ARINC 573/717, 767 and 647A: The Logical Choice for Maintenance Recording And IVHM Interface Control or Frame Updates

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 26, 2021
Michael D. Sudolsky

Abstract

Recorder utilization of data formatting standards enables abundant life-cycle savings, and this is addressed herein. The ARINC Standards cited in this paper’s title (i.e., ARINC 573/717, 767 and 647A) have, in large part, been developed to facilitate Flight Data Recorder (FDR) mandatory data capture requirements. These standards foster important equipment interchangeability or interoperability requirements, and, since they are also applicable to Aircraft Condition Monitoring System (ACMS) recording, critical Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) applications are supported. The Background material includes ARINC 647A Flight Recorder Electronic Documentation (FRED) definitions of 573/717 subframe and 767 frame recording, and “sets the stage” for following topics; important IVHM operations require the ability to continually improve or update recording, and FRED use as an IVHM Interface can indeed foster continual ACMS improvement/maturation. Additionally, the extension of these standards to any avionics controller or system interface lends itself to improved troubleshooting methods. This enhanced use of ARINC Standards is a crucial element of Health Ready Subsystem implementation, being prototyped in the Boeing IVHM Operational Environment.

How to Cite

D. Sudolsky, M. (2021). ARINC 573/717, 767 and 647A: The Logical Choice for Maintenance Recording And IVHM Interface Control or Frame Updates. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 1(1). Retrieved from https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/phmconf/article/view/1400
Abstract 510 | PDF Downloads 39

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

standards, applications: aviation

References
(Baldwin, 2008) A. Baldwin, “Boeing IVHM”, white paper provided to the University of MD over viewing Boeing IVHM activities, 2006.

(Li, 2008) W. Li, “Standards Delivery”, IEEE NANO Technology Magazine, 2008. iii

(Sudolsky, 2007) M. Sudolsky, “IVHM Solutions using commercially-available Aircraft Condition Monitoring Systems”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007.


(Withers, 2006) A. Withers, “Introduction to Data Frames and Flight Recording”, Boeing IVHM Strategic Forum, 2006.

(Cranfield, 2009) Cranfield University Short Course, Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) & Flight Operational Quality Assurance (FOQA) In Commercial Aviation. vi

(Sudolsky, 1997) M. Sudolsky, “Enhanced C-17 O-Level QAR Data Processing and Reporting”, AUTOTESTCON, 1997.


(Clark et al., 2007) G. Clark, “Multi-platform Airplane Health Management”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007.

(Keller et al., 1998) K. Keller, J. Holland, D. Bartz, K. Swearingen, “An Advanced Onboard Diagnostic System for Vehicle Management”, First IEEE International Workshop on System Testing and Diagnostics, 1998.

(Chidambaram et al., 2006) B. Chidambaram, “Recorders, Reasoners and Artificial Intelligence Integrated Diagnostics on the C-17 Aircraft”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2006.

(Sudolsky, 1998) M. Sudolsky, “The Fault Recording and reporting Method”, MDC 98K0007, AUTOTESTCON, 1998.

(Maggiore, 2003) J. Maggiore, “Always Fit to Fly”, http://www.boeing.com/commercial/news/feature/ahm. html, 2003.

(Williams, 2006) Z. Williams, “Benefits of IVHM: An Analytical Approach”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2006.

(Andresen, 2006) G. Andresen, "Providing BestValue IVHM Solutions for Aging Aircraft", Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft, 2006. xiv

(DSI, 2004) DSI International, “Modeling it Both Ways – Hybrid Diagnostic Modeling and its Application to Hierarchical Systems Designs”, AUTOTESTCON, 2004. xv

(Keller et al., 2007) K. Keller, “An Open Platform for Health Management Integration and Experimentation”, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007.
Section
Poster Presentations