Estimating the Battery State of Health with Quantified Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Joshua Bogaert ingeborg de Pater

Abstract

Batteries are crucial in the transition towards a sustainable society. There is therefore an increased interest in battery health management. In battery health management, one of the key quantities is the State of Health (SoH), i.e., the maximum capacity of a battery, which decreases over time as the battery degrades. Accurate SoH estimations are needed to plan operations and battery replacements. A crucial challenge in SoH estimation is to quantify the uncertainty of the estimates. Two types of uncertainty must be considered. First, aleatoric uncertainty is irreducible and caused by inherent noise in the data. Quantifying this uncertainty gives a lower bound on the SoH. Second, epistemic uncertainty is reducible and is caused by, among other factors, a lack of training data. Epistemic uncertainty can be used to identify if a test sample differs from the training samples, i.e., if it is Out-Of-Distribution (OOD). In this paper, we estimate the SoH during discharge based on the current and voltage measurements obtained during charge. For this, we employ a Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU) neural network with attention. We estimate the aleatoric uncertainty using Simultaneous Quantile Regression (SQR), while we estimate the epistemic uncertainty by applying Orthonormal Certificates (OC). We test our approach on the fast charging dataset of Toyota. We achieve good results with a high accuracy, with a RMSE of only 0.00343 Ampere hours, and a good calibration. The model estimations become less accurate near the End of Life (EoL) of the batteries, but the corresponding data samples are correctly identified as OOD due to the high epistemic uncertainty.

How to Cite

Bogaert, J., & de Pater, ingeborg. (2026). Estimating the Battery State of Health with Quantified Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4905
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

State of Health, Uncertainty quantification, Battery Health Management, Out-of-Distribution Detection, Aleatoric uncertainty, Epistemic uncertainty

References
Cabezas, L., Santos, V. S., Ramos, T. R., & Izbicki, R. (2025). Epistemic uncertainty in conformal scores: A unified approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06995.

De Pater, I., & Mitici, M. (2022). Novel metrics to evaluate probabilistic remaining useful life prognostics with applications to turbofan engines. PHM Society European Conference, 7, 96–109.

dos Reis, G., Strange, C., Yadav, M., & Li, S. (2021). Lithium-ion battery data and where to find it. Energy and AI, 5, 100081.

Ke, Y., Long, M., Yang, F., & Peng, W. (2024). A Bayesian deep learning pipeline for lithium-ion battery SOH estimation with uncertainty quantification. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 40, 406–427.

Ke, Y., Zhou, R., Zhu, R., & Peng, W. (2021). State of health estimation of lithium-ion battery with uncertainty quantification based on Bayesian deep learning. In 2021 3rd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety Engineering (SRSE) (pp. 12–18).

Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143–156.

Nemani, V., Biggio, L., Huan, X., Hu, Z., Fink, O., Tran, A., ... Hu, C. (2023). Uncertainty quantification in machine learning for engineering design and health prognostics: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 205, 110796.

Rasul, M. J., Abbas, A., Baek, J., & Kim, J. (2026). A hybrid ensemble learning framework with uncertainty quantification for state-of-health estimation in lithium-ion batteries. Measurement, 120528.

Roman, D., Saxena, S., Robu, V., Pecht, M., & Flynn, D. (2021). Machine learning pipeline for battery state-of-health estimation. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 447–456.

Severson, K. A., Attia, P. M., Jin, N., Perkins, N., Jiang, B., Yang, Z., ... Braatz, R. D. (2019). Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation. Nature Energy, 4, 383–391.

Tagasovska, N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2019). Single-model uncertainties for deep learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.

Thelen, A., Huan, X., Paulson, N., Onori, S., Hu, Z., & Hu, C. (2024). Probabilistic machine learning for battery health diagnostics and prognostics: Review and perspectives. NPJ Materials Sustainability, 2, 14.

Waltrup, L., Otto-Sobotka, F., Kneib, T., & Kauermann, G. (2015). Expectile and quantile regression: David and Goliath? Statistical Modelling, 15, 433–456.

Xiong, R., Li, L., & Tian, J. (2018). Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on battery state of health monitoring methods. Journal of Power Sources, 405, 18–29.

Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., & Hovy, E. (2016). Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In K. Knight, A. Nenkova, & O. Rambow (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 1480–1489). San Diego, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N16-1174

Zhang, Y., & Li, Y.-F. (2022). Prognostics and health management of lithium-ion battery using deep learning methods: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112282.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, C., Feng, Z., & Xu, Y. (2024). Reliability enhancement of state-of-health assessment model of lithium-ion battery considering the uncertainty with quantile distribution of deep features. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 245, 110002.
Section
Technical Papers