Optimal Service Points (OSP) for PHM Enabled Condition Based Maintenance for Oil and Gas Applications



Published Jun 29, 2021
Atuahene Barimah Octavian Niculita Don McGlinchey Babakalli Alkali


In recent times, the oil and Gas industry has faced many challenges resulting from a tightening climate policy environment on oil and gas exploration, as well as the increasing risk of oversupply due to new discoveries globally. This has given stakeholders in the industry an incentive to integrate new technologies to optimize the operational efficiency of their assets, leading to the optimal recovery of hydrocarbons especially in marginal fields.  Various Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) now provide different service offerings using data driven methods to provide condition monitoring of assets for oil and gas operators. However, a significant part of the value proposition by OEMs in their service delivery focuses on value generated at the component level with a reduction in asset downtime. This limits the broad economic benefits that a condition-based approach can provide, at the enterprise level.  

Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop a cost benefit analysis framework for assessing the implementation of condition and performance monitoring of oil and gas assets used in surface applications. The framework utilizes a combined technical-economic approach to determine a minimum predictive requirement for the implementation of condition-based principles to maintenance of assets in a hydrocarbon project from first oil to abandonment. This financial analysis framework uses a condition monitoring approach based on prognostics as well as a regression approach for fault detection and system performance. The paper will present a case study to evaluate the costs and benefits associated with implementing a condition-based maintenance approach for a set of valves in a Christmas tree subsystem, as part of a typical onshore production system.  

The framework illustrated using the case study compares a constant failure rate Time-Based approach to the PHM enabled condition-based maintenance. The results demonstrate that a prognostic enabled system can provide commercial benefits at the component level for a Condition Based Maintenance strategy but not necessarily at the enterprise level for an oil and gas project. The cumulative reduction in downtime at the component level over a project lifecycle offsetting the present value of the total cost of integrating a PHM enabled system into the overall maintenance strategy creates the ideal situation for commercial viability.  

However, the commercial viability of the PHM integration would depend on the accuracy of predicting failure events and monitoring asset degradation by the PHM enabled system which ultimately defines the performance of the condition-based maintenance approach. The accuracy level of asset failure therefore  provides OEMs with a benchmark for executing their condition-based maintenance services with a minimum performance threshold.  

Secondly, an enterprise level financial viability, as well as OEM profitability in the implementation of a condition-based maintenance approach, requires an Optimal Service Point (OSP) which is a function of the minimum predictive requirement of the PHM system. The utility that the OSP provides is that, it gives the minimum value of the framework’s decision criteria that an operator can use a basis for incorporating a condition-based approach in its maintenance strategy. It also provides the maximum Annual Service Fee (ASF) derived from the cumulative OEM NPV needed for structuring and pricing servitization agreements with operators.  

This OSP cost benefit analysis approach ultimately provides OEMs and operators with a practical guide in the provision as well as the adoption of condition-based maintenance strategies respectively. It balances the risk of PHM integration by operators with a minimum PHM system performance threshold required for commercial viability for project lifecycle.  

How to Cite

Barimah, A. ., Niculita, O. ., McGlinchey, D. ., & Alkali, B. . (2021). Optimal Service Points (OSP) for PHM Enabled Condition Based Maintenance for Oil and Gas Applications . PHM Society European Conference, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2021.v6i1.2850
Abstract 1098 | PDF Downloads 381



Optimal Service Point (OSP), Condition Based Maintenance, Annual Service Fee (ASF), Minimum Predictive Requirement

AHMAD, R. & KAMARUDDIN, S., (2012). An overview of time-based and condition-based
maintenance in industrial application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 18 February , 63(1),
pp. 135-149.

ANIMAH, I. & SHAFIEE, M., (2018). Condition assessment, remaining useful life prediction
and life extension decision making for offshore oil and gas assets. Journal of loss prevention in
the process Industries, Volume 53, pp. 17-28.

ANOWU, K.R., (2019). Characterisation Of the Degradation Phenomenon of Surface Wellheads
Christmas Tree Control Valves. Masters Thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University.

BAINES, T. S., LIGHTFOOT, H., EVANS, S., NEELY, A., GREENOUGH, R., et al., (2007).
State-of-the-art in product service systems. Journal of Engineering Manufacture. Cranfield, UK.
DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM858

BAVEJA S.S., GILBERT J., LEDINGHAM D., (2004). From products to services: why it's not
so simple, Harvard Management Update, 9 (4), pp. 3-5

BOADMAN, A., GREENBERG, D., VINING, A., & WEIMER, D., (2018). Cost Benefit
Analysis: Concepts and Practice., 4th edition, Cambridge University Press, DOI:

BEDFORD, T & COOKE, R. (2001). “Frontmatter,” Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and
Methods., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-4. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511813597.

CAVALIERI, S. & PEZZOTTA, G., (2012). Product–Service Systems Engineering: State of the
art and research challenges. Computers in Industry, February, Volume 63, p. 278–288.

COMPARE, M., BELLANI, L. & ZIO, E., 2017. Reliability model of a component equipped
with PHM capabilities. Reliability Engineering and System safety, Volume 168, pp. 4-11.

DESJARDINS, G., (2002) Improved data quality opens way for predicting corrosion growth and
severity, Pipeline & Gas Journal (December 2002), pp. 28-32

ENGEL, S., GILMARTIN, B., BONGORT, K. & HESS, A., March 2000. Prognostics, the Real
Issues Involved with Predicting Life Remaining. Big Sky, MT, Proceedings of the IEEE
Aerospace Conference, pp. pp. 457-469.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2014. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects,

FATIH CAMCI, G., VALENTINE, S. & NAVARRA, K., 2007. Methodologies for Integration
of PHM Systems with Maintenance Data. IEEE.

FELDMAN, K., JAZOULI & SANDBORN, P., 2009. A Methodology for Determining the
Return on Investment Associated With Prognostics and Health Management. IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, June, 58(2), pp. 305-316.

FELDMAN, K., SANDBORN, P., & JAZOULI, T. (2008). The Analysis of Return on
Investment for PHM Applied to Electronic Systems. Prognostics and Health Management,
Denver, USA. doi: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711415

FRENCH, N., & GABRIELLI, L, Discounted Cashflow: Accounting for Uncertainty, JPIF, vol.
23(1), (2005).

GAO, X., NICULITA, O., BALKALI, B. & MCGLINCHEY, D., 2018. Cost benefit analysis of
applying PHM for Subsea Applications. s.l., EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF THE

GE Oil & Gas, 2016. The Impact of Digital on Unplanned Downtime - An Offshore Oil and Gas
Perspective [viewed 10 August 2020]. Available

GEBAUER, H. FLEISCH, E., FRIEDLI, T., Overcoming the Service Paradox in Manufacturing
Companies, European Management Journal, 23 (1) (2005), pp. 14-26, 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.006

strategies in product manufacturing companies. Business Strategy Series. 1. 21-29.

GHOSH, D. & ROY, S., 2009. Maintenance optimization using probabilistic cost-benefit
analysis. Journal of loss prevention in the process industry, Volume 11, pp. 403-407.

GHOSH, D. & ROY, S., (2009). Maintenance optimization using probabilistic cost-benefit
analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, January , Volume 22, p. 403–407.

GOLDSMITH, R., & ERICSON, R. (2000). Lifetime Cost of Subsea Production Systems (JIP),
DNV. Norway.

GRUBIC, T., JENNIONS I., & BAINES T. (2009). The Interaction of PSS and PHM- a mutual
benefit case, Prognostics and Health Management Society, San Diego, California USA.

GUILLEN, A., CRESPO, A., MACCHI, M. & GOMEZ, J., 2016. On the role of Prognostics and
Health Management in advanced maintenance systems. Production Planning & Control, 27(12),
pp. 991-1004.

HADDAD, G., SANDBORN, P. & PECHT, M., DECEMBER 2012. An Options Approach for
Decision Support of Systems With Prognostic Capabilities. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON

HÖLZEL, N. & GOLLNICK, V., 2015. ''Cost-benefit Analysis of Prognostics and Conditionbased Maintenance Concepts for Commercial Aircraft Considering Prognostic Errors''. ANNUAL

JARDINE, A., LIN, D. & BANJEVIC, D., 2006. ''A review on machinery diagnostics and
prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance.'' Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing, 20(7), pp. 1483-1510

KACPRZYNSKI, G. J, ROEMER, M. J. & HESS, A “Health management system design:
Development, simulation and cost/benefit optimization,” IEEE Aerospace Conference
Proceedings, Vol. 6, Page(s):6-3065 - 6-3072. Mar. 2002.

KLUTKE, G.A., KIESSLER, P.C. & WORTMAN, M.A, (2003). A critical look at the bathtub
curve", Reliability. IEEE Transactions on, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 125-129.

LEAO, B. P., FITZGIBBON, K. T., PUTTINI, L. C., & MELO, G. P. B. DE (2008). Costbenefit analysis methodology for PHM applied to legacy commercial aircraft. Proceedings of
IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 1- 8, Big Sky, MT. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2008.4526599

LEE J., NI DJURDJANOVIC D., QIU H., LIAO H., Intelligent prognostics tools and emaintenance, Computers in Industry, 57 (6) (2006), pp. 476-489

LUNA, J., 2009. Metrics, Models, and Scenarios for Evaluating PHM Effects on Logistics
Support. Beverly, Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.

MITCHELL, J., MARCEL, V. & MITCHELL, B., 2015. Oil and Gas Mismatches: Finance,
Investment and Climate Policy, s.l.: Chatham House.

MOIR, K, NICULITA, O & MILLIGAN, W 2018, Prognostics and health management in the oil
& gas industry – a step change. in Proceedings of the European Conference of the PHM Society.
vol. 4 (1).

MONDORO, A., FRANGOPOL, D.M & LIU, L. Multi-criteria robust optimization framework
for bridge adaptation under climate change, Struct. Saf., 74 (2018), pp. 14-23,

NEELY, A.D. (2009) “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of
Manufacturing”, Operations Management Research, 2(1), pp. 103-118

PADGETT, J., DENNEMANN, K., & GHOSH, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost–
benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety. 32. 165-173.

PECHT, M., 2008. Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics. New York, NY, USA,

PECHT, M., (2010). A Prognostics and Health Management Roadmap for Information and
Electronics-Rich Systems. IEICE ESS Fundamentals Review, 3(4), pp. 425-432.

REIM, W., PARIDA, V. & ORTQVIST, D., (2015). ProducteService Systems (PSS) business
models and tactics e a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 97,
pp. 61-75.

SANDBORN, P. A., & WILKINSON, C. (2007). A maintenance planning and business case
development model for the application of prognostics and health management (PHM) to
electronic systems. Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1889-1901.

SUN, B., ZENG, S., KANG, R. & PECHT, M., 2010. Benefits Analysis of Prognostics in
Systems. Macau, Prognostics & System Health Management Conference.

TAHAN, M., TSOUTSANIS, E. & MASDI, M., 2017. Performance-based health monitoring,
diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines: A review. Applied
Energy , Volume 198, p. 122–144.

TAHAN, M., TSOUTSANIS, E., MASDI, M. & ABDUL KARIM, Z., 2017. Performance-based
health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance of gas turbines:
A review. Applied Energy, 15 April, Volume 198, pp. 122-144.

TIDDENS, W. W. (2018). Setting sail towards predictive maintenance: developing tools to
conquer difficulties in the implementation of maintenance analytics. Enschede: University of
Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036546034

Available at: https://www.total.com/infographics/evolution-global-energy-mix-through-2035
[Accessed 12 July 2020].

TUV NEL Ltd., 2003. Health and Safety Executive. [Online] Available at:
https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr162.htm [Accessed 11 August 2020].

VAN DER POL, T.D., VAN IERLAND, E.C., & GABBERT, S., Economic analysis of adaptive
strategies for flood risk management under climate change Mitigation Adaptation Strategies
Global Change, 22 (2) (2017), pp. 267-285, 10.1007/s11027-015-9637-0

VASQUEZ, K.R., (2008). Effect of Availability on Multi-Period Planning of Subsea Oil and Gas
Production Systems [online]. Masters Thesis, Texas A&M University. [viewed 20TH July 2020].
Available from: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2905

VINTR, Z & HOLUB, R. (2003), Preventive maintenance optimization on the basis of operating
data analysis, Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (2003)

WANG, W. & PECHT, M., 2011. Economic Analysis of Canary-Based Prognostics and Health

XU, P., WANG, Z. & LI, Y., 2010. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) System
Requirements and Validation. Macau, s.n.

YANG, M. & BLYTH, W., 2007. Modeling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real
Options. [Online] Available at: http://www.iea.org/w/bookshop/add.aspx?id=305 [Accessed 14
July 2020].

ZIO, E., 2016. Some Challenges and Opportunities in Reliability Engineering. IEEE
Technical Papers