A state-space model for multi-scale fatigue damage prognosis

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 26, 2021
Jingjing He Zizi Lu Yongming Liu

Abstract

Fatigue damage prognosis and diagnosis is of critical importance for the structural health management and is still a challenging problem despite extensive progresses during the last few decades. Traditional fatigue prognosis methods are cycle-based and have some inherent difficulties in the fatigue damage analysis. For example, cycle-based approach requires that the realistic load history needs to be transformed to the cycle history, which makes it impossible to perform the concurrent fatigue damage prognosis at the material and structure level. A novel methodology for concurrent multi-scale fatigue damage prognosis is proposed in this paper. The proposed methodology is based on an incremental time-based fatigue formulation, which is not cycle-based. By coupling the time-based fatigue growth mode with system dynamics, a set of first order differential equations can be setup using state-space concept to solve the structural dynamic response and fatigue crack growth concurrently. Hence, the fatigue damage prognosis can be performed both within an individual loading cycle scale and a loading history scale. Numerical examples for a single degree-of-freedom (DOF) system and a multiple DOF system are demonstrated using the proposed methodology. Coupon-level experimental data under variable amplitude loadings are used to validate and investigate the prognosis performance of the proposed concurrent state-space model.

 

How to Cite

He, J., Lu, Z. ., & Liu, Y. (2021). A state-space model for multi-scale fatigue damage prognosis. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 1(1). Retrieved from https://papers.phmsociety.org/index.php/phmconf/article/view/1396
Abstract 8 | PDF Downloads 2

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

damage detection, diagnosis, prognostics, time domain analysis

References
(Paris and Erdogan, 1963) P. Paris, F. Erdogan. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, pp. 528-534. 1963
(Porter, 1972) T. R. Porter. Method of analysis and prediction for variable amplitude fatigue crack growth, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 4(4): pp. 717-736. 1972
(Craig, 1981) R. R. Craig. Structural dynamics: an introduction to computer methods, Wiley, pp. 389- 403. 1981
(Sandor and Richter, 1987) B. I. Sandor and K. J. Richter. Engineering Mechanics Dynamics, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, pp.528-533. 1987
(Schutz, 1996) W. Schutz. A history of fatigue, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 54: p. 37. 1996 (Mercer et al., 1997) C. Mercer, S. Shademan and W.
O. Soboyejo. An investigation of the effects of stress ratio and crack closure on the micromechanisms of fatigue crack growth in Ti- 6AL-4V , Acta Materialia, 45(7): pp. 2777-2787. 1997
(Nagy, 1998) P. B. Nagy. Fatigue damage assessment by nonlinear ultrasonic materials characterization, Ultrasonic, 36: pp. 375-381. 1998
(Patankar and Ray, 1998) R. Patankar, A. Ray and A. Lakhtakia. A state-space model of fatigue crack growth, International Journal of Fracture, 90: pp. 235-249. 1998
(Patankar and Ray, 2000) R. Patankar and A. Ray. (2000). State-space modeling of fatigue crack growth in ductile alloys. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 66(2): p. 129-151. 2000
(Janssen, 2004) M. Janssen. Fracture Mechanics, Taylor and Francis, pp. 348. 2004
(Riera et al., 2004) J. J. Riera, J. Watanabe, I. Kazuki, M. Naoki, E. Aubert, T. Ozaki and R. Kawashima. A state-space model of the hemodynamic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals, NeuroImage, (21): pp.547-567. 2004
(Inman et al., 2005) D. J. Inman, C. R. Farrar, V. Lopes Junior and V. Steffen Junior. Damage prognosis: for aerospace, civil and mechanical systems, Wiley, pp.1-11. 2005
(Farrar and Lieven, 2006) C. R. Farrar and N. A. J. Lieven. Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring, Philosophical transactions, 365:pp. 623-632. 2006
(Paz, 2006) M. Paz. Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation, Springer, pp. 305-347. 2006
(Suresh, 2006) S. Suresh. (July 2006). Fatigue of Material, Cambridge University Press, pp. 235-275.2006
(Link and Weiland, 2009) M. Link and M. Weiland.
Damage identification by multi-model updating in the modal and in the time domain, Mechanical system and signal processing, 23: pp.1734-1746. 2009
(Lu and Liu, 2009) Z. Lu and Y. Liu. An Incremental Crack Growth Model for Multi-Scale Fatigue Analysis, 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 2009
Section
Poster Presentations

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>