Model Based Approach to Zonal Safety Analysis

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Rachael Henderson Ghulam Hussain Jacek Stecki

Abstract

Zonal Safety Analysis (ZSA) is an analysis technique for assessing the safety of complex systems however current tools limit its repeatability, thoroughness and time efficiency. The model based method proposed in this paper remedies these limitations.
Zonal Safety Analysis is widely used in the aerospace industry with similar analysis techniques also seen in the design of offshore oil & gas systems, mining equipment, defence platforms and other high-risk systems. The importance of ZSA comes from its ability to allow the designer to analyse the spread of hazards through the system from a physical standpoint. This is done by dividing the system into zones and understanding how hazardous forms of energy or material (e.g. fire or oil) could spread between these zones. This paper suggests a method for tracking the spread of hazards using a model of the system that can automatically generate the potential propagation of the hazards. To give the designer a better understanding of the source of the hazard, and greater flexibility in preventing it from occurring, the causes of these hazards are also defined in the model. Using a model based approach allows the analysis process to be efficiently repeated for a design variant at any stage in the product lifecycle by updating the structure (i.e. different components/configuration) or parameters (i.e. hazard causes, criticality) of the system model.

How to Cite

Henderson, R., Hussain, G., & Stecki, J. (2016). Model Based Approach to Zonal Safety Analysis. PHM Society European Conference, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1601
Abstract 106 | PDF Downloads 73

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Zonal Safety Analysis Hazards Barriers

References
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (2003). ATA MSG-3. Air Transport Association of American, Inc. Washington, DC: Air Transport Association of American, Inc. Retrieved March 28, 2015
Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2013, June 27). Investigation: AO-2010-089 - In-flight uncontained engine failure Airbus A380-842, VH-OQA, overhead Batam Island, Indonesia, 4 November 2010. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from Australian Transport Safety Bureau: http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2010/aair/ao-2010-089.aspx
de Bruin, M., & Swuste, P. (2008, February). Analysis of hazard scenarios for a research environment in an oil and gas exploration and production company. Safety Science, 46(2), 261-271.
Dharmavaram, S., & Klein, J. A. (2012, September). An introduction to assessing process hazards. Process Safety Progress, 31(1), 266-270. doi:10.1002/prs.11495
Gruhn, P. E., & Cheddie, H. (2006). Safety Instrumented Systems - Design, Analysis, and Justification (2nd ed.). ISA. Retrieved April 22, 2015
Hollnagel, E. (1999). Accidents and barriers. Proceedings of Lex Valenciennes, 28, pp. 175-182. Retrieved July 5, 2015
Löwe, K., & Kariuki, S. G. (2007, December). Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92(12), 1764-1773.
PHM Technology. (2015). MADe.
SAE International. (1996, December 1). ARP4761. SAE International. Retrieved February 13, 2015
Section
Technical Papers