Characterizing Damage in Wind Turbine Mooring Using a Data-Driven Predictor Model within a Particle Filtering Estimation Framework

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 27, 2024
Rohit Kumar
Ananay Thakur Shereena O A Arvind Keprate
Subhamoy Sen

Abstract

Floating Offshore Wind Turbines (FOWT) represent a promising solution to renewable energy challenges, yet effective maintenance remains critical for cost management. Traditional machine learning (ML) approaches for detecting FOWT damage often rely on extensive real-world data, which can be impractical and economically unfeasible. Alternatively, stochastic filtering-based time-domain approaches leverage physical understanding through dynamic models, typically finite element models. However, these methods are hindered by excessive simulation calls within the recursive filtering frameworks. This study proposes a novel filtering-based approach that replaces the computationally intensive process model with a Deep Neural Network (DNN) surrogate, addressing the aforementioned limitations. The proposed approach utilizes synthetic data generated from the high-fidelity calibrated OpenFAST model of FOWT dynamics to train a DNN toward learning the dynamic evolution of the FOWT conditioned on the current health state. By offering a computationally efficient representation of system dynamics conditioned on health state, this approach allows for real-time damage detection and interpretable information on damage severity within a stochastic inverse estimation framework, specifically employing Particle Filtering in this study. This approach contrasts with traditional black-box ML-based methods, which typically struggle to provide interpretable information on damage characteristics. Extensive numerical investigations on damaged FOWT mooring lines demonstrate this approach's practical applicability and superiority over traditional ML-based methods. Eventually, integrating explainable ML models within the filtering framework induces promptness in detection without sacrificing transparency.

How to Cite

Kumar, R., Thakur, A., O A, S., Keprate, A., & Sen, S. (2024). Characterizing Damage in Wind Turbine Mooring Using a Data-Driven Predictor Model within a Particle Filtering Estimation Framework. PHM Society European Conference, 8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4051
Abstract 12 | PDF Downloads 12

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Floating offshore wind turbine, Particle filtering, Deep neural network, Parameter estimation

References
Altuzarra, J., Herrera, A., Mat´ıas, O., Urbano, J., Romero, C., Wang, S., & Guedes Soares, C. (2022). Mooring system transport and installation logistics for a floating offshore wind farm in lannion, france. Journal of marine science and engineering, 10(10), 1354. Aqdam, H. R., Ettefagh, M. M., & Hassannejad, R. (2018). Health monitoring of mooring lines in floating struc-

tures using artificial neural networks. Ocean Engineering, 164, 284–297. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., & Kiranyaz, S. (2022). An overview of deep learning methods used in vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering. In Dynamics of civil structures, volume 2: Proceedings of the 39th imac, a conference and exposition on structural dynamics 2021 (pp. 93–98). Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A. D., & Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors, 20(10), 2778. Choe, D.-E., Kim, H.-C., & Kim, M.-H. (2021). Sequencebased modeling of deep learning with lstm and gru networks for structural damage detection of floating offshore wind turbine blades. Renewable Energy, 174, 218–235. Farrar, C. R., Doebling, S. W., & Nix, D. A. (2001). Vibration–based structural damage identification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 359(1778), 131–149. Gorostidi, N., Pardo, D., & Nava, V. (2023). Diagnosis of the health status of mooring systems for floating offshore wind turbines using autoencoders. Ocean Engineering, 287, 115862. Jamalkia, A., Ettefagh, M. M., & Mojtahedi, A. (2016). Damage detection of tlp and spar floating wind turbine using dynamic response of the structure. Ocean Engineering, 125, 191–202. Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., & Scott, G. (2009, 2). Definition of a 5-mw reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Retrieved from https://www.osti.gov/biblio/947422 doi: 10.2172/947422 Li, Y., Le, C., Ding, H., Zhang, P., & Zhang, J. (2019). Dynamic response for a submerged floating offshore wind turbine with different mooring configurations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(4), 115. Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022). Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and highdimensional data source highlights. Structural Health Monitoring, 21(4), 1906–1955. Regan, T., Beale, C., & Inalpolat, M. (2017). Wind turbine blade damage detection using supervised machine learning algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 139(6), 061010. Robertson, A., Jonkman, J., Masciola, M., Song, H., Goupee, A., Coulling, A., & Luan, C. (2014). Definition of the semisubmersible floating system for phase ii of oc4 (Tech. Rep.). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States). Wang, P., Tian, X., Peng, T., & Luo, Y. (2018). A review of the state-of-the-art developments in the field monitoring of offshore structures. Ocean Engineering, 147,
Section
Technical Papers