Hybrid Detection for Heat Pump Contamination Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Ahmed Qarqour Gernot Heisenberg Sahil-Jai Arora Drazen Martinovic

Abstract

The deployment of residential heat pump systems is a key enabler of the decarbonization of the heating sector. However, their long-term reliability remains a barrier to sustained performance and user acceptance. A major degradation driver is water contamination within the hydraulic circuit, which leads to fouling, scaling, and corrosion of components such as plate heat exchangers – ultimately reducing efficiency and shortening system lifetime. Although installation procedures and operational filtration measures, including magnetite filtration, aim to reduce particle accumulation, continuous condition-based monitoring of component degradation remains limited. To address the scarcity of real-world failure data for training predictive models, this paper proposes a physics-informed, data-prior approach that combines physical knowledge with machine learning. Instead of embedding physics into the model architecture or loss functions, the approach incorporates it at the data level by generating labeled healthy and faulty scenarios through a physics-based laboratory setup. This enables the model to learn degradation patterns grounded in physical behavior, supporting early fault detection and producing outputs that remain interpretable and plausible for domain experts. The approach is demonstrated on a plate heat exchanger contamination use case. A design-of-experiments campaign in a climate chamber generated labeled data representing healthy, moderately contaminated, and severely contaminated states. A Random Forest classifier achieved consistent cross-validation performance (AUC ≈ 0.98) with low variance across folds. Precision–recall analysis revealed robust early fault detection, with average precision values of approximately 0.96 for moderate contamination and 0.97 for severe contamination. Cumulative gain and lift analyses indicated that inspecting the top 20–40 % of systems ranked by model risk can identify 80–100 % of the contaminated cases, supporting efficient maintenance prioritization. Model-derived feature importance was assessed using Gini importance and subsequently validated through expert review, enabling interpretable failure logic for condition-based maintenance strategies. The results demonstrate that combining physically grounded data, supervised machine learning, and explainable diagnostics provides a transferable hybrid approach for interpretable reliability assessment and condition-based monitoring beyond the specific case.

How to Cite

Qarqour, A., Heisenberg, G., Arora, S.-J., & Martinovic, D. (2026). Hybrid Detection for Heat Pump Contamination Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4979
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Heat Pump Reliability, Water Contamination, Hybrid Approach, Explainable Machine Learning, Fault Detection

References
Alhuthali, S., Delaplace, G., Macchietto, S., & Bouvier, L. (2022). Whey protein fouling prediction in plate heat exchanger by combining dynamic modelling, dimensional analysis, and symbolic regression. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 134, 163–180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2022.05.009

Ardsomang, T., Hines, J. W., & Upadhyaya, B. R. (2013). Heat exchanger fouling and estimation of remaining useful life. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2013.

Berce, J., Zupančič, M., Može, M., & Golobič, I. (2021). A review of crystallization fouling in heat exchangers. Processes, 9(8), 1356. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081356

Brudermüller, T., Potthoff, U., & Fleisch, E. (2025). Estimation of energy efficiency of heat pumps in residential buildings using real operation data. Nature Communications, 16, 2834. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58014-y

Hou, G., Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Application of machine learning algorithms in real-time health status monitoring of plate heat exchangers. Applied Thermal Engineering, Article S0735-1933(25)00234-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.120456

Ikonen, E., Liukkonen, M., Hansen, A. H., Edelborg, M., Kjos, O., Selek, I., & Kettunen, A. (2023). Fouling monitoring in a circulating fluidized bed boiler using direct and indirect model-based analytics. Fuel, 346, 128341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128341

International Energy Agency. (2022). The future of heat pumps. IEA. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-heat-pumps

Jnod Energy. (2025). How does a plate heat exchanger work in a heat pump? Retrieved January 26, 2026, from https://www.jnodenergy.com/how-does-a-plate-heat-exchanger-work-in-a-heat-pump/

Kapustenko, P., Klemeš, J. J., & Arsenyeva, O. (2023). Plate heat exchangers fouling mitigation effects in heating of water solutions: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 179, 113283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113283

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kouidri, I., Dahmani, A., Furizal, F., Ma’arif, A., Mostfa, A. A., Amrane, A., Mouni, L., & Sharkawy, A.-N. (2025). Artificial intelligence-based techniques for fouling resistance estimation of shell and tube heat exchanger: Cascaded forward and recurrent models. Eng, 6(5), 85. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6050085

Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024

Meng, C., Griesemer, S., Cao, D., Seo, S., & Yan, L. (2025). When physics meets machine learning: A survey of physics-informed machine learning. Machine Learning in Computational Science and Engineering, 1, Article 20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44379-025-00016-0

Munnangi, A., Mohamed Arshath, S., Karthikeyan, C., Muthamizhi, K., & Praveenkumar, V. (2026). Plate heat exchangers and their versatile applications: Artificial neural networks. In R. K. Arya, G. D. Verros, & J. P. Davim (Eds.), Smart heat transfer and thermal management (Woodhead Publishing Reviews: Mechanical Engineering Series, pp. 273–296). Woodhead Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-33881-6.00014-9

Patil, P., Srinivasan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2022). Monitoring fouling in heat exchangers under temperature control based on excess thermal and hydraulic loads. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 181, 41–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.02.032

Qarqour, A., Arora, S. J., Heisenberg, G., Rabe, M., & Kleinert, T. (2024). Utilizing data analysis for optimized determination of the current operational state of heating systems. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (KDIR) (pp. 200–209). SciTePress. doi: https://doi.org/10.5220/0012876200003838

Qarqour, A., Arora, S. J., Heisenberg, G., Rabe, M., & Kleinert, T. (2025). Towards systematic reliability assessment: A multi-criteria decision framework for modeling heat pump systems. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2025, 5(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.36001/phmap.2025.v5i1.4463

Romanowicz, T., Taler, J., Jaremkiewicz, M., & Sobota, T. (2023). Determination of heat transfer correlations for fluids flowing through plate heat exchangers needed for online monitoring of district heat exchanger fouling. Energies, 16(17), 6264. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176264

Sansana, J., Rendall, R., Castillo, I., de Bruijne, L., Huggins, J., Phillips, A., & Reis, M. S. (2024). Hybrid approach for advanced monitoring and forecasting of fouling with application to an ethylene oxide plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(24), 10666–10676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00298

Soomro, A. W., Mat Kiah, M. L., Md Noor, R., Newaz Kazi, S., Shaikh, K., Khan, W. A., & Ali, I. (2026). Artificial intelligence in industrial heat exchanger fouling prediction: A 20-year systematic review of AI, ML, and DL approaches. ICT Express, 12(1), 92–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2025.12.003

Sundar, S., & Rajagopal, R. (2020). Fouling modeling and prediction approach for heat exchangers using deep learning. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 159, 120112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120112

Tovazhnyanskyy, L., Sherstyuk, V., Kapustenko, P., Khavin, G., Perevertaylenko, A., Boldyryev, S., & Garev, A. (2007). Plate heat exchangers for environmentally friendly heat pumps. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 12, 213–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET0712037

Virginia Heat Transfer. (2021). Plate exchanger: Fouling vs scaling. Retrieved January 26, 2026, from https://vaheat.com/?p=147

Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A. (2024). Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 255(Part C), 124678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678
Section
Technical Papers