Sensor Selection with Grey Correlation Analysis for Remaining Useful Life Evaluation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Peng Yu Xu Yong Liu Datong Peng Xiyuan

Abstract

Sensor selection in data modeling is an important research topic for prognostics. The performance of prediction model may vary considerably under different variable subset. Hence it is of great important to devise a systematic sensor selection method that offers guidance on choosing the most representative sensors for prognostics. This paper proposes a sensor selection method based on the improved grey correlation analysis. From empirical observation, all the continuous-value sensors with a consistent monotonic trend are firstly selected for data fusion, and a linear regression model is used to convert the multi-dimensional sensor readings into one-dimensional health factor (HF). The correlation between HF and each of the selected sensors is evaluated by calculating the grey correlation degree defined on two time series. The optimal sensor subset with a relatively large correlation degree is selected to execute the final fusion. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified experimentally on the turbofan engine simulation data supplied by NASA Ames, using instance-based learning methodology, and the experimental results showed that RUL prediction with fewer sensor inputs can obtain a more accurate prognostics performance than using all sensors initially considered relevant.

How to Cite

Yu, P. ., Yong, X. ., Datong, L. ., & Xiyuan, P. . (2012). Sensor Selection with Grey Correlation Analysis for Remaining Useful Life Evaluation. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2012.v4i1.2171
Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 28

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

sensor selection, grey correlation analysis, residual useful life prediction, similarity measures

References
Heng, A., Zhang, S., Tan, C. T., & Mathew, J. (2008). Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol 23, pp. 724-739. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.06.009

Cheng, S., Azarian, M. H., & Pecht, M. G. (2010). Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors, vol 10, pp 5774-5797,doi:10.3390/s100605774

Coble, J. B., (2010). Merging Data Sources to Predict Remaining Useful Life – An Automated Methods to Identify Prognostic Parameters, Doctoral dissertation.University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddis/683

Zhang, G. F., (2005). Optimal Sensor Localization/Selection in A Diagnostic/Prognostic Architecture, Doctoral dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
USA.

Xue, F., Bonissone, P., Varma, A., Yan, W. Z., & Goebel, K. (2008). An Instance-based method for remaining useful life estimation for aircraft engines. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol 8, pp. 199-206. doi:10.1007/s11668-008-9118-9

Wang, T. Y., Yu, J. B., Siegel, D., & Lee, J. (2008). A similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems. International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. October 6-9, Denver, CO. doi:10.1109/PHM.2008.4711421

Zhang, Y. J., & Zhang, X. (2007). Grey correlation analysis between strength of slag cement and particle fractions of slag powder. Cement and Concrete Composites, vol 29, pp. 498-504. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.02.004

Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2008). C-MAPSS data set. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository.http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic- data-repository

Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol 1.
Section
Technical Papers