Robust Real-Time Thrust Fault Diagnosis for UAVs: A Physics-Informed Framework DecouplingWind Disturbances

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Taegyun Kim Seungkeun Kim

Abstract

Operational reliability of multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is frequently compromised by the ambiguity between external wind disturbances and internal thrust faults. This paper proposes a physics-informed fault diagnosis (PIFDI) framework that explicitly decouples wind-induced effects from total observed disturbances. By integrating an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) for real-time wind estimation and a Disturbance Observer (DOB) for total torque monitoring, the framework isolates a clean fault residual through physical coefficient mapping. High-fidelity 6-DOF simulations involving Dryden turbulence and non-stationary discrete gusts demonstrate a rapid detection latency of 0.18 s for a 20% thrust loss, maintaining near-zero false alarms even during peak gust periods. Furthermore, a 300-trial Monte Carlo simulation confirmed high fault isolation accuracy, demonstrating
superior statistical robustness across varying wind intensities and randomized fault modes. The proposed physicsinformed
decoupling approach significantly enhances diagnostic resilience, providing a critical foundation for real-time fault-tolerant control in mission-critical UAV operations.

How to Cite

Kim, T., & Kim, S. (2026). Robust Real-Time Thrust Fault Diagnosis for UAVs: A Physics-Informed Framework DecouplingWind Disturbances. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4983
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Thrust fault diagnosis, Multi-rotor UAV, Wind disturbance decoupling, Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Disturbance observer (DOB), Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI)

References
Ben, A., et al. (2022). New robust backstepping attitude control approach applied to Quanser 3-DOF hover quadrotor in the case of actuator faults. Nonlinear Dynamics, 108(3), 2145–2160.

Cao, L., Yang, X., Wang, G., Liu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). Fault detection based on extended state observer and interval observer for UAVs. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 94(10), 1759–1771.

Dingeldein, L. (2024). Integration of condition information in UAV swarm management to increase system availability in dynamic environments. In 8th European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society (pp. 565–575).

Du, Y., Huang, P., Cheng, Y., Fan, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Fault-tolerant control of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle based on active disturbance rejection control and two-stage Kalman filter. IEEE Access, 11(1), 67556–67566.

Guo, K., Jia, J., Yu, X., Guo, L., & Xie, L. (2020). Multiple observers-based anti-disturbance control for a quadrotor UAV against payload and wind disturbances. Control Engineering Practice, 102, 104560.

Jeong, H., Suk, J., & Kim, S. (2024). Control of quadrotor UAV using variable disturbance observer-based strategy. Control Engineering Practice, 150, 105990.

Jing, Y., Mirza, A., Sipahi, R., & Martinez-Lorenzo, J. (2023). Sliding mode controller with disturbance observer for quadcopters: Experiments with dynamic disturbances and in turbulent indoor space. Drones, 7(5), 328.

Kim, T., Jeong, H., & Kim, S. (2024). Thrust-fault diagnosis of hexacopter UAV using supervised learning with disturbance observers. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 22(12), 3584–3594.

Langelaan, J. W., Alley, N., & Neidhoefer, J. (2011). Wind field estimation for small unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(4), 1016–1030.

Lee, J. D., Kim, Y., Kim, Y., Lee, H., Cha, J.-H., & Bang, H. (2026). Sensor and actuator fault detection and isolation for urban air mobility. IEEE Sensors Journal.

Liu, X., et al. (2020). Nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for a quadrotor UAV with a total rotor failure. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 357(15), 10532–10550.

Nguyen, N., et al. (2024). Adaptive backstepping sliding mode fault-tolerant control of quadrotor UAV in the presence of external disturbances, uncertainties, and simultaneous actuator and sensor faults. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 19(1), 7018.

Shim, H., Park, G., Joo, Y., Back, J., & Jo, N. H. (2016). Yet another tutorial of disturbance observer: Robust stabilization and recovery of nominal performance. Control Theory and Technology, 14(3), 237–249.

Wang, B., et al. (2021). Incremental sliding-mode fault-tolerant flight control. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(10), 1870–1882.

Zhao, L., et al. (2025). Experimental test of a two-stage Kalman filter for actuator fault detection and diagnosis of an unmanned quadrotor helicopter. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 34(2), 550–562.

Zyadat, Z., Horri, N., Innocente, M., & Statheros, T. (2023). Observer-based optimal control of a quadplane with active wind disturbance and actuator fault rejection. Sensors, 23(4), 1954.
Section
Technical Papers