Evaluating the Impact of Data Partitioning and Client Selection on Federated Remaining Useful Life Prediction in Aviation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Faruk Ozdemir Roy S. Kalawsky
Mohammed M. Mabkhot

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly explored for Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction in aviation, motivated by the distributed nature of operational data across operators and platforms, the need to learn from heterogeneous fleet conditions, and the requirement to preserve data ownership and intellectual property by avoiding raw data sharing. While existing studies report promising results, they rely on subjectively defined benchmarking setups, where non-Independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) data partitioning, client selection, and comparison criteria are selected without systematic examination of the bias they may introduce. Consequently, it remains unclear whether reported performance differences arise from the learning method itself or from unexamined configuration choices. This paper investigates the bias induced by data partitioning and client selection configurations in FL for aviation RUL prediction. Representative heterogeneity and client selection scenarios, including operating-condition shift, are evaluated under systematic learning settings to isolate their effect on model outcomes. The results show that both partitioning and selection choices can materially influence reported performance independent of the underlying model, demonstrating that selection bias alone can alter fleet-level RUL estimates. These findings highlight the need for harmonised and well-grounded benchmarking practices to support objective comparison and credible evaluation of FL approaches in aviation applications.

How to Cite

Ozdemir, F., Kalawsky, R. S., & Mabkhot, M. M. (2026). Evaluating the Impact of Data Partitioning and Client Selection on Federated Remaining Useful Life Prediction in Aviation. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4866
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Federated Learning, Remaining Useful Life, Data Partitioning, Client Selection, Aviation, Prognostics and Health Management

References
Boujamza, A., & Lissane Elhaq, S. (2022). Attention-based LSTM for remaining useful life estimation of aircraft engines. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(12), 450–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.353

Cho, Y. J., Wang, J., & Joshi, G. (2020). Client selection in federated learning: Convergence analysis and power-of-choice selection strategies.

Dalgkitsis, A., Koufakis, A., Stutterheim, J., Mifsud, A., Atwani, P., Gommans, L., De Laat, C., Papagianni, C., & Oprescu, A. (2024). Secure collaborative model training with dynamic federated learning in multi-domain environments. In Proceedings of SC 2024-W: Workshops of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (pp. 755–759). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCW63240.2024.00107

Dhada, M., Jain, A. K., Herrera, M., Perez Hernandez, M., & Parlikad, A. K. (2020). Secure and communications-efficient collaborative prognosis. IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing, 2(4), 164–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cim.2020.0035

Du, N. H., Long, N. H., Ha, K. N., Hoang, N. V., Huong, T. T., & Tran, K. P. (2023). Trans-Lighter: A lightweight federated learning-based architecture for remaining useful lifetime prediction. Computers in Industry, 148, 103888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103888

European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2023). Artificial intelligence roadmap 2.0.

Fu, L., Zhang, H., Gao, G., Zhang, M., & Liu, X. (2023). Client selection in federated learning: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(24), 21811–21819. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3299573

Fu, S., & Avdelidis, N. P. (2023). Prognostic and health management of critical aircraft systems and components: An overview. Sensors, 23(19). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198124

Jeong, C., Yue, X., & Chung, S. (2026). Fed-Joint: Joint modeling of nonlinear degradation signals and failure events for remaining useful life prediction using federated learning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 267, 111833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111833

Kabashkin, I. (2024). Integration of foundation models and federated learning in AIoT-based aircraft health monitoring systems. Mathematics, 12(21). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213428

Kabashkin, I. (2025). Framework for addressing imbalanced data in aviation with federated learning. Information, 16(2), 147. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020147

Kamei, S., & Taghipour, S. (2023). A comparison study of centralized and decentralized federated learning approaches utilizing the transformer architecture for estimating remaining useful life. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 233, 109130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109130

Kim, N.-H., Dawn, A., & Joo-Ho, C. (2017). Prognostics and health management of engineering systems. Springer International Publishing.

Landau, D., de Pater, I., Mitici, M., & Saurabh, N. (2026). Federated learning framework for collaborative remaining useful life prognostics: An aircraft engine case study. Future Generation Computer Systems, 174, 107945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.107945

Lee, J., & Mitici, M. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning for predictive aircraft maintenance using probabilistic remaining useful life prognostics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 230, 108908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108908

Li, J., Chen, T., & Teng, S. (2024). A comprehensive survey on client selection strategies in federated learning. Computer Networks, 251, 110663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110663

Li, X., Zhang, W., Li, X., & Hao, H. (2024). Partial domain adaptation in remaining useful life prediction with incomplete target data. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 29(3), 1903–1913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2023.3325538

Listou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 183, 240–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027

Llasag Rosero, R., Silva, C., Ribeiro, B., Albisser, M., Brutsche, M., & Arias Chao, M. (2025). Label synchronization strategies for hybrid federated learning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 256, 110751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110751

Mabkhot, M. M., Kalawsky, R. S., & Liaqat, A. (2025). Introducing the Manufacturing Digital Passport (MDP): A new concept for realising digital thread data sharing in aerospace and complex manufacturing. Systems, 13(8), 700. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080700

Nishio, T., & Yonetani, R. (2019). Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge. In ICC 2019: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2019.8761315

Raouf, I., Kumar, P., Cheon, Y., Tanveer, M., Jo, S.-H., & Kim, H. S. (2025). Advances in prognostics and health management for aircraft landing gear: Progress, challenges, and future possibilities. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 12(1), 301–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-024-00646-4

Sharma, R. K. (2024). Framework based on machine learning approach for prediction of the remaining useful life: A case study of an aviation engine. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 24(3), 1333–1350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-024-01922-w

Smestad, C., & Li, J. (2023). A systematic literature review on client selection in federated learning. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593438

Soltani, B., Haghighi, V., Mahmood, A., Sheng, Q. Z., & Yao, L. (2022). A survey on participant selection for federated learning in mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture (MobiArch 2022) (pp. 19–24). doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3556548.3559633

Stanton, I., Munir, K., Ikram, A., & El-Bakry, M. (2023). Predictive maintenance analytics and implementation for aircraft: Challenges and opportunities. Systems Engineering, 26(2), 216–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21651

Vermelin, W. S., Mishra, M., Eng, M. P., Andersson, D., & Kyprianidis, K. (2024). Collaborative training of data-driven remaining useful life prediction models using federated learning. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 15(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i2.3821

Zhang, J., Wang, P., Yan, R., & Gao, R. X. (2018). Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 78–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.011
Section
Technical Papers