The “Last Mile” of PHM: A Verifiable Claim Architecture for Deterministic Airworthiness Compliance Assessment

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 28, 2026
Simon Trussler Ralph Poole Ken Percell Frank Zahiri

Abstract

To accelerate the exhaustive process of military airworthiness certification, this paper introduces a deterministic, Natural Language Processing driven workflow that establishes a Verifiable Claim Architecture (VCA). While PHM strategies successfully detect anomalies and predict subsystem failures, mapping these low-level engineering findings to high-level regulatory mandates remains a massive documentation bottleneck. The proposed VCA automates evidence discovery by integrating multi-format layout parsing and reproducible Boolean filtering to establish a highly structured, auditable evidence layer. Large Language Models are then deployed strictly as constrained text-synthesis engines, operating within isolated context windows to populate formal compliance matrices.

To fundamentally eliminate textual hallucination and abstractive drift, a provenance audit layer anchors every generated narrative block to an unalterable source document metadata tag. Furthermore, the architecture integrates system safety ontologies to automatically map engineering deviations to standardized Risk Assessment Codes (RAC) and operational flight restrictions in accordance with MIL-STD-882E. Evaluated by the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center against 7,346 pages of compliance artifacts across multiple aircraft platforms, the framework demonstrated a highly conservative safety posture, properly deferring policy exceptions to human engineers. By reducing expert administrative labor hours by an estimated 50% and compressing certification schedules from 18–36 months down to 6–12 months, this domain-agnostic framework effectively streamlines the compliance lifecycle, ensuring human experts remain focused entirely on authoritative, high-consequence risk assessment.

How to Cite

Trussler, S. ., Poole, . R. ., Percell, K. ., & Zahiri, F. . (2026). The “Last Mile” of PHM:: A Verifiable Claim Architecture for Deterministic Airworthiness Compliance Assessment. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2026.v18i1.5089
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

airworthiness, Airworthiness Compliance Assessment, Verifiable Claim Architecture, Technical Language Processing, Certification, aviation

References
Alansari, A., & Luqman, H. (2026). Large language models hallucination: A comprehensive survey. Computer Science Review, 61, 100970.
Cejas, O. A., Azeem, M. I., Abualhaija, S., & Briand, L. C. (2023). Nlp-based automated compliance checking of data processing agreements against gdpr. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49(9), 4282-4303.
Fu, S., & Avdelidis, N. P. (2023). Prognostic and health management of critical aircraft systems and components: An overview. Sensors, 23(19), Article 8124.
King, J. C. (2021). Using model based system engineering to identify safety critical functions in airworthiness certifications (Publication No. AFITENVMS21M241) [Master's thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology]. Defense Technical Information Center.
Lorenzo, W. P., & Takahashi, T. T. (2024). Can We Fly it? Yes We Can: A Comparative Study of Military Airworthiness and Flight Operations. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum (p. 2213).
Löwenmark, K., Taal, C., Schnabel, S., Liwicki, M., & Sandin, F. (2022). Technical Language Supervision for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis in Process Industry. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 13(2).
Onilede, M. O. (2026). Designing an audit-safe analytics architecture for aircraft maintenance decision support in regulated aviation environments. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 1-11.
Pavlyuk, D., & Alomar, I. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Aircraft Maintenance: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 17(1).
Trilla, A., Mijatovic, N., & Vilasis-Cardona, X. (2022). Towards learning causal representations of technical word embeddings for smart troubleshooting. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 13(2).
Weiss, B. A., & Brundage, M. P. (2021). Measurement and evaluation for prognostics and health management (phm) for manufacturing operations–summary of an interactive workshop highlighting phm trends. International journal of prognostics and health management, 12(1), 10-36001.
Zhang, Q., Liu, J., & Chen, X. (2024). A literature review of the digital thread: Definition, key technologies, and applications. Systems, 12(3), 70.
Section
Technical Research Papers