Trustworthy Abnormality Detection from Welding Images Through Class-Conditional Conformal Learning and Bayesian Cost Minimization

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Zhenling Chen Zhiguo Zeng

Abstract

Industrial fault/abnormality detection is often criticized for lacking explainability and robustness. Furthermore, practical industrial datasets are frequently highly imbalanced and operate under extreme risk asymmetry, i.e., false negatives carry penalties orders of magnitude higher than false alarms, which poses significant challenges to reliable detection. In this paper, we develop a trustworthy AI framework to improve confidence in welding defect detection. The proposed framework integrates two primary techniques: class-conditional conformal learning and Bayesian cost minimization. First, the conformal learning model quantifies the trustworthiness of model predictions. Instead of forcing a binary classification, the model outputs an "uncertain" state when confidence is low, facilitating informed human intervention. Second, a Bayesian cost minimization algorithm is used to avoid over-conservative predictions that yield too many "uncertain" predictions. Results on a real-world welding quality inspection dataset show that the developed method adapts robustly to dynamic intervention costs and mitigates worst-case cost spikes. The framework is deployment-oriented: it is not uniformly optimal in every setting, but it consistently avoids catastrophic failures and maintains a favorable cost–accuracy–intervention trade-off across heterogeneous base-model qualities.

How to Cite

Chen, Z., & Zeng, Z. (2026). Trustworthy Abnormality Detection from Welding Images Through Class-Conditional Conformal Learning and Bayesian Cost Minimization. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4988
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

trustworthy AI, abnormality detection, welding inspection, conformal prediction, cost-sensitive learning, uncertainty quantification

References
Bates, S., Angelopoulos, A., Lei, L., Malik, J., & Jordan, M. I. (2021). Distribution-free, risk-controlling prediction sets. Journal of the ACM (JACM).

Chen, Z., & Zeng, Z. (n.d.). CCCP-Bayes: Code and experiment artifacts. Retrieved from https://github.com/JialingRichard/CCCP-Bayes

Chow, C. K. (1970). On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 16(1), 41–46.

Elkan, C. (2001). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).

ETAI Association. (n.d.). Welding quality detection challenge: Official website, dataset and evaluation protocol. Retrieved from https://etaia.github.io/Welding-Quality-Detection-Challenge/

Geifman, Y., & El-Yaniv, R. (2017). Selective classification for deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Howard, R. A. (1966). Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2(1), 22–26.

Romano, Y., Sesia, M., & Candès, E. (2020). Classification with valid and adaptive coverage. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Sadinle, M., Lei, J., & Wasserman, L. (2019). Least ambiguous set-valued classifiers with bounded error levels. Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA).

Stankevičiūtė, K., et al. (2021). Conformal time-series forecasting. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).

Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., & Shafer, G. (2005). Algorithmic learning in a random world. Springer.
Section
Technical Papers