A Framework for the Integration of Hybrid Models in Digital Twin Architectures for PHM

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Jill Mercedes Linneweber Andreas Maximilian Schultz Laura Müller Osarenren Kennedy Aimiyekagbon Iryna Mozgova Walter Sextro

Abstract

Hybrid model structures combine physics-based and machinelearning
(ML) models to leverage complementary strengths
in prognostics and health management (PHM). While both
hybrid modeling and digital twin (DT) architectures are widely
studied, their structural interaction is rarely addressed systematically.
In practice, hybrid models are often developed
application-specifically, and their structural integration into
DT architectures remains weakly formalized.
This paper analyzes hybrid model structures focusing on their
architectural composition and establishes a requirement-driven
configuration framework based on core PHM constraints. Four
hybrid coupling strategies are classified according to their
structural integration principles and positioned within a design
space defined by structural dominance and integration
depth. Based on this configuration framework, architectural
integration requirements for DT environments are derived and
operationalized in a project-specific DT implementation.
The study contributes (1) a structured classification of hybrid
coupling strategies, (2) a requirement-driven configuration
framework for hybrid model structures in PHM contexts,
and (3) a structured integration workflow for embedding
hybrid models into DT architectures. The results provide
a consistent foundation for managing hybrid model structures
within scalable DT environments.

How to Cite

Linneweber, J. M., Schultz, A. M. ., Müller, L., Aimiyekagbon, O. K., Mozgova, I., & Sextro, W. (2026). A Framework for the Integration of Hybrid Models in Digital Twin Architectures for PHM. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4877
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Hybrid Modeling, Digital Twin

References
Boss, B., Malakuti, S., Lin, S.-W., Usländer, T., Clauer, E., Hoffmeister, M., ... Flubacher, B. (2020). Digital twin and asset administration shell concepts and application in the industrial internet and Industrie 4.0. Plattform Industrie, 4, 13–14.

Chen, C., Fu, H., Zheng, Y., Tao, F., & Liu, Y. (2023, December). The advance of digital twin for predictive maintenance: The role and function of machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 581–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.010

Chen, S., Turanoglu Bekar, E., Bokrantz, J., & Skoogh, A. (2025). AI-enhanced digital twins in maintenance: Systematic review, industrial challenges, and bridging research–practice gaps. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 82, 678–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.07.006

Chowdhury, S., Ghosh, A., Acharya, S., Pal, P., Roy, S., & Lahiri, S. (2025). Transforming chemical process engineering: The role of AI and machine learning in revolutionizing process systems. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. doi: 10.1002/cjce.70032

Dierend, H., Altun, O., Mozgova, I., & Lachmayer, R. (2022, September). Management of research field data within the concept of digital twin. In Advances in System-Integrated Intelligence (pp. 205–214). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16281-7_20

Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, & J. Van Leeuwen (Eds.), Multiple Classifier Systems (Vol. 1857, pp. 1–15). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1

Gao, T., Zhu, H., Wu, J., Lu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2024, May). Hybrid physics data-driven model-based fusion framework for machining tool wear prediction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 132(3), 1481–1496. doi: 10.1007/s00170-024-13365-6

Gardner, P., Rogers, T., Lord, C., & Barthorpe, R. (2021, May). Learning model discrepancy: A Gaussian process and sampling-based approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 152, 107381. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107381

Gherghina, I.-S., Bizon, N., Iana, G.-V., & Vasilică, B.-V. (2025). Recent advances in fault detection and analysis of synchronous motors: A review. Machines, 13(9). doi: 10.3390/machines13090815

Gupta, H., & Kundu, P. (2024, June). Digital twin development for feed drive systems condition monitoring and maintenance planning. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 4. doi: 10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.3952

Ifeanyi, A., & Coble, J. (2025, June). Enhancing system-level prognostics with structural information: A graph-based approach. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM) (pp. 1–8). doi: 10.1109/ICPHM65385.2025.11061821

Jacob, B., & Santhosh Kumar, G. (2025). Towards artifacts-based behavior modeling of cyber-physical systems for building digital twins. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics, ICCAR (pp. 574–579). doi: 10.1109/ICCAR64901.2025.11073032

Kareem, A., Domingo, D., & Hur, J.-W. (2025). A hybrid IoT-based framework for real-time parameter estimation and predictive maintenance in hydraulic excavators. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2025.3605642

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021, May). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Krespach, V., Blum, N., Pottmann, M., Rehfeldt, S., & Klein, H. (2025, March). Improving extrapolation capabilities of a data-driven prediction model for control of an air separation unit. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 194, 108953. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108953

Lenzi, A., Bessac, J., Rudi, J., & Stein, M. L. (2023, September). Neural networks for parameter estimation in intractable models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 185, 107762. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107762

Ma, J., Luo, C., Li, K., Bai, M., Dong, S., & Yin, L. (2025, October). Leveraging hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven modeling techniques for complex contact/impact phenomena. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 214, 106122. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2025.106122

Mayr, S., Gross, T., Krenn, S., Kunze, W., & Zehetner, C. (2024, January). Digital twin-based predictive maintenance for sheet metal bending. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 504–512. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.050

Najafzadeh, M., & Yeganeh, A. (2025). AI-driven digital twins in industrialized offsite construction: A systematic review. Buildings, 15(17), 2997.

Patel, R. S., Bhartiya, S., & Gudi, R. D. (2022, January). Physics constrained learning in neural network-based modeling. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(7), 79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.425

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019, February). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

Rajkolhe, R. V., Bhagwat, D. S. S., & Deshmukh, D. P. V. (2025, June). Dynamic weighted ensemble model for predictive optimization in green sand casting: Advancing Industry 4.0 manufacturing. MethodsX, 14, 103393. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103393

Rofatto, V. F., Almeida, L. F. R. D., Matsuoka, M. T., Klein, I., Veronez, M. R., & Da Silveira, L. G. (2026, January). Residual-based neural network for unmodeled distortions in 2D coordinate transformation. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 17(1), 104–119. doi: 10.1016/j.geog.2025.06.005

Şahin, T., Wolff, D., von Danwitz, M., & Popp, A. (2024). Towards a hybrid digital twin: Fusing sensor information and physics in surrogate modeling of a reinforced concrete beam. doi: 10.1109/SDF63218.2024.10773885

Stark, R., Anderl, R., Thoben, K.-D., & Wartzack, S. (2020). WiGeP-Positionspapier: “Digitaler Zwilling”. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 115(s1), 47–50.

Tao, F., Qi, Q., Wang, L., & Nee, A. (2019). Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering, 5(4), 653–661.

Von Krannichfeldt, L., Orehounig, K., & Fink, O. (2025, August). Combining physics-based and data-driven modeling for building energy systems. Applied Energy, 391, 125853. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125853

Von Rueden, L., Mayer, S., Sifa, R., Bauckhage, C., & Garcke, J. (2020). Combining machine learning and simulation to a hybrid modelling approach: Current and future directions. In M. R. Berthold, A. Feelders, & G. Krempl (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XVIII (Vol. 12080, pp. 548–560). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44584-3_43

Von Stosch, M., Oliveira, R., Peres, J., & Feyo De Azevedo, S. (2014, January). Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 60, 86–101. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.008

Wohlleben, M., Bender, A., Peitz, S., & Sextro, W. (2022). Development of a hybrid modeling methodology for oscillating systems with friction. In G. Nicosia et al. (Eds.), Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science (Vol. 13164, pp. 101–115). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-95470-3_8

Wohlleben, M., Röder, B., Ebel, H., Muth, L., Sextro, W., & Eberhard, P. (2024, August). Hybrid modeling of multibody systems: Comparison of two discrepancy models for trajectory prediction. PAMM, 24(2), e202400027. doi: 10.1002/pamm.202400027

Zachariades, C., & Xavier, V. (2025). A review of artificial intelligence techniques in fault diagnosis of electric machines. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 25(16), 5128.

Zhou, Z.-H. (2012). Ensemble methods: Foundations and algorithms. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/b12207
Section
Technical Papers