Cost-Efficient Prognostics Framework for Heliostat Drive Units

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Dominik Steinberg Stefan Nicolas Huestegge Daniel Maldonado Quinto Marc Roeger Benedikt Koelsch Robert Pitz-Paal

Abstract

In concentrating solar power tower plants, heliostat drive units are critical components, as they control the precise two-axis alignment of thousands of mirrors, so-called heliostats, that focus incoming solar radiation onto a central receiver. Due to the large field sizes and the corresponding long heliostat–tower distances, even small angular deviations in the milliradian range (1 mrad ≈ 0.057 degree) result in significant focal point displacements at the receiver. Consequently, the reliable operation of heliostat drive units is essential for the stable and safe operation of solar tower plants.

However, existing research on heliostat operation and maintenance (O&M) predominantly focuses on optical aspects such as mirror soiling (i.e., the accumulation of dust and sand on reflective surfaces), mirror calibration and tracking algorithms, and the influence of wind loads on heliostat performance and structural behaviour. In contrast, the operational health of heliostat drive units remains largely unexplored. To close this research gap, this study presents a cost-efficient prognostics framework for the recording and the subsequent maintenanceoriented analysis of operational data of the heliostat drive units. For this purpose, an extensive measurement campaign is conducted in the heliostat field of the DLR solar tower research facility in Juelich, Germany. In addition to the existing industrial-grade reference sensors and data loggers at the solar tower research facility in Juelich, this study develops a low-cost Arduino-based data acquisition system and performs a comparison between those conventional and cost-efficient monitoring architectures.


The results demonstrate that the recorded measurement data provide a robust foundation for monitoring the heliostat drive units. The proposed prognostics framework is experimentally validated and successfully applied to selected heliostats in the field: first, this shows that sufficiently precise measurements, adequate sampling rates, and straightforward installation and handling can be achieved for field deployment. Second, it demonstrates the capability to identify and analyse real-world operational anomalies. And third, it enables reliable and costefficient monitoring significantly reducing the barriers to scalable prognostics and health management (PHM) deployment. Although developed for heliostat drive units, the diagnostics and prognostics methodology presented in this work may be transferable to a wide range of electromechanical systems in industrial PHM applications, as it integrates sensors and instrumentation with anomaly detection, and supports conditionbased and predictive maintenance strategies.

 

How to Cite

Steinberg, D., Huestegge, S. N. ., Maldonado Quinto, D. ., Roeger, M., Koelsch, B. ., & Pitz-Paal, R. (2026). Cost-Efficient Prognostics Framework for Heliostat Drive Units. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4955
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

CST, Heliostat Field, Heliostat Drive Units, Prognostics Framework, heliostat failure, arduino, data analysis, outdoor measurement campaign

References
Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M. (2022). On predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, models, and challenges. Applied Sciences, 12(16). doi: 10.3390/app12168081

Alami, A. H., Olabi, A., Mdallal, A., Rezk, A., Radwan, A., Rahman, S. M. A., ... Abdelkareem, M. A. (2023). Concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Status and analysis. International Journal of Thermofluids, 18, 100340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100340

Ali, A., & Abdelhadi, A. (2022). Condition-based monitoring and maintenance: State of the art review. Applied Sciences, 12(2). doi: 10.3390/app12020688

Aoun, A., Ilinca, A., Ghandour, M., & Ibrahim, H. (2021). A review of Industry 4.0 characteristics and challenges, with potential improvements using blockchain technology. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, 107746. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107746

Arduino datasheet. (2026). Arduino GIGA R1 WiFi user manual [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://docs.arduino.cc/resources/datasheets/ABX00063-datasheet.pdf

Ashley, T., Carrizosa, E., & Fernández-Cara, E. (2019). Heliostat field cleaning scheduling for solar power tower plants: A heuristic approach. Applied Energy, 235, 653–660. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.004

Bakhshipour, S., Emes, M. J., & Arjomandi, M. (2026). Local pressure distributions on a heliostat facet and its Strouhal number in turbulent flow. Solar Energy, 307, 114267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.114267

Binali, R., Demirpolat, H., Kuntoğlu, M., Makhesana, M., Yaghoubi, S., & Sayın Kul, B. (2024). A comprehensive review on low-cost MEMS accelerometers for vibration measurement: Types, novel designs, performance evaluation, and applications. Journal of Molecular and Engineering Materials, 12(03), 2430002. doi: 10.1142/S225123732430002X

Blackmon, J. B. (2013). Parametric determination of heliostat minimum cost per unit area. Solar Energy, 97, 342–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.032

Blackmon, J. B. (2014). Heliostat drive unit design considerations: Site wind load effects on projected fatigue life and safety factor. Solar Energy, 105, 170–180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.045

Blume, K., Röger, M., & Pitz-Paal, R. (2023). Full-scale investigation of heliostat aerodynamics through wind and pressure measurements at a pentagonal heliostat. Solar Energy, 251, 337–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.016

Blume, K., Röger, M., Schlichting, T., Macke, A., & Pitz-Paal, R. (2020). Dynamic photogrammetry applied to a real-scale heliostat: Insights into the wind-induced behavior and effects on the optical performance. Solar Energy, 212, 297–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.056

Calabrese, F., Regattieri, A., Bortolini, M., Gamberi, M., & Pilati, F. (2021). Predictive maintenance: A novel framework for a data-driven, semi-supervised, and partially online prognostic health management application in industries. Applied Sciences, 11(8). doi: 10.3390/app11083380

Cannavacciuolo, L., Ferraro, G., Ponsiglione, C., Primario, S., & Quinto, I. (2023). Technological innovation-enabling Industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review. Technovation, 124, 102733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102733

Emes, M., Jafari, A., Pfahl, A., Coventry, J., & Arjomandi, M. (2021). A review of static and dynamic heliostat wind loads. Solar Energy, 225, 60–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.07.014

Failing, J. M., Abellán-Nebot, J. V., Benavent Nácher, S., Rosado Castellano, P., & Romero Subirón, F. (2023). A tool condition monitoring system based on low-cost sensors and an IoT platform for rapid deployment. Processes, 11(3). doi: 10.3390/pr11030668

Göhring, F., Kaufhold, O., Quinto, D. M., Sibum, M., & Wirger, M. (2023). Operational experiences with the heliostat field at the Juelich solar towers. In G. Zhu, M. Röger, & Z. Wang (Eds.), Advances in solar energy: Heliostat systems design, implementation, and operation (Vol. 12671, p. 1267109). SPIE. doi: 10.1117/12.2677417

Griffith, D., Moya, A., Ho, C., & Hunter, P. (2011). Structural dynamics testing and analysis for design evaluation and monitoring of heliostats. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 137. doi: 10.1115/ES2011-54222

Hasibuzzaman, M., Shufian, A., Shefa, R., Raihan, R., Ghosh, J., & Sarker, A. (2020, June). Vibration measurement and analysis using Arduino-based accelerometer. In IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/TENSYMP50017.2020.9230668

Hossain, M. S., Ali Bashir, M. B., & Akter, K. (2026). Design a low-cost solar PV data logger and assess the application and accuracy with off-grid monocrystalline panels. Measurement, 258, 119176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119176

Huang, C., Bu, S., Lee, H. H., Chan, C. H., Kong, S. W., & Yung, W. K. (2024). Prognostics and health management for predictive maintenance: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 75, 78–101.

Ilse, K., Micheli, L., Figgis, B. W., Lange, K., Daßler, D., Hanifi, H., ... Bagdahn, J. (2019). Techno-economic assessment of soiling losses and mitigation strategies for solar power generation. Joule, 3(10), 2303–2321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.019

International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Renewable capacity statistics 2024 (Tech. Rep.). Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Jul/IRENA_Renewable_Energy_Statistics_2024.pdf

Jakobsen, M. O. (2024). Low-cost MEMS accelerometer and microphone-based condition monitoring sensor, with LoRa and Bluetooth Low Energy radio. HardwareX, 18, e00525. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00525

Jundi, Z. S., Al-Waeli, A. H., & Switzner, N. T. (2026). A systematic review of low-cost photovoltaic monitoring systems: Technologies, challenges, and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 226, 116417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116417

Kolok, P., Hodoň, M., Ševčík, P., Hotz, L., & Remy, N. (2025). Low-cost IoT-based predictive maintenance using vibration. Sensors, 25(21). doi: 10.3390/s25216610

Komarizadehasl, S., Mobaraki, B., Ma, H., Lozano-Galant, J.-A., & Turmo, J. (2021). Development of a low-cost system for the accurate measurement of structural vibrations. Sensors, 21(18). doi: 10.3390/s21186191

Kurup, P., Akar, S., Glynn, S., Augustine, C., & Davenport, P. (2022). Cost update: Commercial and advanced heliostat collectors (Tech. Rep. No. NREL/TP-7A40-80482). Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Luo, H., Li, Z., & Xiong, Q. (2021). Study on wind-induced fatigue of heliostat based on artificial neural network. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 217, 104750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104750

Lynch, B., Metghalchi, H., & Levendis, Y. (2025). Concentrating solar thermal power in China: 2025 review and outlook. ASME Open Journal of Engineering, 4, 040807. doi: 10.1115/1.4070013

Moreno-Cruz, I., Paredes-Orta, C., Martell-Chávez, F., & Salgado-Tránsito, I. (2025). Heliostat drift prediction model to improve heliostat position control in solar fields. Solar Energy, 289, 113323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113323

Mykoniatis, K. (2020). A real-time condition monitoring and maintenance management system for low voltage industrial motors using Internet of Things. Procedia Manufacturing, 42, 450–456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.050

Nkinyam, C. M., Ujah, C. O., Asadu, C. O., Anyaka, B., & Olubambi, P. A. (2025). Development of a low-cost monitoring device for solar electric (PV) system using Internet of Things (IoT). Results in Engineering, 28, 107324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107324

Osman, M., & Qureshi, I. (2025). Review of photovoltaic and concentrated solar technologies including their performance, reliability, efficiency and storage. Results in Engineering, 25, 104424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104424

Pargmann, M., Maldonado Quinto, D., Schwarzbözl, P., & Pitz-Paal, R. (2021). High-accuracy data-driven heliostat calibration and state prediction with pretrained deep neural networks. Solar Energy, 218, 48–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.046

Pfahl, A., Coventry, J., Röger, M., Wolfertstetter, F., Vásquez-Arango, J. F., Gross, F., ... Liedke, P. (2017). Progress in heliostat development. Solar Energy, 152, 3–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.029

Pfahl, A., Randt, M., Holze, C., & Unterschütz, S. (2013). Autonomous lightweight heliostat with rim drives. Solar Energy, 92, 230–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.005

Sarver, T., Al-Qaraghuli, A., & Kazmerski, L. L. (2013). A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 698–733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.065

Sattler, J. C., Röger, M., Schwarzbözl, P., Buck, R., Macke, A., Raeder, C., & Göttsche, J. (2020). Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods. Solar Energy, 207, 110–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030

Schnerring, A., Broda, R., Nieslony, M., Algner, N., Saez Martinez, E., Röger, M., ... Pitz-Paal, R. (2026). Airborne real-time solar concentrator orientation estimation for heliostat coarse calibration. Solar Energy, 310, 114495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2026.114495

Schnerring, A., Broda, R., Winter, A., Nieslony, M., Krauth, J. J., Röger, M., ... Pitz-Paal, R. (2025). A simulation environment for UAV-based real-time condition monitoring of solar tower power plants. Solar Energy, 300, 113803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113803

Soto-Ocampo, C. R., Mera, J. M., Cano-Moreno, J. D., & Garcia-Bernardo, J. L. (2020). Low-cost, high-frequency data acquisition system for condition monitoring of rotating machinery through vibration analysis: Case study. Sensors, 20(12). doi: 10.3390/s20123493

Stengler, J., Bülow, M., & Pitz-Paal, R. (2025). Concentrating solar technologies for low-carbon energy. Nature Reviews Clean Technology, 1(10), 719–733. doi: 10.1038/s44359-025-00096-4

STM32H747 datasheet. (2026). STM32H747xI/G datasheet [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/stm32h747ai.pdf

Tian, M., Chidambaranathan, K., Rafique, M. Z. E., Desai, N., Bai, J., Brost, R., ... Yao, Y. (2026). Heliostat optical error inspection with polarimetric imaging drone. Solar Energy, 304, 114185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.114185

Tiboni, M., Remino, C., Bussola, R., & Amici, C. (2022). A review on vibration-based condition monitoring of rotating machinery. Applied Sciences, 12(3). doi: 10.3390/app12030972

Villacorta, J. J., del Val, L., Martínez, R. D., Balmori, J.-A., Magdaleno, Á., López, G., ... Basterra, L.-A. (2021). Design and validation of a scalable, reconfigurable and low-cost structural health monitoring system. Sensors, 21(2), 648. doi: 10.3390/s21020648

Villarroel, A., Zurita, G., & Velarde, R. (2019). Development of a low-cost vibration measurement system for industrial applications. Machines, 7(1). doi: 10.3390/machines7010012

Wette, J., Sutter, F., Enrique-Orts, R., Pérez-García, M., Sánchez-Moreno, R., & Fernández-García, A. (2025). Soiling of solar-field heliostats during operation in concentrating solar thermal plants. Results in Engineering, 28, 107890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107890

Wolfertstetter, F., Fonk, R., Prahl, C., Röger, M., Wilbert, S., & Fernández-Reche, J. (2020). Airborne soiling measurements of entire solar fields with QFly. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2303(1), 100008. doi: 10.1063/5.0028968

Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and health management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108119
Section
Technical Papers