Cost-Sensitive Deep Learning for Scania Component X: Minimising Operational Cost via Asymmetric Threshold Optimisation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Abdelhakim Mraihi Valeriu Dimidov Raoof Doorshi Reza Khoshkangini

Abstract

Maintenance decisions in industrial fleets must balance the cost of unnecessary interventions against the higher cost of missed failures. This paper presents a cost-sensitive deep learning approach for the Scania Component X benchmark. Rather than predicting the original five degradation classes directly, the problem is reformulated as a binary task that identifies whether a vehicle is healthy or at risk based on recent operational data. The predicted risk score is then converted into a maintenance decision through asymmetric threshold optimisation under the official Scania 5×5 cost matrix. Three temporal deep learning models—CNN, Transformer, and Temporal Convolutional Networks—are evaluated under the same cost-aware training and decision setting. Results on real data from thousands of heavy-duty trucks show how cost-sensitive learning affects the trade-off between failure avoidance, maintenance workload, and total operational cost.

How to Cite

Mraihi, A., Dimidov, V. ., Doorshi, R. ., & Khoshkangini, R. . (2026). Cost-Sensitive Deep Learning for Scania Component X: Minimising Operational Cost via Asymmetric Threshold Optimisation. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4963
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Cost-sensitive learning, Deep learning, Maintenance decision-making, Predictive maintenance, Scania Component X, Threshold optimisation, Time-series classification, Heavy-duty trucks

References
Carpentier, L., De Temmerman, A., & Verbeke, M. (2024). Towards contextual, cost-efficient predictive maintenance in heavy-duty trucks. In International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (pp. 260–267).

Chehade, A., et al. (2022). Conditional Gaussian mixture model for warranty claims forecasting. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108180. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108180

Deldari, S., Loke, S. W., & Zaslavsky, A. (2023). Predictive maintenance using deep learning: Review, challenges, and industrial applications. Sensors, 23(13), 6058. doi: 10.3390/s23136058

Ding, B., & Fang, H. (2017). Fault prediction for nonlinear stochastic systems with incipient faults. ISA Transactions, 68, 327–334.

Dintén, R., Zorrilla, M., Veloso, B., & Gama, J. (2025). Building of transformer-based RUL predictors supported by explainability techniques: Application on real industrial datasets. Information Fusion, 103892.

Johnson, J. M., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2021). Thresholding strategies for deep learning with highly imbalanced big data. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1232, pp. 123–136). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-6759-9_9

Kharazian, Z., Lindgren, T., Magnússon, S., Steinert, O., & Andersson Reyna, O. (2025). Scania Component X dataset: A real-world multivariate time-series dataset for predictive maintenance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15199.

Khoshkangini, R., Mashhadi, P. S., Tegnered, D., & Rognvaldsson, T. (2022). Vehicles behavioral prediction using multi-task ensemble learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4087639

Khoshkangini, R., Pashami, S., & Nowaczyk, S. (2019). Warranty claim rate prediction using logged vehicle data. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 11804, pp. 663–674). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30241-2_55

Lei, Y., et al. (2020). Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 138, 106587.

Man, J., & Zhou, Q. (2018). Prediction of hard failures using stochastic degradation signals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 125, 480–489.

Mashhadi, P. S., et al. (2019). Stacked ensemble of recurrent neural networks for RUL prediction. Applied Sciences.

Parton, M., Fois, A., Vegliò, M., Metta, C., & Gregnanin, M. (2024). Predicting the failure of Component X in the Scania dataset with graph neural networks. In International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (pp. 251–259).

Rengasamy, D., Jafari, M., & Rothwell, B. (2020). Deep learning with dynamically weighted loss function for prognostics and health management. Sensors, 20(3), 723. doi: 10.3390/s20030723

Shah, S., Wilder, B., Perrault, A., & Tambe, M. (2024). Leaving the nest: Going beyond local loss functions for predict-then-optimize. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, pp. 14902–14909).

Xu, D., & Zhang, J. (2026). Risk-aware decision-making for predictive maintenance using distributional reinforcement learning. International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management. doi: 10.1007/s40747-025-02127-w

Yang, Y., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2025). Cost-optimised machine learning model comparison for predictive maintenance. Electronics, 14(12), 2497.

Zhang, Q., Wang, J., & Li, T. (2023). A comprehensive review of cost-sensitive learning in predictive maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 238, 109444. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109444
Section
Posters