

References
Arena, F., Collotta, M., Luca, L., Ruggieri, M., & Termine, F. G. (2021). Predictive maintenance in the automotive sector: A literature review. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 27(1), 2.
Boutrous, K., Bessa, I., Puig, V., Nejjari, F., & Palhares, R.M. (2022). Data-driven prognostics based on evolving fuzzy degradation models for power semiconductor devices. In Phm society european conference (Vol. 7, pp. 68–77).
Chaoub, A., Voisin, A., Cerisara, C., & Iung, B. (2021). Learning representations with end-to-end models for improved remaining useful life prognostics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05049.
Chen, C., Liu, Y.,Wang, S., Sun, X., Di Cairano-Gilfedder, C., Titmus, S., & Syntetos, A. A. (2020). Predictivemaintenance using cox proportional hazard deep learning.
Advanced Engineering Informatics, 44, 101054.
Garay, J. M., & Diedrich, C. (2019). Analysis of the applicability of fault detection and failure prediction based on unsupervised learning andmonte carlo simulations
for real devices in the industrial automobile production. In 2019 ieee 17th international conference on industrial informatics (indin) (Vol. 1, pp. 1279–1284).
Heimes, F. O. (2008). Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation. In 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management (pp. 1–6).
Jeong, K., & Choi, S. (2019). Model-based sensor fault diagnosis of vehicle suspensions with a support vector machine. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 20, 961–970.
Kong, Y., Abdullah, S., Schramm, D., Omar, M., & Haris, S. (2019). Development of multiple linear regressionbased models for fatigue life evaluation of automotive coil springs. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 118, 675–695.
Lai, Z., Liu,M., Pan, Y., & Chen, D. (2022). Multi-dimensional self attention based approach for remaining useful life estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05772.
Li, H., Zhao,W., Zhang, Y., & Zio, E. (2020). Remaining useful life prediction usingmulti-scale deep convolutional neural network. Applied Soft Computing, 89, 106113.
Li, X., Ding, Q., & Sun, J.-Q. (2018). Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 1–11.
Patil, S., Patil, A., Handikherkar, V., Desai, S., Phalle, V.M., & Kazi, F. S. (2018). Remaining useful life (rul) prediction of rolling element bearing using random forest and gradient boosting technique. In Asme international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (Vol. 52187, p. V013T05A019).
Sateesh Babu, G., Zhao, P., & Li, X.-L. (2016). Deep convolutional neural network based regression approach for estimation of remaining useful life. In Database
systems for advanced applications: 21st international conference, dasfaa 2016, dallas, tx, usa, april 16-19, 2016, proceedings, part i 21 (pp. 214–228).
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-tofailure simulation. In 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management (pp. 1–9).
Song, Y., Gao, S., Li, Y., Jia, L., Li, Q., & Pang, F. (2020). Distributed attention-based temporal convolutional network for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(12), 9594–9602.
Tinga, T., & Loendersloot, R. (2019). Physical model-based prognostics and healthmonitoring to enable predictive maintenance. PredictiveMaintenance in Dynamic Systems: Advanced Methods, Decision Support Tools and Real-World Applications, 313–353.
Vasavi, S., Aswarth, K., Pavan, T. S.D., & Gokhale, A. A. (2021). Predictive analytics as a service for vehicle healthmonitoring using edge computing and ak-nn algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 8645–8654.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., . . . Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
Vishnu, T., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., & Shroff, G. (2019). Datadriven prognostics with predictive uncertainty estimation using ensemble of deep ordinal regressionmodels. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 10(4).
Yang, Z., Kanniainen, J., Krogerus, T., & Emmert-Streib, F. (2022). Prognostic modeling of predictive maintenance with survival analysis for mobile work equipment. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 8529. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10 .1038/s41598-022-12572-z doi: 10.1038/ s41598-022-12572-z
Zhang, C., Lim, P., Qin, A. K., & Tan, K. C. (2016). Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 28(10), 2306–2318.
Zhang, Z., Song, W., & Li, Q. (2022). Dual aspect selfattention based on transformer for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71, 1–11.
Zhao, C., Huang, X., Li, Y., & Yousaf Iqbal, M. (2020). A double-channel hybrid deep neural network based on cnn and bilstm for remaining useful life prediction. Sensors, 20(24), 7109.
Zhao, Y., Liu, P.,Wang, Z., & Hong, J. (2017). Electric vehicle battery fault diagnosis based on statistical method. Energy Procedia, 105, 2366–2371.
Zheng, S., Ristovski, K., Farahat, A., & Gupta, C. (2017). Long short-termmemory network for remaining useful life estimation. In 2017 ieee international conference on prognostics and health management (icphm) (pp. 88–95).
Section
Technical Papers