A Framework for Rapid Prototyping of PHM Analytics for Complex Systems using a Supervised Data-Driven Approach

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2023
Katarina Vuckovic Shashvat Prakash Ben Burke

Abstract

Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) solutions are becoming increasingly popular in industries that rely on large
systems such as aircraft, spacecraft, and power plants. PHM analytic solutions are designed to monitor the health of each
subsystem and component and apply predictive analytic to improve system reliability and safety, reduce the cost and decrease time spent on unscheduled maintenance. However, identifying correlations between different components and
associated monitors in these large systems can be challenging. To address this issue and achieve maximum utilization of available monitoring signals, a methodology is required that can identify correlations between degraded or failed components and the features engineered from the monitors and sensors. This paper introduces a framework that enables rapid prototyping of analytics, allowing users to seamlessly move from designing and discovering features to developing models for a specific event or component of interest. The framework has three main components: feature exploration, data
preparation, and model development. Feature exploration focuses on feature engineering using raw monitor data from all available monitors. Data preparation purges the data, and down-selects relevant features based on correlation defined in the feature exploration part. The data preparation step also creates a training dataset. Model development enables
quick testing and comparison of multiple supervised Machine Learning (ML) models. To demonstrate the framework, this paper presents an example of a remaining useful life model for an aircraft component. While the examples and simulations are aircraft-focused, the principles behind the framework can be applied to other large systems.

How to Cite

Vuckovic, K., Prakash, S., & Burke, B. (2023). A Framework for Rapid Prototyping of PHM Analytics for Complex Systems using a Supervised Data-Driven Approach. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2023.v15i1.3480
Abstract 1453 | Slides (PDF) Downloads 235 Paper (PDF) Downloads 1309

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

ML, RUL

References
Aronchick, D., & Boykis, V. (2020). Mlops: ContinuousO’Reilly Media.

Fei, X., Bin, C., Jun, C., & Shunhua, H. (2020). Literature review: Framework of prognostic health management forairline predictive maintenance. In 2020 chinese controland decision conference (ccdc) (p. 5112-5117). doi: 10.1109/CCDC49329.2020.9164546

Hamadache, M., Jung, J. H., Park, J., & Youn, B. D. (2019). A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence-based approaches for rolling element bearing phm: shallow and deep learning. JMST Advances, 1, 125–151.

Hsu, T.-H., Chang, Y.-J., Hsu, H.-K., Chen, T.-T., & Hwang, P.-W. (2022). Predicting the remaining useful life of landing gear with prognostics and health management (phm). Aerospace, 9(8), 462.

International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board, Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM) Integration in MSG 3 (Tech. Rep.). (2018). Issue Paper 180,Air Transport Association of America. Retrieved from
https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/imrbpb-issue-papers

Khan, K., Sohaib, M., Rashid, A., Ali, S., Akbar, H., Basit, A., & Ahmad, T. (2021). Recent trends and challenges in predictive maintenance of aircraft’s engine and hydraulic system. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43, 1–17.

Kim, S., Choi, J.-H., & Kim, N. H. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of system-level prognostics. Sensors, 21(22), 7655.
Lang, B., Zhao, H., Mi, C., Huang, Q., Song, L., & Ma, G. (2021). Application and analysis of prognostics and health management technology in weapon equipment.

In 2021 3rd international conference on system reliability and safety engineering (srse) (p. 56-59). doi: 10.1109/SRSE54209.2021.00016

Liu, J., & Chen, Z. (2019). Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on health indicator and gaussian process regression model. IEEE Access, 7, 39474-39484. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905740

Meng, H., & Li, Y.-F. (2019). A review on prognostics and health management (phm) methods of lithium-ion batteries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,116, 109405.

Prakash, S., Vuckovic, K., & Amin, S. (2023). Prognostic model evaluation metrics. In 2023 ieee aerospace conference (p. 1-11). doi:
10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115952

Tao, F., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Nee, A. Y. (2018). Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment. Cirp Annals, 67(1), 169–172.

Vuckovic, K., & Prakash, S. (2022). Remaining useful life prediction using gaussian process regression model. In Annual conference of the phm society (Vol. 14).

Zhao, X., Kim, J., Warns, K., Wang, X., Ramuhalli, P., Cetiner, S., Golay, M. (2021). Prognostics and health management in nuclear power plants: An updated method-centric review with special focus on data-driven methods. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 696785
Section
Industry Experience Papers