Aligning PHM, SHM and CBM by understanding the physical system failure behaviour



Published Jul 8, 2014
Tiedo Tinga Richard Loendersloot


In this work the three disciplines of condition based maintenance (CBM), structural health monitoring (SHM) and prognostics and health management (PHM) are described. Then the characteristics of the disciplines are compared, which leads to a clear insight in the commonalities, but also in the difference in objectives and scope of the three disciplines. The disciplines are then demonstrated using three different case studies on bearing vibration monitoring, composite panel structural health monitoring and helicopter landing gear prognostics, respectively. After a discussion on the benefits of understanding the system physical (failure) behaviour, an integrated approach is proposed in which the three disciplines are aligned. This approach starts from defining an appropriate monitoring strategy (SHM and CM) and eventually ends in supporting the decision making (PHM) that leads to an optimal maintenance process throughout the life cycle of the asset.

How to Cite

Tinga, T., & Loendersloot, R. (2014). Aligning PHM, SHM and CBM by understanding the physical system failure behaviour. PHM Society European Conference, 2(1).
Abstract 593 | PDF Downloads 365



physics of failure, monitoring, predictive maintenance

Banks, J. C., Reichard, K. M., Hines, J. A., & Brought, M. S. (2008). Platform degrader analysis for the design and development of vehicle health management systems. Paper presented at the International conference on prognostics and health management.
Brown, E. R., McCollom, N. N., Moore, E. E., & Hess, A. (2007). Prognostics and health management. A data-driven approach to suporting the F-35 Lightning II. Paper presented at the IEEE
Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana.
Buderath, M., & Adhikari, P. P. (2012). Simulation framework and certification guidance for condition monitoring and prognostic health management. Paper presented at the European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Berlin.
Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2010). An introduction to Structural Health Monitoring. In A. Deraemaeker (Ed.), New Trends in Vibration Based Structural Health Monitoring. Udine: CISM. ISO. (2012). ISO 13374 - Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines ISO.
Loendersloot, R., Ooijevaar, T. H., Warnet, L., Boer, A. d., & Akkerman, R. (2011). Vibration Based Structural Health Monitoring and the Modal Strain Energy Damage Index Algorithm Applied to a
Composite T–Beam. In C. M. A. Vasques & J. D.
Rodrigues (Eds.), Vibration and Structural Acoustics Analysis: Current Research and Related Technologies. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands. MIMOSA. (2013). Open System Architecture for Condition-Based Maintenance, V3.3.1 MIMOSA.
Ooijevaar, T. H., Loendersloot, R., Warnet, L., Boer, A. d., & Akkerman, R. (2010). Vibration Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Composite T–Beam. Composite Structures, 92(9), 2007-2015.
Ooijevaar, T. H., Warnet, L., Loendersloot, R., Akkerman, R., & Boer, A. d. (2012). Vibration Based Damage Identification in a Composite T-Beam Utilising Low Cost Integrated Actuators and Sensors. Paper presented at the Sixth European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Orsagh, R., Roemer, M. J., Sheldon, J., & Klenke, C. J. (2004). A comprehensive prognostic approach for predicting gas turbine engine bearing life. Paper presented at the IGTI Turbo Expo, Vienna.
Rao, B. K. N. (1996). Handbook of condition monitoring. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Roemer, M. J., Byington, C. S., Kacprzynski, G. J., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2006). An overview of selected prognostic technologies with application to engine health management. Paper presented at the ASME Turbo Expo, Barcelona, Spain.
SAE. (2013). Guidelines for Implementation of Structural Health Monitoring on Fixed Wing Aircraft (Vol. ARP 6461). Warrendale: SAE.
Sanchez Ramirez, A., Loendersloot, R., & Tinga, T. (2014). Vibration based blind identification of bearing failures for autonomous wireless sensor nodes. Paper presented at the 2nd European conference of the prognostics and health management society Nantes, France.
Stubbs, N., & Farrar, C. R. (1995). Field verification of a nondestructive damage localization and severity estimation algorithm. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Modal
Analysis Conference.
Tinga, T. (2010). Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 95(10), 1061-1075.
Tinga, T. (2013). Predictive maintenance of military systems based on physical failure models. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 33, 295-300. doi: 10.3303/CET1333050
Technical Papers