Integrated Design of On-line Health and Prognostics Management



Published Mar 26, 2021
Mark Walker Ravi Kapadia


There are many difficulties associated with the design and implementation of on-line Prognostic Health Management (PHM) systems, including the tardy specification of requirements late in the design cycle, insufficient or conflicting input from pertinent stakeholders, difficult or costly access to domain knowledge, degree of difficulty in validating and testing functionality, and an ill- specified and mostly uncoordinated process. A new methodology is needed that will pull together and coordinate all of the pertinent information obtained from the various system analyses, designers, manufacturers, maintainers, and users at the earliest stages of system design. The methodology should involve a step-by-step process for obtaining information from the various stages of design, and provide mechanisms for modifying design analyses in support of PHM system specification. Additionally, PHM software platforms are needed to facilitate the implementation of these requirements, assist in testing and determining the validity of failure detection and health assessment, and provide powerful model-based reasoning capability that correlates over historical data and across subsystems within an operational context. This paper discusses the issues related to designing and delivering PHM systems, recommends a design methodology that can better address these issues, and describes how the underlying PHM software platform can aid and assist such a methodology to lower the cost, reduce the time to deliver, and increase the quality of next generation PHM systems.

How to Cite

Walker, M., & Kapadia, R. (2021). Integrated Design of On-line Health and Prognostics Management. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 1(1). Retrieved from
Abstract 3 | PDF Downloads 2




(Ammerman, 1998) M. Ammerman. The Root Cause Analysis Handbook.. New York, NY.: Productivity Press, 1998.
(Brignolo et al., 2001) R. Brignolo, F. Cascio, L. Console, P. Dague, P. Dubois, O. Dressler, et al., “Integration of Design and Diagnosis into a Common Process”. Electronic Systems for Vehicles, Duesseldorf: VDI Verlag, 2001, pp. 53-73.
(Butcher, 2000) S.W. Butcher, Assessment of Condition-Based Maintenance in the Department of Defense, Logistics Management Institute, McLean, VA 2000.
(Elsayed, 1996) E. Elsayed. Reliability Engineering. Reading, PA: Addison Wesley, 1996.
(Figueroa et al., 2006) F. Figueroa, R. Holland, J. Schmalzel, and D. Duncabage, “Integrated System Health Management (ISHM): Systematic Capability Implementation,” 2006 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, Houston, TX, April 2006
(Kapadia, 2003) Kapadia, R. “SymCure: A model- based approach for fault management with causal directed graphs”, Proc. Of the 16th Intl. Conf. IEA/AIE-03, pp. 582-591, Loughborough, UK
(Kapadia et al., 2007) R. Kapadia, G. Stanley, and M. Walker, “Real World Model-based Fault Management”. Proc. Of the 18th Intl. Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, Nashville, TN May 2007
(Kapadia et al., 2009) R. Kapadia, R. Gross, M. Walker, M. Venkatesh. “Health Monitoring Assessment and Prognostics (HealthMAPTM) for Advanced Arresting Gear System. Submitted to the
2nd Annual PHM Conference, 2009.
(Kurtoglu et al., 2008) T. Kurtoglu, S. Johnson, E.
Barszcz, J. Johnson, P . Robinson. “Integrating System Health Management into the Early Design of Aerospace Systems Using Functional Fault Analysis”. PHM’08, Denver, CO, 2008.
(Levitt, 2003) J. Levitt, Preventive and Predictive Maintenance. New York, NY: Industrial Press, 2003, pp. 123–135.
(DoD, 1980) Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (Military Standard), MIL-STD-1629A, Washington D.C.: Department of Defense, 1980.
(Moubray, 1997) J. Moubray. Reliability Centered Maintenance, Second Edition. New Y ork, NY : Industrial Press, 1997, pp. 123–135.
(NSSC, 2007) Reliability-Centered Maintenance Handbook, Washington D.C.: Naval Sea Systems Command, 2007.
(Okes, 2009) D. Okes. Root Cause Analysis. Milwaukee, WS: ASQ Quality Press, 2009
(ONRR, 1981) NUREG-0492 Fault Tree Handbook, Washington D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research,1981.
(Papadopoulos, 2003) Y . Papadopoulos, Model-based system monitoring and diagnosis of failures using state charts and fault trees. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2003
(Patterson-Hine et al., 2005) A. Patterson-Hine, G. Aaseng, G. Biswas, S. Narashimhan, K. Pattipati. “A Review of Diagnostic Techniques for ISHM Applications”. ISHM Forum 2005, Napa, CA
(Puri et al., 2006) G. Puri, D. Boylan, R. Walter, M. Lebold. “Building an OSA-CBM (Open Systems Architecture for Condition-based Maintenance) System”. Penn State – Air Force Research Labs, Nov 2006.
(Stamatis, 2003) D. H. Stamatis. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from theory to execution.. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality, 2003.
(Stamatelatos, 2002) D. Stamatelatos. Probabalistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners. Washington D.C.: NASA, 2002.
(Schwabacher and Goebel, 2007) M. Schwabacher and K. Goebel. A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics, in Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium, Arlington, VA, 2007.
(Schoeller et al., 2007) M. Schoeller, M. Roemer, M. Derriso. “Embedded PHM and Reasoning Integration Across Key Aerospace Vehicle
Systems”. Integrated Systems Health Management Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Aug. 2007.
(Walker, 2007) M. Walker, “Model-based Reasoning Applications for Remote Intelligent Systems Health Management”, ASNE Intelligent Ships Symposium,May 2007
(Walker et al., 2007) M. Walker, R. Kapadia, B.Sammuli, and M. Venkatesh “A Model-based Reasoning Framework for Condition-based Maintenance and Distance Support”, ASNE Automation and Controls Symposium, ASNE: Biloxi, MS, Dec. 2007
Technical Papers