Potential of Generative AI in Knowledge-Based Predictive Maintenance for Aircraft Engines

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2025
Meriem Hafsi

Abstract

In recent decades, predictive maintenance has become a strategic solution to detect anomalies and anticipate failures in industrial equipment and sophisticated machines. This strategy relies on the continuous collection of multi-sensor data and performance indicators to feed machine learning algorithms capable of identifying early signs of malfunction, thereby enabling preventive interventions and reducing downtime. In the literature, three main approaches are described: physics-based, data-driven, and knowledge-based. Physics-based methods require accurate mathematical modeling of the physical degradation processes involved, but they are often difficult to apply to complex systems where physical laws are hard to formalize. Data-driven methods dominate current implementations due to their ability to learn complex patterns from large datasets. However, they suffer from several limitations, such as a lack of interpretability, dependence on large amounts of labeled data, and poor generalization to new operating conditions. Knowledge-based approaches, on the other hand, are more explainable and rely on expert-defined rules, but they struggle with adaptability and scalability in dynamic or uncertain environments.

This study investigates the potential of generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI) to address these limitations by supporting the creation of hybrid predictive maintenance models that combine the strengths of both data-driven and knowledge-based approaches. Generative AI offers new capabilities to simulate realistic failure scenarios, augment limited datasets, and extract structured knowledge from unstructured technical sources. It can also support the construction of domain-specific knowledge graphs or ontologies by identifying relevant concepts and semantic relationships, as well as generate logical reasoning rules based on expert input or technical documentation. Additionally, Generative AI shows promising potential in assisting the physical modeling of complex systems by proposing plausible approximations or surrogate models when traditional analytical modeling proves difficult. To support this investigation, the study will address a use case focused on Remaining Useful Life estimation for aircraft engines using the C-MAPSS benchmark dataset.

How to Cite

Hafsi, M. (2025). Potential of Generative AI in Knowledge-Based Predictive Maintenance for Aircraft Engines. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2025.v17i1.4352
Abstract 1 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Generative AI, Knowledge-Based Approach, Predictive Maintenance, Remaining Useful Life, Industry 4.0, Ontology

References
Baptista, M., & Henriques, E. (2022). 1d-dgan-phm: A 1-d denoising gan for prognostics and health management with an application to turbofan. Applied Soft Computing, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109785
Barry, I., & Hafsi, M. (2023). Towards hybrid predictive maintenance for aircraft engine: Embracing an ontological-data approach. In 2023 20th acs/ieee international conference on computer systems and applications (aiccsa) (p. 1-6). doi: 10.1109/AICCSA59173.2023.10479328
Benatia, M., Hafsi, M., & Ayed, S. B. (2025). A continual learning approach for failure prediction under non-stationary conditions: Application to condition monitoring data streams. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 204, 111049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111049
Campbell, N., Ilangovan, H., Gregory, I., & Mikaelian, S. (2022, 01). Data augmentation for intelligent contingency management using generative adversarial networks. In Aiaa scitech 2022 forum. doi: 10.2514/6.2022-0622
Cao, Q., Zanni-Merk, C., Samet, A., De Beuvron, F. D. B., & Reich, C. (2020). Using rule quality measures for rule base refinement in knowledge-based predictive maintenance systems. Cybernetics and Systems, 51(2), 161–176.
Cao, Q., Zanni-Merk, C., Samet, A., Reich, C., De Beuvron, F. D. B., Beckmann, A., & Giannetti, C. (2022). Kspmi: a knowledge-based system for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 74, 102281.
Davari, N., Veloso, B., Costa, G. d. A., Pereira, P. M., Ribeiro, R. P., & Gama, J. (2021). A survey on datadriven predictive maintenance for the railway industry. Sensors, 21(17), 5739.
de Pater, I., Reijns, A., & Mitici, M. (2022). Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect remaining useful life prognostics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 221, 108341.
Eker, O. F., Camci, F., & Jennions, I. K. (2019). A new hybrid prognostic methodology. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 10(2).
Hafsi, M. (2024, July). Exploring a Knowledge-Based Approach for Predictive Maintenance of Aircraft Engines: Studying Fault Propagation through Spatial and Topological Component Relationships. In 8th european conference of the prognostics and health management society 2024 (p. 9). Czech Republic. doi: 10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4100
Hagmeyer, S., Zeiler, P., & Huber, M. F. (2022). On the integration of fundamental knowledge about degradation processes into data-driven diagnostics and prognostics using theory-guided data science. In Phm society european conference (Vol. 7, pp. 156–165).
Huang, M., Sheng, C., & Rao, X. (2025). Conditional variational autoencoder and generative adversarial networkbased approach for long-tailed fault diagnosis for the motor system. Measurement, 242, 116116.
Huang, W., Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Shao, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025,01). Mcba-mvacgan: A novel fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery under small sample conditions. Machines, 13, 71. doi: 10.3390/machines13010071
Isik, B. (2023). Knowledge-based maintenance management system of compressed air system. In International symposium on industrial engineering and automation (pp.197–208).
Khan, Z. U., Nasim, B.,&Rasheed, Z. (2025, 10). Generative ai based predictive maintenance in aviation: A systematic literature review. CEAS Aeronautical Journal. doi: 10.1007/s13272-025-00818-1
Klekowicki, M., Szyma´nski, G., Walig´orski, M., & Misztal, W. (2024, 11). Application of large language models in diagnostics and maintenance of aircraft propulsion systems. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 19, 304-320. doi: 10.12913/22998624/196264
Konig, T., Wagner, F., Liebschner, M., & Kley, M. (2025). Generative adversarial networks in fault diagnosis and an implementation approach: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2025.3575284
Lang, P., Peng, K., Cui, J., Yang, J., & Guo, Y. (2021). Data augmentation for fault prediction of aircraft engine with generative adversarial networks. In 2021 caa symposium on fault detection, supervision, and safety for technical processes (safeprocess) (p. 1-5). doi: 10.1109/SAFEPROCESS52771.2021.9693711
Li, X. Y., Cheng, D. J., Fang, X. F., Zhang, C. Y., & Wang, Y. F. (2024). A novel data augmentation strategy for aeroengine multitask prognosis based on degradation behavior extrapolation and diversity-usability trade-off. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110238
Li, Z., Jiang, H., & Wang, X. (2025). A novel reinforcement learning agent for rotating machinery fault diagnosis with data augmentation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 253, 110570.
Mohapatra, A. (2024, 11). Generative ai for predictive maintenance: Predicting equipment failures and optimizing maintenance schedules using ai. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12, 1648-1672.
Nunes, P., Santos, J., & Rocha, E. (2023). Challenges in predictive maintenance–a review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 40, 53–67.
Palma, G., Cecchi, G., & Rizzo, A. (2025). Large language models for predictive maintenance in the leather tanning industry: Multimodal anomaly detection in compressors. Electronics, 14(10).
Prabha, K., Nataraj, B., Sathish, S., Sujith, C., & Suthakarr, G. (2025, 05). Predictive maintenance for industrial machinery using llm. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH), 3, 2063-2069. doi: 10.47392/IRJAEH.2025.0301
Rosati, R., Romeo, L., Cecchini, G., Tonetto, F., Viti, P., Mancini, A., & Frontoni, E. (2023). From knowledge based to big data analytic model: a novel iot and machine learning based decision support system for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34(1), 107–121.
Santiago, R. A., Barbosa, N. B., Mergulh˜ao, H. G., Carvalho, T., Santos, A. B., Medrado, R. C., . . . Nascimento, E. G. S. (2024). Data-driven models applied to predictive and prescriptive maintenance of wind turbine:
A systematic review of approaches based on failure detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Energies, 17(5).
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In 2008 international conference on prognostics and health management (p. 1-9). doi: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414
Sikorska, J. Z., Hodkiewicz, M., & Ma, L. (2011). Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 25(5), 1803–1836.
Stanton, I., Munir, K., Ikram, A., & El-Bakry, M. (2024). Data augmentation for predictive maintenance: Synthesising aircraft landing gear datasets. Engineering Reports, 6(12), e12946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12946
Toro, S., Anagnostopoulos, A., Bello, S., Blumberg, K., Cameron, R., Carmody, L., Mungall, C. (2024). Dynamic retrieval augmented generation of ontologies using artificial intelligence (dragon-ai). Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 15.
Traini, E., Bruno, G., & Lombardi, F. (2021). Design of a physics-based and data-driven hybrid model for predictive maintenance. In Advances in production management systems. artificial intelligence for sustainable and resilient production systems: Ifip wg 5.7 international conference, apms 2021, nantes, france (pp. 536–543).
Wen, L., Su, S., Li, X., Ding, W., & Feng, K. (2024). Gru-ae-wiener: A generative adversarial network assisted hybrid gated recurrent unit with wiener model for bearing remaining useful life estimation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 220, 111663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111663
Westerinen, A., & Bennett, M. (2023, 10). Ontologies and large language models related but different.. Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and health management (phm): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108119
Section
Industry Experience Papers