Gated Residual End-of-Life Prediction for Variable-Prefix RUL in the PHME2026 Data Challenge

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Giuseppe Mannone Tim Herrmann Martin Dazer

Abstract

This paper presents a gated residual end-of-life (EOL) method for variable-prefix remaining useful life (RUL) prediction in the PHME 2026 Data Challenge. The task is to estimate the lifetime of partially observed subway-door actuation runs under hidden operating conditions. We frame the problem as EOL estimation: the model first predicts the cycle at which failure occurs and then derives RUL by subtracting the current cycle index. This gives prefixes of different lengths a common lifetime scale. The approach uses engineered prefix features that summarize electrical load, position behavior, shock events, trends, and source-model predictions. Several source models provide an initial EOL prior, while disagreement among them serves as an uncertainty signal. Rather than replacing this prior with one unconstrained predictor, the method refines it through bounded residual corrections. To keep the prediction stable, the method first forms a conservative anchor and calibrates it to the inference setting using released test measurement features. Two bounded specialists then propose residual corrections: one from similar training prefixes and one from shock, position, and current signal evidence. When these specialists disagree, a clipped gate controls how much each correction affects the final EOL estimate. Local diagnostics indicate where the source prior is sufficient, where corrections add value, and where difficult prefixes remain uncertain.

How to Cite

Mannone, G., Herrmann, T., & Dazer, M. (2026). Gated Residual End-of-Life Prediction for Variable-Prefix RUL in the PHME2026 Data Challenge. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4911
Abstract 0 |

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

PHME2026 Data Challenge, End-of-Life Prediction

References
Beirami, H., Calzà, D., Cimatti, A., Islam, M., Roveri, M., & Svaizer, P. (2020). A data-driven approach for RUL prediction of an experimental filtration system. In Proceedings of the European Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 5). doi: 10.36001/phme.2020.v5i1.1318

Eker, O. F., Camci, F., & Jennions, I. K. (2014). A similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life prediction. In Proceedings of the European Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 2). doi: 10.36001/phme.2014.v2i1.1479

Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634

İnce, K., Sirkeci, E., & Genç, Y. (2020). Remaining useful life prediction for experimental filtration system: A data challenge. In Proceedings of the European Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 5). doi: 10.36001/phme.2020.v5i1.1317

Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012

PHME 2026 Organizing Committee. (2026a). Data Challenge. PHME 2026 conference webpage. Retrieved from https://phm-europe.org/data-challenge. Accessed: May 31, 2026.

PHME 2026 Organizing Committee. (2026b). Data Challenge PHME 2026. PHME 2026 challenge handout. Retrieved from https://phm-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/DataChallenge_PHME_2026.pdf. Accessed: May 31, 2026.

Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 1(1). doi: 10.36001/ijphm.2010.v1i1.1336

Shimodaira, H. (2000). Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00115-4

Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation: A review on the statistical data-driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018

Soualhi, M., Nguyen, K. T. P., Medjaher, K., Nejjari, F., Puig, V., Blesa, J., Quevedo, J., & Marlasca, F. (2023). Dealing with prognostics uncertainties: Combination of direct and recursive remaining useful life estimations. Computers in Industry, 144, 103766. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103766

Su, H., & Lee, J. (2024). Machine learning approaches for diagnostics and prognostics of industrial systems using open-source data from PHM data challenges: A review. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 15(2). doi: 10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i2.3993

TV, V., Gupta, P., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., & Shroff, G. (2018). Recurrent neural networks for online remaining useful life estimation in ion mill etching system. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 10). doi: 10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.589

Wolpert, D. H. (1992). Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5(2), 241–259. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1

Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050
Section
Data Challenge Papers