Failure-Mode-Informed Development of Remaining Useful Life Prognostics

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Kiavash Fathi Mihaela Mitici Tobias Kleinert Hans Wernher van de Venn

Abstract

Various environmental and operating conditions affect the degradation behavior of physical assets, leading to various degradation trajectories and ultimately to distinct failure modes. To obtain accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction, it is important to distinguish between such degradation trajectories and their associated failure modes. In this paper, we develop a framework where we analyze the latent space of autoencoders using spectral clustering to evaluate the similarity in degradation trajectories and failure modes in training datasets. This failure-mode-informed training sets are then used to develop failure-specific regressors for RUL prediction. On one hand, this reduces the amount of data needed to effectively train prognostics models. In addition, the accuracy of the RUL predictions is further improved. We demonstrate this using the C-MAPSS dataset, which provides fleet-based run-to-failure sequences under varying operating conditions and failure modes. We argue that latent information about different degradation mechanisms can be inferred from sensor readings, enabling the construction of failure-mode-specific RUL regressors. Our results show that this failure-mode-informed data separation reduces the amount of training data needed to generate RUL prognostics by up to 55%, while simultaneously improving prognostics accuracy - the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is reduced by 3%.

How to Cite

Fathi, K., Mitici, M., Kleinert, T., & van de Venn, H. W. (2026). Failure-Mode-Informed Development of Remaining Useful Life Prognostics. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4987
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Remaining Useful Life Prognostics, Failure-Mode-Informed Learning, Latent Space Clustering, Data-Efficient Machine Learning, C-MAPSS Dataset

References
Aydemir, G., & Acar, B. (2020). Anomaly monitoring improves remaining useful life estimation of industrial machinery. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56, 463–469.

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794).

De Pater, I., Reijns, A., & Mitici, M. (2022). Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect remaining useful life prognostics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 221, 108341.

European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 10: Data and data governance. Official text of the Artificial Intelligence Act. Retrieved from https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/10/

Fähndrich, J. (2023). A literature review on the impact of digitalisation on management control. Journal of Management Control, 34(1), 9–65.

Fathi, K., Ristin, M., Sadurski, M., Kleinert, T., & Van De Venn, H. W. (2024). Detection of novel asset failures in predictive maintenance using classifier certainty. In 2024 32nd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) (pp. 50–56).

Fathi, K., Sadurski, M., Kleinert, T., & van de Venn, H. W. (2023). Source component shift detection and classification for improved remaining useful life estimation in alarm-based predictive maintenance. In 2023 23rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) (pp. 975–980).

Fathi, K., & van de Venn, H. W. (2024). Data, models, and performance: A comprehensive guide to predictive maintenance in industrial settings. In Recent topics in maintenance management. IntechOpen.

Fathi, K., van de Venn, H. W., & Honegger, M. (2021). Predictive maintenance: An autoencoder anomaly-based approach for a 3-DOF delta robot. Sensors, 21(21), 6979.

Faubel, L., Schmid, K., & Eichelberger, H. (2023). MLOps challenges in Industry 4.0. SN Computer Science, 4(6), 828.

Hou, G., Xu, S., Zhou, N., Yang, L., & Fu, Q. (2020). Remaining useful life estimation using deep convolutional generative adversarial networks based on an autoencoder scheme. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2020/9601389

Jiang, J.-R., & Kuo, C.-K. (2017). Enhancing convolutional neural network deep learning for remaining useful life estimation in smart factory applications. In 2017 International Conference on Information, Communication and Engineering (ICICE) (pp. 120–123).

Legenvre, H., Autio, E., & Hameri, A.-P. (2025). Creating value by combining AI and other open technologies: Cloud infrastructure as a pivotal asset. In Contemporary issues in Industry 5.0: Towards an AI-integrated society (pp. 137–161). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Li, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, D., Keutzer, K., Darrell, T., & Zhao, H. (2021). Learning invariant representations and risks for semi-supervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1104–1113).

Liu, Z., Miao, Z., Pan, X., Zhan, X., Lin, D., Yu, S. X., & Gong, B. (2020). Open compound domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 12406–12415).

Mitici, M., de Pater, I., Barros, A., & Zeng, Z. (2023). Dynamic predictive maintenance for multiple components using data-driven probabilistic RUL prognostics: The case of turbofan engines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 234, 109199.

Nejjar, I., Geissmann, F., Zhao, M., Taal, C., & Fink, O. (2024). Domain adaptation via alignment of operation profile for remaining useful lifetime prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 242, 109718.

Quiñonero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., Schwaighofer, A., & Lawrence, N. D. (2022). Dataset shift in machine learning. MIT Press.

Rivas, A., Delipei, G. K., & Hou, J. (2022). Predictions of component remaining useful lifetime using Bayesian neural network. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 146, 104143.

Saxena, A., & Goebel, K. (2008). Turbofan engine degradation simulation data set [Data set]. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, 18, 878–887.

Von Luxburg, U. (2007). A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and Computing, 17, 395–416.

Wang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2024). A lightweight sensing data integrity detection method for the industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(15), 25030–25040.

Wu, F., Wu, Q., Tan, Y., & Xu, X. (2024). Remaining useful life prediction based on deep learning: A survey. Sensors, 24, 3454. doi: 10.3390/s24113454

Yan, P., Abdulkadir, A., Luley, P.-P., Rosenthal, M., Schatte, G. A., Grewe, B. F., & Stadelmann, T. (2024). A comprehensive survey of deep transfer learning for anomaly detection in industrial time series: Methods, applications, and directions. IEEE Access, 12, 3768–3789. doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3349132

Yang, H., & Desell, T. (2022). A large-scale annotated multivariate time series aviation maintenance dataset from the NGAFID. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07317.

Zhou, K., Liu, Z., Qiao, Y., Xiang, T., & Loy, C. C. (2022). Domain generalization: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(4), 4396–4415.
Section
Technical Papers