Maintenance Planning for Prognostic Health Management of Multi-Component Systems: A Case Study of Multi-Objective Optimisation for Railway Vehicles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Bernd Wagner
Sofoklis Kitharidis
Furong Ye
Thomas Bäck
Niki van Stein

Abstract

Condition-based maintenance (CBM) offers an opportunity to improve classical preventive maintenance strategies by transitioning to a dedicated prognostics & health management (PHM) strategy for individual components. This means that time-based fixed maintenance intervals are being replaced by condition-dependent and component-specific interventions.

For multi-component, complex systems, such a component-condition-based maintenance strategy yields multiple remaining useful life (RUL) prognostics. Maintainers must combine these into optimal maintenance plans that account for reliability, availability, maintainability, safety and costs (RAMS-C). Combining multiple RUL prognostics with the system's real-world dynamics, including architecture, anticipated future operating conditions, economic interdependence, stochastic interdependence and structural interdependence, yields complex maintenance planning decisions. To address this problem, several studies propose solutions based on multi-objective optimisation algorithms. However, these are often based on a priori knowledge and do not account for the day-to-day dynamics of operational variations. This paper presents a methodology for managing the complexity of maintenance scheduling under these conditions. The model is applied to the maintenance history of a Voith Maxima 30CC cargo locomotive. A priori maintenance models are compared with real-life implementation and optimised models using evolutionary multi-objective optimisation (EMO) to assess the rigour of the a priori plans under varying operating conditions. The study shows that applying such algorithms can significantly reduce costs while increasing overall system reliability and availability.

How to Cite

Wagner, B., Kitharidis, S., Ye, F., Bäck, T., & van Stein, N. (2026). Maintenance Planning for Prognostic Health Management of Multi-Component Systems: A Case Study of Multi-Objective Optimisation for Railway Vehicles. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.5006
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

RUL, Complex Systems, Multi-Component, Multi-Objective optimisation, Maintenance planning

References
Bäck, T. H. W., et al. (2023). Evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization: Thirty years later. Evolutionary Computation, 31(2), 81–122.

Boujamza, A., & Lissane Elhaq, S. (2024). Optimizing remaining useful life predictions for aircraft engines: A dilated recurrent neural network approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(13), 811–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.582

Chen, Y., & Liu, C. (2025). Sequential multi-objective multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for system predictive maintenance of turbofan engine. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 67, 103553. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.103553

Chengshan, Y., et al. (2026). RAMS-based modeling and decision optimization for condition-based maintenance strategies of EMU components. Measurement, 268, 120523. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2026.120523

Deb, K., Pratap, A., et al. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

Deb, K., Sindhya, K., & Hakanen, J. (2016). Multi-objective optimization. In Decision sciences (pp. 161–200). CRC Press.

Du, Y., et al. (2025). Dynamic preventive maintenance model for offshore wind turbine bearings based on remaining useful life prediction. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 84. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2025.104750

Heng, R. B. W., & Nor, M. J. M. (1998). Statistical analysis of sound and vibration signals for monitoring rolling element bearing condition. Applied Acoustics, 53(1–3), 211–226. doi: 10.1016/S0003-682X(97)00018-2

Ji, D., et al. (2021). A review: Data-driven-based fault diagnosis and RUL prediction of petroleum machinery and equipment. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 9(1), 724–747. doi: 10.1080/21642583.2021.1992684

Jin, Y., Jiang, Z., & Hou, W. (2008). Multi-objective integrated optimization research on preventive maintenance planning and production scheduling for a single machine. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(9–10), 954–964. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1268-5

Kumar, D., Kalra, S., & Jha, M. S. (2022). A concise review on degradation of gun barrels and its health monitoring techniques. Engineering Failure Analysis, 142, 106791. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106791

Lei, J., et al. (2022). A review: Prediction method for the remaining useful life of the mechanical system. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 22(6), 2119–2137. doi: 10.1007/s11668-022-01532-4

Lipu, M. S. H., et al. (2018). A review of state of health and remaining useful life estimation methods for lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles: Challenges and recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 115–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.065

Olde Keizer, M. C. A., Flapper, S. D. P., & Teunter, R. H. (2017). Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(2), 405–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.044

Rahimi, I., et al. (2022). Scheduling by NSGA-II: Review and bibliometric analysis. Processes, 10(1), 98. doi: 10.3390/pr10010098

Rezamand, M., et al. (2020). Critical wind turbine components prognostics: A comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 69(12), 9306–9328. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3030165

Saxena, A., et al. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (pp. 1–9). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414

Wang, K., Deng, C., & Ding, L. (2020). Optimal condition-based maintenance strategy for multi-component systems under degradation failures. Energies, 13(17). doi: 10.3390/en13174346

Wang, L., Zhu, Z., & Zhao, X. (2024). Dynamic predictive maintenance strategy for system remaining useful life prediction via deep learning ensemble method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245.

Wang, Z., et al. (2025). A multi-objective optimization model for predictive opportunistic maintenance of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 132, 117902. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.117902

Wu, T., et al. (2020). Dynamic maintenance strategy with iteratively updated group information. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 197, 106820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106820

Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6), 712–731.

Zhou, Y., et al. (2022). Tool wear mechanism, monitoring and remaining useful life (RUL) technology based on big data: A review. SN Applied Sciences, 4(8), 232. doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-05114-9
Section
Technical Papers