Model-Based Loads Observer Approach for Landing Gear Remaining Useful Life Prediction

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Jonathan Jobmann Frank Thielecke

Abstract

Implementing health monitoring methods for aircraft landing gears holds the potential to prevent premature component replacements and optimize maintenance scheduling. Therefore, this paper introduces a fundamental framework for fatigue monitoring and subsequent steps for predicting the remaining useful life of landing gears. A key component of this framework is the model-based load observer, which lays the groundwork for subsequent remaining useful life prediction steps. This load observer will be analysed in detail in this paper. The model-based approach is specifically designed for observing the loads on civil aircraft landing gears during touchdown, utilizing signals from in-service sensors. To evaluate the load observation method, a flexible multibody simulation model is introduced to generate synthetic data sets of aircraft in-service data and the corresponding landing gear loads, given the unavailability of real in-service and recorded landing gear load data. The load observation method is applied to synthetic in-service data across various virtually performed landing scenarios, offering a proof of concept along with extensive analysis of parameter uncertainties and additional factors influencing observation quality. Through this analysis, certain challenges to the observation method are identified that require further investigation in subsequent research efforts.

How to Cite

Jobmann, J., & Thielecke, F. (2024). Model-Based Loads Observer Approach for Landing Gear Remaining Useful Life Prediction. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4104
Abstract 134 | PDF Downloads 88

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

loads observer, landing gear, loads monitoring, remaining useful life, fatigue, health monitoring

References
Blundell, M., & Harty, D. (2004). Multibody systems approach to vehicle dynamics. Amsterdam: Elsevier ButterworthHeinemann. Boller, C., & Buderath, M. (2007). Fatigue in aerostructures — where structural health monitoring can contribute to a complex subject. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 561–587. doi:

of landing gear. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2022.896877 European Union Aviation Safety Agency. (2020). Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large aeroplanes cs-25: Amendment 26. GUYAN, R. J. (1965). Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA Journal, 3(2), 380. doi: 10.2514/3.2874 Holmes, G., Sartor, P., Reed, S., Southern, P., Worden, K., & Cross, E. (2016). Prediction of landing gear loads using machine learning techniques. Structural Health Monitoring, 15(5), 568–582. doi:

10.1177/1475921716651809

Jeong, S. H., Lee, K. B., Ham, J. H., Kim, J. H., & Cho, J. Y.

10.1098/rsta.2006.1924

Boller, C., & Staszewski, W. J. (2004). Aicraft structural health and usage monitoring. In W. J. Staszewski,

C. Boller, & G. R. Tomlinson (Eds.), Health monitoring of aerospace structures. Chichester: John Wiley. Buderath, M. (2009). Fatigue monitoring in military fixedwing aircraft. In C. Boller, F.-K. Chang, & Y. Fujino (Eds.), Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Chichester: Wiley.

Buderath, M., & Neumair, M. (2007). Operational risk assessment for unmanned aircraft vehicles by using structural health and event management. UAV Design Processes / Design Criteria for Structures, 2.1-1 – 2.1-10. Chabod, A. (2022). Digital twin for fatigue analysis.

Procedia Structural Integrity, 38, 382–392. doi:

(2020). Estimation of maximum strains and loads in aircraft landing using artificial neural network. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 21(1), 117–132. doi: 10.1007/s42405-019-00204-2 JIAO, R., HE, X., & LI, Y. (2018). Individual aircraft life monitoring: An engineering approach for fatigue damage evaluation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 31(4), 727–739. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.02.002 Lee, Y.-L., & Barkey, M. E. (2012). Stress-based multiaxial fatigue analysis. In Y.-L. Lee, M. E. Barkey, & H.-T. Kang (Eds.), Metal fatigue analysis handbook. Waltham, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Luderer, O., & Thielecke, F. (2022). Validation of a hybrid loads observer for a subscale test aircraft with distributed electric propulsion. 33rd Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences ICAS. Montel, M., & Thielecke, F. (2018). Validation of a hybrid observer method for flight loads estimation. 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2018.

10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.039

SAE International. (2020). Landing gear fatigue spectrum development for part 25 aircraft: Air 5914. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: Author. doi: 10.4271/AIR5914 Schijve, J. (2009). Fatigue of structures and materials (Second edition ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.

Dziendzikowski, M., Kurnyta, A., Reymer, P., Kurdelski, M., Klysz, S., Leski, A., & Dragan, K. (2021). Application of operational load monitoring system for fatigue estimation of main landing gear attachment frame of an aircraft. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(21). doi:

Schmidt, R. K. (2021). The design of aircraft landing gear.

10.3390/ma14216564

SAE International. doi: 10.4271/9780768099430 Schmidt, R. K., & Sartor, P. (2009). Landing gear. In C. Boller, F.-K. Chang, & Y. Fujino (Eds.), Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Chichester: Wiley.

El Mir, H., & Perinpanayagam, S. (2021). Certification approach for physics informed machine learning and its application in landing gear life assessment. In 2021 ieee/aiaa 40th digital avionics systems conference (dasc) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. doi:

Stolz, C., & Neumair, M. (2008). Structural integrity management system for enhanced aircraft availability. Future Airframe Structural Lifing: Methods, Applications and Management, 24-1 - 24-12. 10.1109/DASC52595.2021.9594374

El Mir, H., & Perinpanayagam, S. (2022). Certification of machine learning algorithms for safe-life assessment

Tinga, T. (2010). Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95(10), 1061–1075. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.04.015
Section
Posters