FE-Based Data Generation for Structural Integrity Verification with Neural Networks
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The application of deep learning within Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) frameworks offers immense potential for real-time structural health monitoring. However, in high-consequence applications such as high-velocity collisions, algorithmic deployment is severely bottlenecked by a fundamental scarcity of training data. Because destructive physical testing is prohibitively expensive and real-world incident telemetry is rare, acquiring the massive, diverse datasets required to prevent neural network overfitting remains a critical operational challenge. To overcome this data scarcity, this paper presents a scalable methodology that transforms high-fidelity Finite Element (FE) analysis into an automated Physics-of-Failure "data engine". Using the safety-critical underrun guard of a high-speed intercity train as a primary case study, constructing a complete Digital Thread that bridges quantitative continuum mechanics with qualitative human operational logic.
To prevent the curse of dimensionality during automated data generation, this framework implements rigorous physical and algorithmic boundaries. Complex multi-body impact kinematics are mathematically distilled, and six non-linear material parameters are algorithmically condensed into a singular "toughness" variable to honor the physical inverse correlation between material strength and ductility. Utilizing a low-discrepancy Sobol sequence, the simulation parameters, are sampled uniformly with 256 transient-dynamic simulations, ensuring the highly sensitive boundary transitions of structural failure are densely captured without statistical clustering.
To simulate real-world hardware constraints, a virtual sensor network of accelerometers and strain gauges is deployed. Multi-axial strain tensors are mathematically reduced to Von Mises scalar invariants, optimizing the AI input layer and preventing feature bloat. Concurrently, standardized multi-angle visual renderings of the deformed FE mesh are generated, enabling domain experts to label the physical damage into discrete, actionable operation and maintenance directives (continue operation, reduced operation, immediate operational stop and reuse, repair, exchange).
Following the experimental validation of the digital twin against physical destructive laboratory tests, the resulting synthetic dataset was utilized to train a baseline classification neural network. Despite the severely constrained sample size ($n = 256$), the diagnostic AI achieved an outstanding predictive accuracy of 82 \%. This confirms that mathematically optimized, physics-grounded data generation can successfully bridge the data gap in modern PHM frameworks, providing a robust pathway for real-time diagnostic deployment.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
FE-Based Data Generation, Prognostics and Health Management, Structural Health Monitoring, Deep Learning, Physics-of-Failure, Digital Twin, High-Velocity Collisions, Structural Integrity Verification, Sobol Sequence, Curse of Dimensionality, Virtual Sensor Network, Non-linear Material Behavior, Synthetic Training Data, Predictive Diagnostics
way blockage Oberhausen-Emmerich). https://
www.24rhein.de/assets/images/34/539/
34539698 -ice -zug -2sVrJNjiNM73 .jpg.
(Accessed: 2026-05-28. Image from article:
https :// www .24rhein .de / leben -im
-westen / verkehr / ausfaelle -busse
-ersatz -oepnv -bahnsperrung -deutsche
-bahn-oberhausen-emmerich-nrw-ice-re
-93062986.html)
Agnew, S. R., & Duygulu, O. (2005). Statistical evaluation
of mechanical property variability in structural alloys.
Materials Science and Engineering: A, 407(1-2), 29–
37.
Akrim, A., Gogu, C., Vingerhoeds, R., & Sala¨un,
M. (2023). Self-supervised learning for data
scarcity in a fatigue damage prognostic problem.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,
120, 105837. Retrieved from https :// www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S0952197623000210 doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105837
Altair Engineering Inc. (2023). Altair radioss theory manual
[Computer software manual]. Troy, Michigan, USA.
(Material Laws: Elasto-plasticity and Failure Criteria)
Avevor, J., Adeniyi, M., Enyejo, L., & Aikins, S. (2024,
08). Machine learning-driven predictive modeling for
frp strengthened structural elements: A review of ai-
based damage detection, fatigue prediction, and struc-
tural health monitoring. International Journal of Sci-
entific Research and Modern Technology, 3, 1-20. doi:
10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i8.420
Bratley, P., & Fox, B. L. (1988). Algorithm 659: Im-
plementing sobol’s quasirandom sequence generator.
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 14(1),
88–100.
Chopin, N. (2004). Central limit theorem for sequential
monte carlo methods and its application to bayesian in-
ference. The Annals of Statistics, 32(6), 2385–2411.
doi: 10.1214/009053604000000698
DIN EN 15227: Railway applications - Crashworthiness
requirements for railway vehicle bodies (Bahnan-
wendungen - Anforderungen an die Kollisionssicher-
heit von Schienenfahrzeugk¨asten) (Standard No. DIN
EN 15227:2020-06). (2020, 6). Berlin, Germany:
Deutsches Institut f¨ur Normung (DIN).
EN 10025-2: Hot rolled products of structural steels - Part 2:
Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural
steels (Standard No. EN 10025-2:2019). (2019). Brus-
sels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardiza-
tion (CEN). (Details baseline properties for S235 steel
including 235 MPa yield strength, 360 MPa ultimate
tensile strength (UTS), and 26% elongation)
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2019). En
10025-2: Hot rolled products of structural steels - part
2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy struc-
tural steels (Tech. Rep.). Brussels: CEN.
Fang, C., Otero, H. J., Greenberg, D., & Neumann, P. J.
(2011). Cost-utility analyses of diagnostic labora-
tory tests: A systematic review. Value in Health,
14(8), 1010-1018. Retrieved from https://www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S109830151101494X doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.044
Goldsmith, W. (2001). Impact: The theory and physical
behaviour of colliding solids. Dover Publications.
Hess, P. E., Bruchman, D., Assakkaf, I. A., & Ayyub,
B. M. (2002). Uncertainties in material and geomet-
ric strength and load variables. Naval Engineers Jour-
nal, 114(2), 139–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.2002
.tb00128.x
Johnson, G. R., & Cook, W. H. (1983). A constitutive
model and data for metals subjected to large strains,
high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings
of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 541–
547.
Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS). (2001). Prob-
abilistic model code: Part 3 - resistance models (struc-
tural steel) (Tech. Rep.). JCSS. (Provides the foun-
dational probabilistic distributions and expected coeffi-
cients of variation (COV) for structural steel yield and
ultimate strengths.)
Kashiparekh, K., Narwariya, J., Malhotra, P., Vig, L., &
Shroff, G. (2019). Convtimenet: A pre-trained deep
convolutional neural network for time series classifica-
tion. 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks (IJCNN). doi: 10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8852105
Kucherenko, S., et al. (2024). Application of
sobol’ sequences for deterministic sampling in high-
dimensional machine learning emulators. Computer
Physics Communications, 294, 108912.
Mareau, C. (2020). A thermodynamically consistent formu-
lation of the johnson–cook model. Mechanics of Mate-
rials, 143, 103340. Retrieved from https://www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S0167663619307720 doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103340
Morris, J. W. (2009). The strength and ductility of structural
alloys. Progress in Materials Science, 54(3), 312–345.
Ochella, S., Shafiee, M., & Dinmohammadi, F. (2022).
Artificial intelligence in prognostics and health
management of engineering systems. Engi-
neering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,
108, 104552. Retrieved from https ://
www .sciencedirect .com / science /
article / pii / S0952197621003961 doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104552
Peng, D., Gui, Z., & Wu, H. (2024). Interpreting the curse of
dimensionality from distance concentration and mani-
fold effect. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/
abs/2401 .00422 doi: 10 .48550/arXiv .2401
.00422
Pore, T., Thorat, S. G., & Nema, A. A. (2021). Re-
view of contact modelling in nonlinear finite el-
ement analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings,
47, 2436-2440. Retrieved from https :// www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S2214785321034295 (International Con-
ference on Materials and System Engineering) doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.504
Shrivastava, S., Ghosh, C., & Jonas, J. (2012, 03). A com-
parison of the von mises and hencky equivalent strains
for use in simple shear experiments. Philosophical
Magazine, 92, 779-786. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2011
.634848
Sobol’, I. M. (1967). On the distribution of points in a cube
and the approximate evaluation of integrals. Zh. Vy-
chisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 7(4), 784–802.
Terfloth, S. (2008). ICE-TD Neustadt(Dosse). https://
de .wikipedia .org / wiki / Datei : ICE -TD
Neustadt(Dosse).jpg. (Accessed: 2026-05-
28)
Wang, J., et al. (2025). The big sobol sequence: Optimizing
neural network convergence profiles for complex engi-
neering simulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13755.
Wu, W., Cantero-Chinchilla, S., Prescott, D., Remenyte-
Prescott, R., & Chiach´ıo, M. (2024). A gen-
eral approach to assessing shm reliability consid-
ering sensor failures based on information the-
ory. Reliability Engineering System Safety,
250, 110267. Retrieved from https :// www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S0951832024003399 doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ress.2024.110267
Zhang, Y., Hao, R., Niiranen, J., Yang, Y., Br¨uhwiler,
E., Su, D., & Nagayama, T. (2024). Computa-
tional engine for finite element digital twins of struc-
tural dynamics via motion data. Engineering Struc-
tures, 316, 118630. Retrieved from https://www
.sciencedirect .com / science / article /
pii/S0141029624011921 doi: https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118630

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.