Impact of Reactive Power Assumptions on Physics-Informed Assessment of Transformer Ageing in Distribution Networks

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Junyi Lu
Blair Brown
Qiteng Hong
Campbell Booth
Bruce Stephen

Abstract

Power distribution networks are undergoing a fundamental shift in their utilisation driven by the rapid increase in the prevalence of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems, coupled with the increasing penetration of inverter-based household loads (such as heat pumps), changing expected reactive power flows. However, many Distribution System Operators (DSOs) have limited reactive power monitoring and instead rely on historical constant power factor assumptions, masking the true transformer current and thermal stress, resulting in biased lifetime estimates. This paper proposes an assessment methodology that integrates a low-voltage distribution network model with the physics-based IEEE C57.91 transformer thermal-ageing model to quantify transformer loss of life. The methodology evaluates different LCT penetration levels using representative load and reactive-power profiles. The methodology is demonstrated using a spatially coherent real-world distribution network model, derived from geographical network data, with PV generation and residential load profiles. We conduct a comparative analysis between the standard DSO assumption (constant power factor) and the actual reactive power profile. The results indicate that the assumption of a constant power factor of 0.95 significantly over/underestimates total current and thermal stress, resulting in biased transformer health assessments. The study demonstrates that a revised reactive power assumption is an important consideration for transformer health assessment and asset-management decisions.

How to Cite

Lu, J., Brown, B., Hong, Q., Booth, . C., & Stephen, B. (2026). Impact of Reactive Power Assumptions on Physics-Informed Assessment of Transformer Ageing in Distribution Networks. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.5031
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Reactive Power, Distribution Transformers, Physics-Informed Health Assessment, Loss of Life (LoL), LCTs

References
Anderson, H. C., Al Hadi, A., Jones, E. S., & Ionel, D. M. (2021). Power factor and reactive power in US residences: Survey and EnergyPlus modeling. In 2021 10th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA) (pp. 418–422). doi: 10.1109/ICRERA52334.2021.9598561

Azadfar, E., Sreeram, V., & Harries, D. (2015). The investigation of the major factors influencing plug-in electric vehicle driving patterns and charging behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1065–1076.

Datsan Transformer. (2020). 500 kVA 20/0.4 kV copper winding standard losses transformer. Retrieved March 22, 2026, from https://www.datsan.com.tr/en/products/three-phase-distribution-transformers/101-20-kv-series-distribution-transformers/274-500-kva-20-400-copper-standard%20losses-oil-immersed-distribution-transformer.html

Efkarpidis, N., De Rybel, T., & Driesen, J. (2016). Technical assessment of centralized and localized voltage control strategies in low-voltage networks. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 8, 85–97.

Elektro. (2023). OPSCI. Retrieved November 9, 2025, from https://www.elektro-ljubljana.si/projekti/ArtMID/1374/ArticleID/2156/OPSCI-Open-SCI

Elexon. (2013). Load profiles and their use in settlement [Technical report]. Retrieved from https://www.elexon.co.uk/guidance-note/load-profiles/

EPRI. (2024). OpenDSS documentation. Retrieved March 24, 2026, from https://opendss.epri.com/

Hungbo, M., Gu, M., Meegahapola, L., Littler, T., & Bu, S. (2023). Impact of electric vehicles on low-voltage residential distribution networks: A probabilistic analysis. IET Smart Grid, 6(5), 536–548.

IEEE. (2011). IEEE recommended practice for interconnecting distributed resources with electric power systems distribution secondary networks. IEEE Standards Association.

IEEE C57.91-2025. (2025). IEEE guide for loading mineral-oil-immersed transformers and step-voltage regulators (IEEE Std C57.91-2025).

Krause, C., de Pablo, A., Devaux, F., Ding, H., Katshuna, V., Lukic, J., ... Walker, D. (2022). The condition of solid transformer insulation at end-of-life. ELECTRA, 321, 1–18. Retrieved March 2, 2026, from https://electra.cigre.org/321-april-2022/reference-paper/the-condition-of-solid-transformer-insulation-at-end-of-life.html

McBee, K. D. (2017). Transformer aging due to high penetrations of PV, EV charging, and energy storage applications. In 2017 Ninth Annual IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech) (pp. 163–170). doi: 10.1109/GreenTech.2017.30

Ofgem. (2021). DNO common network asset indices methodology [Technical report]. Retrieved March 2, 2026, from https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2021/04/dno_common_network_asset_indices_methodology_v2.1_final_01-04-2021.pdf

Paterakis, N. G., Pappi, I. N., Erdinç, O., Godina, R., Rodrigues, E. M. G., & Catalão, J. P. S. (2016). Consideration of the impacts of a smart neighborhood load on transformer aging. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(6), 2793–2802. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2501380

Pavlicevic, A., & Mujovic, S. (2022). Impact of reactive power from public electric vehicle stations on transformer aging and active energy losses. Energies, 15(19), 7085.

Pezeshki, H., & Wolfs, P. (2013). Impact of high PV penetration on distribution transformer lifetime. In 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (pp. 1–5). doi: 10.1109/PESMG.2013.6672074

Protopapadaki, C., & Saelens, D. (2017). Heat pump and PV impact on residential low-voltage distribution grids as a function of building and district properties. Applied Energy, 192, 268–281.

Quiros, J., Ochoa, L. F., & Lees, B. (2015). A statistical analysis of EV charging behavior in the UK. In 2015 IEEE/PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM) (pp. 1–6).

Refaat, A., Kalas, A., Daoud, A., & Bendary, F. (2012). A control methodology of grid-connected PV system to verify the standard IEEE 929-2000. Energy, 1, 2.

Rezaeimozafar, M., Monaghan, R. F., Barrett, E., & Duffy, M. (2022). A review of behind-the-meter energy storage systems in smart grids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 164, 112573.

Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks. (2024). Network visibility strategy. Retrieved from https://www.ssen.co.uk/globalassets/about-us/stakeholder-engagement/annual-engagement-plans-and-reports/ssen-network-visibility-strategy-feb-2024.pdf

UK Power Networks. (2026). Photovoltaic (PV) solar panel energy generation data. London Datastore. Retrieved March 22, 2026, from https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/photovoltaic-pv-solar-panel-energy-generation-data-2nlqm/

UKPN. (2014). Low Carbon London: Heat pump load profiles. London Datastore. Retrieved from https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/low-carbon-london-heat-pump-load-profiles-2nlrm/

Vita, V., Fotis, G., Chobanov, V., Pavlatos, C., & Mladenov, V. (2023). Predictive maintenance for distribution system operators in increasing transformers’ reliability. Electronics, 12(6), 1356.

Weatherhead, S., & Higgins, C. (2015). Future roadmap for improvement of HV & LV network modelling (Technical Report No. 7640-08-R0). SP Energy Networks.
Section
Technical Papers